英语教学背景下的视频听力测试和音频听力测试:哪个更适合课堂使用?

C. H. Karjo, M. Winiharti, Safnil Arsyad
{"title":"英语教学背景下的视频听力测试和音频听力测试:哪个更适合课堂使用?","authors":"C. H. Karjo, M. Winiharti, Safnil Arsyad","doi":"10.33369/joall.v7i1.19920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multimodal inputs (both auditory and visual) in the forms of films and videos have long been used in teaching EFL listening comprehension. Previous studies have shown that listening while watching videos can significantly aid students’ comprehension. However, videos were rarely used as testing materials since they contained more than aural input so they did not ‘really’ test listening. This study explored the extent to which multimodal testing materials can be used in testing listening comprehension for EFL students and how the results would differ from that of mono modality testing materials. The participants were 100 students of the English Department, Bina Nusantara University (henceforth Binus) University Jakarta. The researchers gave them two kinds of tests: the video listening test (VLT) and audio listening test (ALT). The materials were two short videos from YouTube. The first test, ALT was given after the participants listened to the videos twice. On the contrary, VLT was administered after they watched the videos twice. To examine the differences in the effects of VLT or ALT on EFL students’ performance in listening comprehension, the data were analyzed quantitatively. The results indicate that students got better scores for VLT compared to ALT. The findings imply that students’ performance in listening comprehension is significantly improved with multimodal testing materials","PeriodicalId":273151,"journal":{"name":"JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video or audio listening tests for English language teaching context: which is more effective for classroom use?\",\"authors\":\"C. H. Karjo, M. Winiharti, Safnil Arsyad\",\"doi\":\"10.33369/joall.v7i1.19920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multimodal inputs (both auditory and visual) in the forms of films and videos have long been used in teaching EFL listening comprehension. Previous studies have shown that listening while watching videos can significantly aid students’ comprehension. However, videos were rarely used as testing materials since they contained more than aural input so they did not ‘really’ test listening. This study explored the extent to which multimodal testing materials can be used in testing listening comprehension for EFL students and how the results would differ from that of mono modality testing materials. The participants were 100 students of the English Department, Bina Nusantara University (henceforth Binus) University Jakarta. The researchers gave them two kinds of tests: the video listening test (VLT) and audio listening test (ALT). The materials were two short videos from YouTube. The first test, ALT was given after the participants listened to the videos twice. On the contrary, VLT was administered after they watched the videos twice. To examine the differences in the effects of VLT or ALT on EFL students’ performance in listening comprehension, the data were analyzed quantitatively. The results indicate that students got better scores for VLT compared to ALT. The findings imply that students’ performance in listening comprehension is significantly improved with multimodal testing materials\",\"PeriodicalId\":273151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v7i1.19920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v7i1.19920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英语听力教学中,以影视形式进行多模态输入(听觉和视觉两种输入)的做法由来已久。先前的研究表明,边听边看视频可以显著地帮助学生理解。然而,视频很少被用作测试材料,因为它们包含的不仅仅是听觉输入,所以它们并不能“真正”测试听力。本研究探讨了多模态测试材料在英语学生听力理解测试中的应用程度,以及测试结果与单模态测试材料的区别。参加者是雅加达比那努桑塔拉大学(以下简称比努斯)大学英语系的100名学生。研究人员给他们进行了两种测试:视频听力测试(VLT)和音频听力测试(ALT)。这些材料是来自YouTube的两个短视频。第一个测试是在参与者听了两遍视频后进行ALT测试。相反,VLT是在他们看了两遍视频后进行的。为了检验VLT和ALT对英语学生听力理解效果的影响差异,我们对数据进行了定量分析。结果表明,学生在多模态测试材料下的听力理解成绩明显高于ALT测试材料
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video or audio listening tests for English language teaching context: which is more effective for classroom use?
Multimodal inputs (both auditory and visual) in the forms of films and videos have long been used in teaching EFL listening comprehension. Previous studies have shown that listening while watching videos can significantly aid students’ comprehension. However, videos were rarely used as testing materials since they contained more than aural input so they did not ‘really’ test listening. This study explored the extent to which multimodal testing materials can be used in testing listening comprehension for EFL students and how the results would differ from that of mono modality testing materials. The participants were 100 students of the English Department, Bina Nusantara University (henceforth Binus) University Jakarta. The researchers gave them two kinds of tests: the video listening test (VLT) and audio listening test (ALT). The materials were two short videos from YouTube. The first test, ALT was given after the participants listened to the videos twice. On the contrary, VLT was administered after they watched the videos twice. To examine the differences in the effects of VLT or ALT on EFL students’ performance in listening comprehension, the data were analyzed quantitatively. The results indicate that students got better scores for VLT compared to ALT. The findings imply that students’ performance in listening comprehension is significantly improved with multimodal testing materials
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信