2078/1978。期待与当代

J. Brassett, J. O'Reilly
{"title":"2078/1978。期待与当代","authors":"J. Brassett, J. O'Reilly","doi":"10.4324/9780367234591-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018 we were asked to anticipate 2078 for a piece that provided some form of foresight into that world-to-come (Brassett and O’Reilly, 2018b). We, fairly obviously to us but maybe a little perversely, chose to look first to 1978, to a moment of our teenage/proto-teenage years and punk/new wave. This was not so much a choice driven by some theoretical framework or other, but one that was stylistic: a trope that allowed us into the world of 2078. The 78 as a node joining different narratives, trends and affects. These 78s (and all the others) will always be connected, we thought, even if different flows spill through the tracks. As we are familiar with the work of philosopherpsychoanalyst couple Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, we found a similar energetics informing their joint writings: especially the second volume of their ‘Capitalism and Schizophrenia’ series, A Thousand Plateaus (1988); and, in that text, particularly their opening ‘Introduction: Rhizome’ (pp. 3–25). Here, Deleuze and Guattari are resolutely more than individuals collaborating. Their opening words are: ‘The two of us wrote Anti-Oedipus together. Since each of us was several, there was already quite a crowd’ (Deleuze and Guattari, 1988, p. 3). They crowd and spread through their text – though, to say ‘their text’ undermines their desire to create an open-ended, multiplicity of a book – rambling through works, disciplines and loves, creating philosophical concepts as they go. Most importantly for us, now, is their choice to attach dates to each of the chapters (apart from their introduction and conclusion). So, for example, Chapter seven is ‘Year Zero: Faciality’ and Chapter eleven is ‘1837: Of the Refrain’ (Deleuze and Guattari, 1987, pp. 167–191, 310–350). For them, the date gives a specific moment at which the concepts they put into play intensify strongly and are able to communicate as pure a sense of themselves as possible. Their dates are barbed, sticky, seed-like forms that serve to attach concepts to those of us passing by. Similarly, then, do we offer 2078 and 1978 to locate our sense of contemporary in relation to anticipation, in a way that is also Jamie Brassett and John O’Reilly","PeriodicalId":443590,"journal":{"name":"A Creative Philosophy of Anticipation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2078/1978. Anticipation and the contemporary\",\"authors\":\"J. Brassett, J. O'Reilly\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780367234591-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2018 we were asked to anticipate 2078 for a piece that provided some form of foresight into that world-to-come (Brassett and O’Reilly, 2018b). We, fairly obviously to us but maybe a little perversely, chose to look first to 1978, to a moment of our teenage/proto-teenage years and punk/new wave. This was not so much a choice driven by some theoretical framework or other, but one that was stylistic: a trope that allowed us into the world of 2078. The 78 as a node joining different narratives, trends and affects. These 78s (and all the others) will always be connected, we thought, even if different flows spill through the tracks. As we are familiar with the work of philosopherpsychoanalyst couple Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, we found a similar energetics informing their joint writings: especially the second volume of their ‘Capitalism and Schizophrenia’ series, A Thousand Plateaus (1988); and, in that text, particularly their opening ‘Introduction: Rhizome’ (pp. 3–25). Here, Deleuze and Guattari are resolutely more than individuals collaborating. Their opening words are: ‘The two of us wrote Anti-Oedipus together. Since each of us was several, there was already quite a crowd’ (Deleuze and Guattari, 1988, p. 3). They crowd and spread through their text – though, to say ‘their text’ undermines their desire to create an open-ended, multiplicity of a book – rambling through works, disciplines and loves, creating philosophical concepts as they go. Most importantly for us, now, is their choice to attach dates to each of the chapters (apart from their introduction