文件,请…:X.509证书撤销实践

Manuel Koschuch, Ronald Wagner
{"title":"文件,请…:X.509证书撤销实践","authors":"Manuel Koschuch, Ronald Wagner","doi":"10.5220/0005113800360040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"X.509v3 certificates are the current standard of verifiable associating an entity with a public key, and are widely used in different networking applications: from HTTPS in browsers, SSH connections, to e-mail, PDF and code signing. This wide usage also necessitates the existence of a robust, reliable way to detect and deal with compromised or otherwise invalid certificates. Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) and the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) are the two mechanisms currently deployed to handle revoked certificates. In this position paper we present preliminary results of our research into the practical use of these protocols, using an existing data-set to show that almost 85% of certificates currently in use contain no revocation information, and compare different browsers under different operating systems as to their dealing with unreachable OCSP servers. We find that browser behaviour in this case ranges from opening the site without any warnings whatsoever to totally blocking it, indicating no clear default reaction and no reliable behaviour.","PeriodicalId":394687,"journal":{"name":"2014 5th International Conference on Data Communication Networking (DCNET)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Papers, Please…: X.509 certificate revocation in practice\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Koschuch, Ronald Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0005113800360040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"X.509v3 certificates are the current standard of verifiable associating an entity with a public key, and are widely used in different networking applications: from HTTPS in browsers, SSH connections, to e-mail, PDF and code signing. This wide usage also necessitates the existence of a robust, reliable way to detect and deal with compromised or otherwise invalid certificates. Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) and the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) are the two mechanisms currently deployed to handle revoked certificates. In this position paper we present preliminary results of our research into the practical use of these protocols, using an existing data-set to show that almost 85% of certificates currently in use contain no revocation information, and compare different browsers under different operating systems as to their dealing with unreachable OCSP servers. We find that browser behaviour in this case ranges from opening the site without any warnings whatsoever to totally blocking it, indicating no clear default reaction and no reliable behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 5th International Conference on Data Communication Networking (DCNET)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 5th International Conference on Data Communication Networking (DCNET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005113800360040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 5th International Conference on Data Communication Networking (DCNET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005113800360040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

X.509v3证书是当前验证实体与公钥关联的标准,广泛用于不同的网络应用程序:从浏览器中的HTTPS、SSH连接到电子邮件、PDF和代码签名。这种广泛的使用还需要有一种健壮、可靠的方法来检测和处理受损或无效的证书。证书撤销列表(crl)和在线证书状态协议(OCSP)是目前用于处理已撤销证书的两种机制。在这篇立场文件中,我们介绍了我们对这些协议实际使用的初步研究结果,使用现有的数据集显示,目前使用的证书中几乎有85%不包含吊销信息,并比较了不同操作系统下不同浏览器处理不可达OCSP服务器的情况。我们发现,在这种情况下,浏览器的行为范围从没有任何警告就打开网站到完全阻止它,表明没有明确的默认反应和可靠的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Papers, Please…: X.509 certificate revocation in practice
X.509v3 certificates are the current standard of verifiable associating an entity with a public key, and are widely used in different networking applications: from HTTPS in browsers, SSH connections, to e-mail, PDF and code signing. This wide usage also necessitates the existence of a robust, reliable way to detect and deal with compromised or otherwise invalid certificates. Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) and the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) are the two mechanisms currently deployed to handle revoked certificates. In this position paper we present preliminary results of our research into the practical use of these protocols, using an existing data-set to show that almost 85% of certificates currently in use contain no revocation information, and compare different browsers under different operating systems as to their dealing with unreachable OCSP servers. We find that browser behaviour in this case ranges from opening the site without any warnings whatsoever to totally blocking it, indicating no clear default reaction and no reliable behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信