地方财政促进地方企业可持续发展:国际发展援助在后新自由主义世界中识别和促进最佳实践的作用

M. Bateman
{"title":"地方财政促进地方企业可持续发展:国际发展援助在后新自由主义世界中识别和促进最佳实践的作用","authors":"M. Bateman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3075417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the central claims of the new generation of neoliberal economists that emerged in the 1960s, especially in the USA, was that market-driven private sector financial institutions were by far the most effective at intermediating capital into the most productive uses (Friedman, 1962; McKinnon, 1973: Shaw, 1973). Thanks to newly elected neoliberal-oriented governments in the USA and UK in the early 1980s, this academic viewpoint was soon embedded in global financial policy. The result was that a new form of ‘financialized’ capitalism came into existence (Epstein, 2005). However, ‘financialization’ turned out to be one of the major disasters of neoliberalism because very many financial institutions changed to become very destructive indeed: they no longer operated to help generate new wealth for all through rising productivity, but increasingly operated simply to redistribute existing wealth into the hands of a narrow investment and financial elite. A hugely risky, economically destructive and inequality-driving dynamic was catalyzed into existence (Harvey, 2004; Galbraith, 2014; Piketty, 2014). This paper extends the analysis of the impact of ‘financialization’ to focus on the local financial system that emerged in the neoliberal era, with the geographical focus on the global south. The paper goes on to identify the core requirements of a post-neoliberal ‘best/better practice’ model of ‘developmental’ local finance for local enterprise development. It centrally argues that there is an urgent need (once more) to ensure that scarce financial resources are locally intermediated into the ‘right’ enterprises that have defined productivity-enhancing and development-driving characteristics related to scale, technology, innovation, high skills, vertical and horizontal connections, employee participation, and the ability to develop new organizational routines and recombine assets in order to locate more productive and cooperative ways of working (Reinert, 2007; see also Bateman, 2013b).Using the many examples of successful local financial systems that have emerged since 1945, especially the case of China, the paper concludes that only by urgently reinventing and restructuring local finance as a ‘developmental’ project will it be possible to begin to address the significant damage created by forty years of local neoliberalism.","PeriodicalId":175326,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Finance for Sustainable Local Enterprise Development: The Role of International Development Assistance in Identifying and Promoting Best Practice in a Post-Neoliberal World\",\"authors\":\"M. Bateman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3075417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the central claims of the new generation of neoliberal economists that emerged in the 1960s, especially in the USA, was that market-driven private sector financial institutions were by far the most effective at intermediating capital into the most productive uses (Friedman, 1962; McKinnon, 1973: Shaw, 1973). Thanks to newly elected neoliberal-oriented governments in the USA and UK in the early 1980s, this academic viewpoint was soon embedded in global financial policy. The result was that a new form of ‘financialized’ capitalism came into existence (Epstein, 2005). However, ‘financialization’ turned out to be one of the major disasters of neoliberalism because very many financial institutions changed to become very destructive indeed: they no longer operated to help generate new wealth for all through rising productivity, but increasingly operated simply to redistribute existing wealth into the hands of a narrow investment and financial elite. A hugely risky, economically destructive and inequality-driving dynamic was catalyzed into existence (Harvey, 2004; Galbraith, 2014; Piketty, 2014). This paper extends the analysis of the impact of ‘financialization’ to focus on the local financial system that emerged in the neoliberal era, with the geographical focus on the global south. The paper goes on to identify the core requirements of a post-neoliberal ‘best/better practice’ model of ‘developmental’ local finance for local enterprise development. It centrally argues that there is an urgent need (once more) to ensure that scarce financial resources are locally intermediated into the ‘right’ enterprises that have defined productivity-enhancing and development-driving characteristics related to scale, technology, innovation, high skills, vertical and horizontal connections, employee participation, and the ability to develop new organizational routines and recombine assets in order to locate more productive and cooperative ways of working (Reinert, 2007; see also Bateman, 2013b).Using the many examples of successful local financial systems that have emerged since 1945, especially the case of China, the paper concludes that only by urgently reinventing and restructuring local finance as a ‘developmental’ project will it be possible to begin to address the significant damage created by forty years of local neoliberalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Sustainable Development (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Sustainable Development (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3075417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3075417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

20世纪60年代出现的新一代新自由主义经济学家的核心主张之一,特别是在美国,是市场驱动的私营部门金融机构迄今为止最有效地将资本中介到最具生产力的用途(Friedman, 1962;麦金农,1973;肖,1973)。由于20世纪80年代初美国和英国新当选的以新自由主义为导向的政府,这种学术观点很快就融入了全球金融政策。结果是一种新形式的“金融化”资本主义出现了(Epstein, 2005)。然而,“金融化”被证明是新自由主义的主要灾难之一,因为许多金融机构变得非常具有破坏性:它们不再通过提高生产率来帮助所有人创造新的财富,而是越来越简单地将现有财富重新分配到少数投资和金融精英手中。一个巨大的风险,经济破坏性和不平等驱动的动态催化存在(哈维,2004;加尔布雷斯,2014;Piketty, 2014)。本文扩展了对“金融化”影响的分析,将重点放在新自由主义时代出现的地方金融体系上,并将地理重点放在全球南方。本文接着确定了后新自由主义“最佳/更好实践”模式的核心要求,即为地方企业发展提供“发展性”地方财政。它的核心论点是,迫切需要(再一次)确保稀缺的金融资源在当地为“合适的”企业提供中介,这些企业具有与规模、技术、创新、高技能、纵向和横向联系、员工参与、以及开发新的组织惯例和重组资产的能力,以便找到更富有成效和合作的工作方式(Reinert, 2007;参见Bateman, 2013)。本文以1945年以来出现的许多成功的地方金融体系的例子为例,特别是中国的例子,得出结论认为,只有将地方金融作为一个“发展”项目,紧急地重新发明和重组,才有可能开始解决四十年来地方新自由主义造成的重大损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local Finance for Sustainable Local Enterprise Development: The Role of International Development Assistance in Identifying and Promoting Best Practice in a Post-Neoliberal World
One of the central claims of the new generation of neoliberal economists that emerged in the 1960s, especially in the USA, was that market-driven private sector financial institutions were by far the most effective at intermediating capital into the most productive uses (Friedman, 1962; McKinnon, 1973: Shaw, 1973). Thanks to newly elected neoliberal-oriented governments in the USA and UK in the early 1980s, this academic viewpoint was soon embedded in global financial policy. The result was that a new form of ‘financialized’ capitalism came into existence (Epstein, 2005). However, ‘financialization’ turned out to be one of the major disasters of neoliberalism because very many financial institutions changed to become very destructive indeed: they no longer operated to help generate new wealth for all through rising productivity, but increasingly operated simply to redistribute existing wealth into the hands of a narrow investment and financial elite. A hugely risky, economically destructive and inequality-driving dynamic was catalyzed into existence (Harvey, 2004; Galbraith, 2014; Piketty, 2014). This paper extends the analysis of the impact of ‘financialization’ to focus on the local financial system that emerged in the neoliberal era, with the geographical focus on the global south. The paper goes on to identify the core requirements of a post-neoliberal ‘best/better practice’ model of ‘developmental’ local finance for local enterprise development. It centrally argues that there is an urgent need (once more) to ensure that scarce financial resources are locally intermediated into the ‘right’ enterprises that have defined productivity-enhancing and development-driving characteristics related to scale, technology, innovation, high skills, vertical and horizontal connections, employee participation, and the ability to develop new organizational routines and recombine assets in order to locate more productive and cooperative ways of working (Reinert, 2007; see also Bateman, 2013b).Using the many examples of successful local financial systems that have emerged since 1945, especially the case of China, the paper concludes that only by urgently reinventing and restructuring local finance as a ‘developmental’ project will it be possible to begin to address the significant damage created by forty years of local neoliberalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信