科技期刊编辑政策是保障出版伦理原则的因素

A. Petrushka
{"title":"科技期刊编辑政策是保障出版伦理原则的因素","authors":"A. Petrushka","doi":"10.32461/2409-9805.4.2022.269808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to determine the essential criteria for assessing the compliance of the editorial policy of a scientific journal with the principles of publishing ethics and academic integrity. The research methodology uses the content analysis method. By this method, the content of the websites of \"A\" category scientific journals in social communications from the List of scientific professional editions of Ukraine as of October 1, 2022, has been analysed. The research also involves the use of methods of generalisation and grouping to determine the criteria for assessing the completeness of the information presentation of the editorial policy regarding publication ethics and prevention of unethical practices. The information content of the websites of scientific journals indicates thematic proximity but not the identity of the way of declaring the editorial policy regarding publication ethics and academic integrity. Emphasis on specific aspects of the editorial policy is a manifestation of the formation of the individual vision of the journal's editorial board of the concept of a quality scientific publication in line with generally accepted international standards. The novelty of the obtained results is in the definition of information blocks that serve as criteria for evaluating the completeness of the information presentation of the editorial policy regarding publication ethics and the prevention of unethical practices. These include the principles of publishing ethics, the review policy, and the policy of combating unethical practices. Conclusions. The widespread distribution of norms of publication ethics and academic integrity on the websites of scientific publications creates a single information field of requirements for participants in the publication process. The identified criteria for the completeness of the information presentation of the editorial policy in the field of publishing ethics determine the guidelines for the development of the content of the websites of new journals, as well as the transformation and adaptation to the modern requirements of already existing editions. The availability of detailed information on the principles of publishing ethics, review policy, and counteraction to unethical practices policy will increase the level of awareness and literacy of all participants in the publishing process: authors, editors, reviewers, and consumers of scientific information. \nKeywords: scientific journal, editorial policy, publishing ethics, academic integrity, website.","PeriodicalId":318806,"journal":{"name":"Scientific journal “Library Science. Record Studies. Informology”","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial Policy of Scientific Journal as Factor in Ensuring Principles of Publication Ethics\",\"authors\":\"A. Petrushka\",\"doi\":\"10.32461/2409-9805.4.2022.269808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to determine the essential criteria for assessing the compliance of the editorial policy of a scientific journal with the principles of publishing ethics and academic integrity. The research methodology uses the content analysis method. By this method, the content of the websites of \\\"A\\\" category scientific journals in social communications from the List of scientific professional editions of Ukraine as of October 1, 2022, has been analysed. The research also involves the use of methods of generalisation and grouping to determine the criteria for assessing the completeness of the information presentation of the editorial policy regarding publication ethics and prevention of unethical practices. The information content of the websites of scientific journals indicates thematic proximity but not the identity of the way of declaring the editorial policy regarding publication ethics and academic integrity. Emphasis on specific aspects of the editorial policy is a manifestation of the formation of the individual vision of the journal's editorial board of the concept of a quality scientific publication in line with generally accepted international standards. The novelty of the obtained results is in the definition of information blocks that serve as criteria for evaluating the completeness of the information presentation of the editorial policy regarding publication ethics and the prevention of unethical practices. These include the principles of publishing ethics, the review policy, and the policy of combating unethical practices. Conclusions. The widespread distribution of norms of publication ethics and academic integrity on the websites of scientific publications creates a single information field of requirements for participants in the publication process. The identified criteria for the completeness of the information presentation of the editorial policy in the field of publishing ethics determine the guidelines for the development of the content of the websites of new journals, as well as the transformation and adaptation to the modern requirements of already existing editions. The availability of detailed information on the principles of publishing ethics, review policy, and counteraction to unethical practices policy will increase the level of awareness and literacy of all participants in the publishing process: authors, editors, reviewers, and consumers of scientific information. \\nKeywords: scientific journal, editorial policy, publishing ethics, academic integrity, website.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific journal “Library Science. Record Studies. Informology”\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific journal “Library Science. Record Studies. Informology”\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.4.2022.269808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific journal “Library Science. Record Studies. Informology”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.4.2022.269808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定评估科学期刊编辑政策是否符合出版伦理和学术诚信原则的基本标准。研究方法采用内容分析法。通过这种方法,分析了截至2022年10月1日乌克兰科学专业版本列表中社会传播“A”类科学期刊网站的内容。该研究还涉及使用概括和分组的方法,以确定评估关于出版伦理和预防不道德行为的编辑政策信息呈现的完整性的标准。科技期刊网站的信息内容表明了主题的接近性,而不是发表伦理和学术诚信编辑政策声明方式的同一性。对具体方面的编辑政策的重视是期刊编委会形成个人视野的体现,是一份符合普遍接受的国际标准的高质量科学出版物的理念。获得的结果的新颖性在于信息块的定义,这些信息块作为评估有关出版伦理和预防不道德行为的编辑政策信息呈现的完整性的标准。这些原则包括出版伦理原则、审查政策和打击不道德行为的政策。结论。出版伦理规范和学术诚信规范在科学出版物网站上的广泛传播,为出版过程中的参与者创造了一个单一的信息需求领域。出版伦理领域编辑政策信息呈现完整性的确定标准,决定了新期刊网站内容发展的指导方针,以及现有版本的改造和适应现代要求的指导方针。关于出版伦理原则、审查政策和应对不道德行为政策的详细信息的可用性将提高出版过程中所有参与者的意识和素养水平:作者、编辑、审稿人和科学信息的消费者。关键词:科技期刊,编辑政策,出版伦理,学术诚信,网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial Policy of Scientific Journal as Factor in Ensuring Principles of Publication Ethics
The study aims to determine the essential criteria for assessing the compliance of the editorial policy of a scientific journal with the principles of publishing ethics and academic integrity. The research methodology uses the content analysis method. By this method, the content of the websites of "A" category scientific journals in social communications from the List of scientific professional editions of Ukraine as of October 1, 2022, has been analysed. The research also involves the use of methods of generalisation and grouping to determine the criteria for assessing the completeness of the information presentation of the editorial policy regarding publication ethics and prevention of unethical practices. The information content of the websites of scientific journals indicates thematic proximity but not the identity of the way of declaring the editorial policy regarding publication ethics and academic integrity. Emphasis on specific aspects of the editorial policy is a manifestation of the formation of the individual vision of the journal's editorial board of the concept of a quality scientific publication in line with generally accepted international standards. The novelty of the obtained results is in the definition of information blocks that serve as criteria for evaluating the completeness of the information presentation of the editorial policy regarding publication ethics and the prevention of unethical practices. These include the principles of publishing ethics, the review policy, and the policy of combating unethical practices. Conclusions. The widespread distribution of norms of publication ethics and academic integrity on the websites of scientific publications creates a single information field of requirements for participants in the publication process. The identified criteria for the completeness of the information presentation of the editorial policy in the field of publishing ethics determine the guidelines for the development of the content of the websites of new journals, as well as the transformation and adaptation to the modern requirements of already existing editions. The availability of detailed information on the principles of publishing ethics, review policy, and counteraction to unethical practices policy will increase the level of awareness and literacy of all participants in the publishing process: authors, editors, reviewers, and consumers of scientific information. Keywords: scientific journal, editorial policy, publishing ethics, academic integrity, website.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信