输电塔结构故障诊断中的不确定性检验

A. Mojtahedi, Ghr Ostadi, M. A. L. Yaghin
{"title":"输电塔结构故障诊断中的不确定性检验","authors":"A. Mojtahedi, Ghr Ostadi, M. A. L. Yaghin","doi":"10.14355/IJAPE.2014.0301.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structural damage detection in large‐scaled three dimensional structures is essential for ensuring their safety in service. A robust structural damage detection method must consider the characteristics of the target structure and damage in the development stage. Many identification methods have been proposed and further verified based on experimental data. However, few papers are reported on comparative investigation of several output‐only identification methods, especially based on measured signals from transmission towers. This work is an experimental investigation on a laboratory model of a transmission tower to develop the system identification methods using time series signal for long‐term structural health monitoring purposes. In a comparative investigation of two different methods, the difficulties in implementing damage detection techniques for complex structures has been discussed. The efficiency of the techniques is validated by different damage scenarios foreseen on the physical model. The results show that the developed methods are suitable for damage classification, but the uncertainty effects in the dynamic system must be considered an important factor influencing successful","PeriodicalId":270763,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Automation and Power Engineering","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inspection of Uncertainty Effects on Structural Fault Diagnosing of Transmission Towers\",\"authors\":\"A. Mojtahedi, Ghr Ostadi, M. A. L. Yaghin\",\"doi\":\"10.14355/IJAPE.2014.0301.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Structural damage detection in large‐scaled three dimensional structures is essential for ensuring their safety in service. A robust structural damage detection method must consider the characteristics of the target structure and damage in the development stage. Many identification methods have been proposed and further verified based on experimental data. However, few papers are reported on comparative investigation of several output‐only identification methods, especially based on measured signals from transmission towers. This work is an experimental investigation on a laboratory model of a transmission tower to develop the system identification methods using time series signal for long‐term structural health monitoring purposes. In a comparative investigation of two different methods, the difficulties in implementing damage detection techniques for complex structures has been discussed. The efficiency of the techniques is validated by different damage scenarios foreseen on the physical model. The results show that the developed methods are suitable for damage classification, but the uncertainty effects in the dynamic system must be considered an important factor influencing successful\",\"PeriodicalId\":270763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Automation and Power Engineering\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Automation and Power Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14355/IJAPE.2014.0301.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Automation and Power Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14355/IJAPE.2014.0301.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型三维结构的损伤检测是保证其安全使用的重要手段。一种鲁棒的结构损伤检测方法在研制阶段必须考虑目标结构和损伤的特点。提出了许多识别方法,并在实验数据的基础上进行了进一步验证。然而,很少有论文报道了几种仅输出识别方法的比较研究,特别是基于来自发射塔的测量信号。本研究是对输电塔的实验室模型进行实验研究,以开发用于长期结构健康监测的时间序列信号系统识别方法。在两种不同方法的比较研究中,讨论了复杂结构损伤检测技术实现的困难。通过在物理模型上预测不同的损伤情景,验证了该技术的有效性。结果表明,所建立的方法适用于损伤分类,但动态系统中的不确定性是影响分类成功与否的重要因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inspection of Uncertainty Effects on Structural Fault Diagnosing of Transmission Towers
Structural damage detection in large‐scaled three dimensional structures is essential for ensuring their safety in service. A robust structural damage detection method must consider the characteristics of the target structure and damage in the development stage. Many identification methods have been proposed and further verified based on experimental data. However, few papers are reported on comparative investigation of several output‐only identification methods, especially based on measured signals from transmission towers. This work is an experimental investigation on a laboratory model of a transmission tower to develop the system identification methods using time series signal for long‐term structural health monitoring purposes. In a comparative investigation of two different methods, the difficulties in implementing damage detection techniques for complex structures has been discussed. The efficiency of the techniques is validated by different damage scenarios foreseen on the physical model. The results show that the developed methods are suitable for damage classification, but the uncertainty effects in the dynamic system must be considered an important factor influencing successful
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信