投资者情绪与非流动性溢价的时间变化

Fanesca Young, Benjamin M. Blau, Ryan J. Whitby
{"title":"投资者情绪与非流动性溢价的时间变化","authors":"Fanesca Young, Benjamin M. Blau, Ryan J. Whitby","doi":"10.52354/jsi.2.1.iv","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the return premium associated with illiquidity through time. Prior research has documented that investors command a return premium for holding the most illiquid stocks. The idea behind the return premium is that investors demand higher returns as compensation for the risk of not being able to liquidate their position in a timely manner (see Amihud and Mendelson (1986)). We find that the illiquidity premium has substantial variation across time. For instance, during the 25 years examined, the illiquidity premium is only significant in 11 of those years. In fact, the standard deviation of the illiquidity return premium is greater than the average return premium in some specifications. In additional tests, we find that during periods of low investor sentiment, the illiquidity premium is the highest, suggesting that sentiment might contribute to the observed time variation in the premium.","PeriodicalId":400870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systematic Investing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investor Sentiment and the Time Variation of the Illiquidity Premium\",\"authors\":\"Fanesca Young, Benjamin M. Blau, Ryan J. Whitby\",\"doi\":\"10.52354/jsi.2.1.iv\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the return premium associated with illiquidity through time. Prior research has documented that investors command a return premium for holding the most illiquid stocks. The idea behind the return premium is that investors demand higher returns as compensation for the risk of not being able to liquidate their position in a timely manner (see Amihud and Mendelson (1986)). We find that the illiquidity premium has substantial variation across time. For instance, during the 25 years examined, the illiquidity premium is only significant in 11 of those years. In fact, the standard deviation of the illiquidity return premium is greater than the average return premium in some specifications. In additional tests, we find that during periods of low investor sentiment, the illiquidity premium is the highest, suggesting that sentiment might contribute to the observed time variation in the premium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systematic Investing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systematic Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52354/jsi.2.1.iv\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systematic Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52354/jsi.2.1.iv","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了与非流动性相关的收益溢价随时间的变化。先前的研究已经证明,投资者持有流动性最差的股票会获得回报溢价。回报溢价背后的想法是,投资者要求更高的回报,作为无法及时平仓的风险的补偿(见Amihud和Mendelson(1986))。我们发现非流动性溢价在时间上有很大的变化。例如,在研究的25年中,非流动性溢价仅在其中11年显著。事实上,在某些指标下,非流动性收益溢价的标准差大于平均收益溢价。在额外的测试中,我们发现在投资者情绪低落的时期,非流动性溢价是最高的,这表明情绪可能有助于观察到的溢价的时间变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investor Sentiment and the Time Variation of the Illiquidity Premium
This paper examines the return premium associated with illiquidity through time. Prior research has documented that investors command a return premium for holding the most illiquid stocks. The idea behind the return premium is that investors demand higher returns as compensation for the risk of not being able to liquidate their position in a timely manner (see Amihud and Mendelson (1986)). We find that the illiquidity premium has substantial variation across time. For instance, during the 25 years examined, the illiquidity premium is only significant in 11 of those years. In fact, the standard deviation of the illiquidity return premium is greater than the average return premium in some specifications. In additional tests, we find that during periods of low investor sentiment, the illiquidity premium is the highest, suggesting that sentiment might contribute to the observed time variation in the premium.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信