城市地形下两种GPS保真度预报服务的精度评价

Andrew Moore, Julian Gutierrez, Evan Dill, Michael Logan, J. S. Glover, S. Young, Nathan Hoege
{"title":"城市地形下两种GPS保真度预报服务的精度评价","authors":"Andrew Moore, Julian Gutierrez, Evan Dill, Michael Logan, J. S. Glover, S. Young, Nathan Hoege","doi":"10.1109/PLANS53410.2023.10140019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low altitude flight in urban areas is susceptible to degraded GNSS-based navigation system performance due to terrain interference with radio signals from orbital positioning satellites. Predictive navigation performance fidelity tools are needed a) in preflight planning to assist in the creation of safe flight paths and b) in-flight to provide contingency management agents with the navigation risk of proximal flight corridors. Two navigation fidelity prediction services are validated by comparison with over 6000 readings from GNSS sensors collected along a five-mile path through urban areas of Corpus Christi, Texas, on three dates in 2022. Predictions are based on satellite line of sight through 3D terrain data collected in 2018. Each service predicts a set of navigation fidelity metrics over a user-specified time period. One metric estimated by both is the number of visible satellites. A direct comparison of the number of predicted visible satellites with the number sensed by the receiver is used to validate the prediction services. Results show an exact match in the number of predicted satellites for 60% of the measurements, and a match within +/- 4 satellites for 95% of the measurements. As expected, agreement improves away from vertical blocking terrain. Most cases of mismatch are due a lower predicted count than measured (false negatives), and can be accounted for by receiver pickup of stray signals caused by multipath propagation. About 10% of mismatches are false positives and are mostly accounted for by foliage effects. The two services predict visibility of the same set of satellites 80% of the time, differ by two or less satellites 95% of the time, and can compute predictions for one hour of observations in one minute or less. Validation is analyzed statistically and in detailed case studies of selected observation times. The prediction services validated in this study run fast enough for preflight safety planning. The more stringent challenge of in-flight navigation fidelity prediction for contingency management requires both a speedup of the current level of modeling and equally fast stray signal modeling.","PeriodicalId":344794,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy Assessment of Two GPS Fidelity Prediction Services in Urban Terrain\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Moore, Julian Gutierrez, Evan Dill, Michael Logan, J. S. Glover, S. Young, Nathan Hoege\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PLANS53410.2023.10140019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Low altitude flight in urban areas is susceptible to degraded GNSS-based navigation system performance due to terrain interference with radio signals from orbital positioning satellites. Predictive navigation performance fidelity tools are needed a) in preflight planning to assist in the creation of safe flight paths and b) in-flight to provide contingency management agents with the navigation risk of proximal flight corridors. Two navigation fidelity prediction services are validated by comparison with over 6000 readings from GNSS sensors collected along a five-mile path through urban areas of Corpus Christi, Texas, on three dates in 2022. Predictions are based on satellite line of sight through 3D terrain data collected in 2018. Each service predicts a set of navigation fidelity metrics over a user-specified time period. One metric estimated by both is the number of visible satellites. A direct comparison of the number of predicted visible satellites with the number sensed by the receiver is used to validate the prediction services. Results show an exact match in the number of predicted satellites for 60% of the measurements, and a match within +/- 4 satellites for 95% of the measurements. As expected, agreement improves away from vertical blocking terrain. Most cases of mismatch are due a lower predicted count than measured (false negatives), and can be accounted for by receiver pickup of stray signals caused by multipath propagation. About 10% of mismatches are false positives and are mostly accounted for by foliage effects. The two services predict visibility of the same set of satellites 80% of the time, differ by two or less satellites 95% of the time, and can compute predictions for one hour of observations in one minute or less. Validation is analyzed statistically and in detailed case studies of selected observation times. The prediction services validated in this study run fast enough for preflight safety planning. The more stringent challenge of in-flight navigation fidelity prediction for contingency management requires both a speedup of the current level of modeling and equally fast stray signal modeling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS53410.2023.10140019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS53410.2023.10140019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

由于地形干扰轨道定位卫星的无线电信号,城市地区的低空飞行容易受到gnss导航系统性能下降的影响。预测导航性能保真度工具需要a)在飞行前计划中协助创建安全飞行路径,b)在飞行中为应急管理代理提供近距离飞行走廊的导航风险。两种导航保真度预测服务通过与2022年三个日期在德克萨斯州科珀斯克里斯蒂市区五英里路径上收集的GNSS传感器的6000多个读数进行比较来验证。预测是基于2018年收集的卫星视线3D地形数据。每个服务在用户指定的时间段内预测一组导航保真度指标。两者估计的一个指标是可见卫星的数量。将预测的可见卫星数量与接收机感知到的卫星数量进行直接比较,以验证预测服务。结果表明,60%的测量结果与预测卫星数量完全匹配,95%的测量结果在+/- 4颗卫星范围内匹配。正如预期的那样,在远离垂直阻塞地形的情况下,一致性得到改善。大多数不匹配的情况是由于预测计数低于测量计数(假阴性),并且可以通过接收机拾取多径传播引起的杂散信号来解释。大约10%的不匹配是假阳性,主要是由树叶效应造成的。这两种服务在80%的时间内预测同一组卫星的能见度,95%的时间内相差两颗或更少的卫星,并且可以在一分钟或更短的时间内计算出一小时观测的预测。验证是统计分析和详细的案例研究选定的观察时间。本研究验证的预测服务运行速度足够快,可用于飞行前安全规划。对于突发事件管理的飞行导航保真度预测的更严格的挑战,既需要当前建模水平的加速,也需要同样快速的杂散信号建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy Assessment of Two GPS Fidelity Prediction Services in Urban Terrain
Low altitude flight in urban areas is susceptible to degraded GNSS-based navigation system performance due to terrain interference with radio signals from orbital positioning satellites. Predictive navigation performance fidelity tools are needed a) in preflight planning to assist in the creation of safe flight paths and b) in-flight to provide contingency management agents with the navigation risk of proximal flight corridors. Two navigation fidelity prediction services are validated by comparison with over 6000 readings from GNSS sensors collected along a five-mile path through urban areas of Corpus Christi, Texas, on three dates in 2022. Predictions are based on satellite line of sight through 3D terrain data collected in 2018. Each service predicts a set of navigation fidelity metrics over a user-specified time period. One metric estimated by both is the number of visible satellites. A direct comparison of the number of predicted visible satellites with the number sensed by the receiver is used to validate the prediction services. Results show an exact match in the number of predicted satellites for 60% of the measurements, and a match within +/- 4 satellites for 95% of the measurements. As expected, agreement improves away from vertical blocking terrain. Most cases of mismatch are due a lower predicted count than measured (false negatives), and can be accounted for by receiver pickup of stray signals caused by multipath propagation. About 10% of mismatches are false positives and are mostly accounted for by foliage effects. The two services predict visibility of the same set of satellites 80% of the time, differ by two or less satellites 95% of the time, and can compute predictions for one hour of observations in one minute or less. Validation is analyzed statistically and in detailed case studies of selected observation times. The prediction services validated in this study run fast enough for preflight safety planning. The more stringent challenge of in-flight navigation fidelity prediction for contingency management requires both a speedup of the current level of modeling and equally fast stray signal modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信