大型模型数据持久化技术的比较分析

XM '12 Pub Date : 2012-10-01 DOI:10.1145/2467307.2467314
Konstantinos Barmpis, D. Kolovos
{"title":"大型模型数据持久化技术的比较分析","authors":"Konstantinos Barmpis, D. Kolovos","doi":"10.1145/2467307.2467314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scalability in Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is often a bottleneck for industrial applications. Industrial scale models need to be persisted in a way that allows for their seamless and efficient manipulation, often by multiple stakeholders simultaneously. This paper compares the conventional and commonly used persistence mechanisms in MDE with novel approaches such as the use of graph-based NoSQL databases; Prototype integrations of Neo4J and OrientDB with EMF are used to compare with relational database, XMI and document-based NoSQL database persistence mechanisms. Benchmarking of these technologies is then performed, to measure and compare their relative performance in terms of memory usage and execution time.","PeriodicalId":196943,"journal":{"name":"XM '12","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of data persistence technologies for large-scale models\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Barmpis, D. Kolovos\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2467307.2467314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scalability in Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is often a bottleneck for industrial applications. Industrial scale models need to be persisted in a way that allows for their seamless and efficient manipulation, often by multiple stakeholders simultaneously. This paper compares the conventional and commonly used persistence mechanisms in MDE with novel approaches such as the use of graph-based NoSQL databases; Prototype integrations of Neo4J and OrientDB with EMF are used to compare with relational database, XMI and document-based NoSQL database persistence mechanisms. Benchmarking of these technologies is then performed, to measure and compare their relative performance in terms of memory usage and execution time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"XM '12\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"XM '12\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2467307.2467314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"XM '12","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2467307.2467314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

模型驱动工程(MDE)中的可伸缩性通常是工业应用的瓶颈。工业规模的模型需要以一种允许无缝和有效操作的方式保存,通常由多个利益相关者同时操作。本文比较了MDE中传统和常用的持久机制与使用基于图的NoSQL数据库等新方法;Neo4J和OrientDB与EMF的原型集成用于与关系数据库、xml和基于文档的NoSQL数据库持久性机制进行比较。然后对这些技术进行基准测试,以衡量和比较它们在内存使用和执行时间方面的相对性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of data persistence technologies for large-scale models
Scalability in Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is often a bottleneck for industrial applications. Industrial scale models need to be persisted in a way that allows for their seamless and efficient manipulation, often by multiple stakeholders simultaneously. This paper compares the conventional and commonly used persistence mechanisms in MDE with novel approaches such as the use of graph-based NoSQL databases; Prototype integrations of Neo4J and OrientDB with EMF are used to compare with relational database, XMI and document-based NoSQL database persistence mechanisms. Benchmarking of these technologies is then performed, to measure and compare their relative performance in terms of memory usage and execution time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信