评估业务流程和工作流描述用例图的适用性

G. Mussbacher, Daniel Amyot
{"title":"评估业务流程和工作流描述用例图的适用性","authors":"G. Mussbacher, Daniel Amyot","doi":"10.1109/MCETECH.2008.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use Case Maps (UCMs) have already been used to describe business processes and workflows at a high level of abstraction. The semantics of UCMs, however, require further clarification and enhancement. An initial assessment based on 27 workflow and communication patterns (a) highlighted some of the semantic variation points of UCMs, (b) introduced small extensions to the UCM language in order to more precisely define scenarios, high-level business processes, and workflows, and (c) compared UCMs with other business process and workflow languages. This short paper summarizes the continuation of the assessment with a larger set of workflow patterns recently made available. The assessment concludes that the UCM notation including the proposed extensions is a competitive language to describe high-level business processes and workflows, while providing additional benefits over the other languages.","PeriodicalId":299458,"journal":{"name":"2008 International MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies (mcetech 2008)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Applicability of Use Case Maps for Business Process and Workflow Description\",\"authors\":\"G. Mussbacher, Daniel Amyot\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MCETECH.2008.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Use Case Maps (UCMs) have already been used to describe business processes and workflows at a high level of abstraction. The semantics of UCMs, however, require further clarification and enhancement. An initial assessment based on 27 workflow and communication patterns (a) highlighted some of the semantic variation points of UCMs, (b) introduced small extensions to the UCM language in order to more precisely define scenarios, high-level business processes, and workflows, and (c) compared UCMs with other business process and workflow languages. This short paper summarizes the continuation of the assessment with a larger set of workflow patterns recently made available. The assessment concludes that the UCM notation including the proposed extensions is a competitive language to describe high-level business processes and workflows, while providing additional benefits over the other languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 International MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies (mcetech 2008)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 International MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies (mcetech 2008)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCETECH.2008.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies (mcetech 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCETECH.2008.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

用例图(ucm)已经被用于描述高层次抽象的业务过程和工作流。然而,ucm的语义需要进一步的澄清和增强。基于27个工作流和通信模式的初步评估(a)突出了UCM的一些语义变化点,(b)引入了对UCM语言的小扩展,以便更精确地定义场景、高级业务过程和工作流,以及(c)将UCM与其他业务过程和工作流语言进行比较。这篇简短的文章用最近可用的一组更大的工作流模式总结了评估的延续。评估得出的结论是,UCM符号包括建议的扩展是描述高级业务过程和工作流的竞争性语言,同时提供了比其他语言更多的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Applicability of Use Case Maps for Business Process and Workflow Description
Use Case Maps (UCMs) have already been used to describe business processes and workflows at a high level of abstraction. The semantics of UCMs, however, require further clarification and enhancement. An initial assessment based on 27 workflow and communication patterns (a) highlighted some of the semantic variation points of UCMs, (b) introduced small extensions to the UCM language in order to more precisely define scenarios, high-level business processes, and workflows, and (c) compared UCMs with other business process and workflow languages. This short paper summarizes the continuation of the assessment with a larger set of workflow patterns recently made available. The assessment concludes that the UCM notation including the proposed extensions is a competitive language to describe high-level business processes and workflows, while providing additional benefits over the other languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信