{"title":"不可逆性牙髓炎患者使用端通气NaviTip与侧通气NaviTip洗牙后疼痛的评价:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Elsaeed A. Elhafez, Amgad Soliman","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2018.53972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"objectives: This clinical study was conducted to evaluate and compare the post-operative pain after the using of two different irrigation tips: end-vented NaviTip tip and double sideport NaviTip irrigator tip immediate postoperatively and 4, 12, 24 ,48, 72 hours and 7 days utilizing a numerical rating scale (NRS). Methods: 38 patients with vital lower posterior teeth without periapical radiolucency underwent one-visit root canal treatment, Root canals were prepared using NiTi ProTaper Universal rotary system then randomized into two equal gropus according to the needle used for irrigation group(A) NaviTip® 29-gauge 27 mm with End vented Tip and Group (B) NaviTip® 31-gauge 27 mm with Side vented Irrigator Tip. The needles of irrigation were penetrated 2 mm shorter than the working length. The trial design of this study is a Parallel randomized controlled trial. All demographic data, clinical and radiographic findings and modified VAS scores obtained from patients were statistically analyzed. Results: showed that there was no statistically difference between the two groups regarding the demographic data, prevalence of pre-operative pain, after 4 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours and 7 days. There is no statistical significance difference between End vented NaviTip and Side vented NaviTip , while in both groups there was a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity preoperatively compared with all other time periods.Conclusion: there was a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity preoperatively compared with all other time periods","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Irrigation Using End Vented NaviTip Tips Versus Side Vented NaviTip Tips in Teeth with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Elsaeed A. Elhafez, Amgad Soliman\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/aadj.2018.53972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"objectives: This clinical study was conducted to evaluate and compare the post-operative pain after the using of two different irrigation tips: end-vented NaviTip tip and double sideport NaviTip irrigator tip immediate postoperatively and 4, 12, 24 ,48, 72 hours and 7 days utilizing a numerical rating scale (NRS). Methods: 38 patients with vital lower posterior teeth without periapical radiolucency underwent one-visit root canal treatment, Root canals were prepared using NiTi ProTaper Universal rotary system then randomized into two equal gropus according to the needle used for irrigation group(A) NaviTip® 29-gauge 27 mm with End vented Tip and Group (B) NaviTip® 31-gauge 27 mm with Side vented Irrigator Tip. The needles of irrigation were penetrated 2 mm shorter than the working length. The trial design of this study is a Parallel randomized controlled trial. All demographic data, clinical and radiographic findings and modified VAS scores obtained from patients were statistically analyzed. Results: showed that there was no statistically difference between the two groups regarding the demographic data, prevalence of pre-operative pain, after 4 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours and 7 days. There is no statistical significance difference between End vented NaviTip and Side vented NaviTip , while in both groups there was a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity preoperatively compared with all other time periods.Conclusion: there was a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity preoperatively compared with all other time periods\",\"PeriodicalId\":136230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2018.53972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2018.53972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Irrigation Using End Vented NaviTip Tips Versus Side Vented NaviTip Tips in Teeth with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
objectives: This clinical study was conducted to evaluate and compare the post-operative pain after the using of two different irrigation tips: end-vented NaviTip tip and double sideport NaviTip irrigator tip immediate postoperatively and 4, 12, 24 ,48, 72 hours and 7 days utilizing a numerical rating scale (NRS). Methods: 38 patients with vital lower posterior teeth without periapical radiolucency underwent one-visit root canal treatment, Root canals were prepared using NiTi ProTaper Universal rotary system then randomized into two equal gropus according to the needle used for irrigation group(A) NaviTip® 29-gauge 27 mm with End vented Tip and Group (B) NaviTip® 31-gauge 27 mm with Side vented Irrigator Tip. The needles of irrigation were penetrated 2 mm shorter than the working length. The trial design of this study is a Parallel randomized controlled trial. All demographic data, clinical and radiographic findings and modified VAS scores obtained from patients were statistically analyzed. Results: showed that there was no statistically difference between the two groups regarding the demographic data, prevalence of pre-operative pain, after 4 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours and 7 days. There is no statistical significance difference between End vented NaviTip and Side vented NaviTip , while in both groups there was a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity preoperatively compared with all other time periods.Conclusion: there was a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity preoperatively compared with all other time periods