{"title":"两相环空流动界面剪切模拟","authors":"Ranganathan Kumar, D. Edwards","doi":"10.2172/350939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A new interfacial shear stress model called the law of the interface model, based on the law of the wall approach in turbulent flows, has been developed and locally applied in a fully developed, adiabatic, two-phase annular flow in a duct. Numerical results have been obtained using this model in conjunction with other models available in the literature that are required for the closure of the continuity and momentum equations. These results have been compared with droplet velocity data (using laser Doppler velocimetry and hot film anemometry), void fraction data (using gamma densitometry) and pressure drop data obtained in a R-134A refrigerant test facility. Droplet velocity results match the experimental data well, however, the prediction of the void fraction is less accurate. The poor prediction of void fraction, especially for the low void fraction cases, appears to be due to the lack of a good mechanistic model for entrainment.","PeriodicalId":324954,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer: Volume 3 — Experimental Studies in Multiphase Flow; Multiphase Flow in Porous Media; Experimental Multiphase Flows and Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flows; Fundamental Aspects of Experimental Methods","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interfacial Shear Modelling in Two-Phase Annular Flow\",\"authors\":\"Ranganathan Kumar, D. Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.2172/350939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A new interfacial shear stress model called the law of the interface model, based on the law of the wall approach in turbulent flows, has been developed and locally applied in a fully developed, adiabatic, two-phase annular flow in a duct. Numerical results have been obtained using this model in conjunction with other models available in the literature that are required for the closure of the continuity and momentum equations. These results have been compared with droplet velocity data (using laser Doppler velocimetry and hot film anemometry), void fraction data (using gamma densitometry) and pressure drop data obtained in a R-134A refrigerant test facility. Droplet velocity results match the experimental data well, however, the prediction of the void fraction is less accurate. The poor prediction of void fraction, especially for the low void fraction cases, appears to be due to the lack of a good mechanistic model for entrainment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heat Transfer: Volume 3 — Experimental Studies in Multiphase Flow; Multiphase Flow in Porous Media; Experimental Multiphase Flows and Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flows; Fundamental Aspects of Experimental Methods\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heat Transfer: Volume 3 — Experimental Studies in Multiphase Flow; Multiphase Flow in Porous Media; Experimental Multiphase Flows and Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flows; Fundamental Aspects of Experimental Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2172/350939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer: Volume 3 — Experimental Studies in Multiphase Flow; Multiphase Flow in Porous Media; Experimental Multiphase Flows and Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flows; Fundamental Aspects of Experimental Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2172/350939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interfacial Shear Modelling in Two-Phase Annular Flow
A new interfacial shear stress model called the law of the interface model, based on the law of the wall approach in turbulent flows, has been developed and locally applied in a fully developed, adiabatic, two-phase annular flow in a duct. Numerical results have been obtained using this model in conjunction with other models available in the literature that are required for the closure of the continuity and momentum equations. These results have been compared with droplet velocity data (using laser Doppler velocimetry and hot film anemometry), void fraction data (using gamma densitometry) and pressure drop data obtained in a R-134A refrigerant test facility. Droplet velocity results match the experimental data well, however, the prediction of the void fraction is less accurate. The poor prediction of void fraction, especially for the low void fraction cases, appears to be due to the lack of a good mechanistic model for entrainment.