and conclusion). So, for example, Chapter seven is ‘Year Zero: Faciality’ and Chapter eleven is ‘1837: Of the Refrain’ (Deleuze and Guattari, 1987, pp. 167–191, 310–350). For them, the date gives a specific moment at which the concepts they put into play intensify strongly and are able to communicate as pure a sense of themselves as possible. Their dates are barbed, sticky, seed-like forms that serve to attach concepts to those of us passing by. Similarly, then, do we offer 2078 and 1978 to locate our sense of contemporary in relation to anticipation, in a way that is also Jamie Brassett and John O’Reilly\",\"PeriodicalId\":443590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Creative Philosophy of Anticipation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Creative Philosophy of Anticipation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367234591-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Creative Philosophy of Anticipation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367234591-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018年,我们被要求预测2078年的一篇文章,该文章提供了对未来世界的某种形式的预见(Brassett和O 'Reilly, 2018b)。我们,对我们来说很明显,但可能有点反常,选择首先关注1978年,我们的青少年/原始青少年时期和朋克/新浪潮的时刻。这并不是一个受理论框架或其他因素驱动的选择,而是一种风格上的选择:一种让我们进入2078年世界的修辞。78作为一个节点连接不同的叙述,趋势和影响。我们想,这些78号列车(以及其他所有的列车)将永远连接在一起,即使不同的车流从铁轨上溢出。正如我们所熟悉的哲学家和精神分析学家吉尔斯·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)和菲姆斯·瓜塔里(f lix Guattari)夫妇的作品一样,我们发现他们的联合著作中也有类似的能量学:尤其是他们的“资本主义与精神分裂症”系列的第二卷《千高原》(a Thousand plateau, 1988);在那篇文章中,特别是他们的开头“引言:根茎”(第3-25页)。在这里,德勒兹和瓜塔里绝不仅仅是个人的合作。他们的开场白是:“我们俩一起写了《反俄狄浦斯》。因为我们每个人都是几个人,所以已经有了一个相当大的群体”(德勒兹和瓜塔里,1988年,第3页)。他们通过他们的文本聚集和传播——尽管说“他们的文本”破坏了他们创造一本书的开放式、多样性的愿望——在作品、学科和爱中漫步,边走边创造哲学概念。现在对我们来说最重要的是,他们选择在每章后面附上日期(除了引言和结论)。例如,第七章是“元年:面相”,第十一章是“1837年:叠句”(德勒兹和瓜塔里,1987年,第167-191页,310-350页)。对他们来说,日期提供了一个特定的时刻,在这个时刻,他们所投入的概念得到了强烈的强化,并且能够尽可能纯粹地传达他们自己的感觉。他们的日期是有刺的,粘的,像种子一样的形式,用来给我们路过的人附加概念。同样地,我们是否可以用《2078》和《1978》来定位我们的当代感与期待之间的关系,就像杰米·布拉塞特和约翰·奥莱利一样
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2078/1978. Anticipation and the contemporary
In 2018 we were asked to anticipate 2078 for a piece that provided some form of foresight into that world-to-come (Brassett and O’Reilly, 2018b). We, fairly obviously to us but maybe a little perversely, chose to look first to 1978, to a moment of our teenage/proto-teenage years and punk/new wave. This was not so much a choice driven by some theoretical framework or other, but one that was stylistic: a trope that allowed us into the world of 2078. The 78 as a node joining different narratives, trends and affects. These 78s (and all the others) will always be connected, we thought, even if different flows spill through the tracks. As we are familiar with the work of philosopherpsychoanalyst couple Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, we found a similar energetics informing their joint writings: especially the second volume of their ‘Capitalism and Schizophrenia’ series, A Thousand Plateaus (1988); and, in that text, particularly their opening ‘Introduction: Rhizome’ (pp. 3–25). Here, Deleuze and Guattari are resolutely more than individuals collaborating. Their opening words are: ‘The two of us wrote Anti-Oedipus together. Since each of us was several, there was already quite a crowd’ (Deleuze and Guattari, 1988, p. 3). They crowd and spread through their text – though, to say ‘their text’ undermines their desire to create an open-ended, multiplicity of a book – rambling through works, disciplines and loves, creating philosophical concepts as they go. Most importantly for us, now, is their choice to attach dates to each of the chapters (apart from their introduction and conclusion). So, for example, Chapter seven is ‘Year Zero: Faciality’ and Chapter eleven is ‘1837: Of the Refrain’ (Deleuze and Guattari, 1987, pp. 167–191, 310–350). For them, the date gives a specific moment at which the concepts they put into play intensify strongly and are able to communicate as pure a sense of themselves as possible. Their dates are barbed, sticky, seed-like forms that serve to attach concepts to those of us passing by. Similarly, then, do we offer 2078 and 1978 to locate our sense of contemporary in relation to anticipation, in a way that is also Jamie Brassett and John O’Reilly
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信