深度学习基础CNN Untuk Pengenalan Pola部分放电硅橡胶

Ferlian Seftianto, Sukemi Sukemi, Zainuddin Nawawi
{"title":"深度学习基础CNN Untuk Pengenalan Pola部分放电硅橡胶","authors":"Ferlian Seftianto, Sukemi Sukemi, Zainuddin Nawawi","doi":"10.31598/sintechjournal.v6i2.1390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Partial discharge (PD) activity measurements have been carried out by selecting noise signals (de-noising) using Support Vector Machine (SVM)and then recognized using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). CNN testing was carried out using various models such as activation methods: Sigmoid, Softmax, Relu, Tanh, Swish. Number of layers used is 1, 2, 3, 4 with filter sizes of 32, 64, 128, 256  and kernel sizes 3x3, 2x2, 1x1, 1x2,  1x3 in the MaxPooling and AveragePooling pooling methods. The results obtained, On sigmoid method the MaxPooling and AveragePooling with  1 layers  having a low accuracy around 14.40% but the other layers configurations gets a high accuracy around 98.99% both has been done with or without de-noising. In Softmax activation method, MaxPooling pooling method has an accuracy around 84.94% and has de-noising 90.66%. The AveragePooling pooling method has an accuracy 65.25% and around 75.29% with de-noised. The result shows that SVM de-noising increases the accuracy around 11.12% in the Softmax activation method. In the Tanh, Relu, and Swish activation methods, a low level of accuracy is obtained with an average of 14.40%, and SVM de-noising doesn’t increase the accuracy, so CNN-based deep learning with SVM de-noising is more suitable using the Sigmoid and Softmax.","PeriodicalId":302091,"journal":{"name":"SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning Berbasis CNN Untuk Pengenalan Pola Partial Discharge Isolasi Silicone Rubber\",\"authors\":\"Ferlian Seftianto, Sukemi Sukemi, Zainuddin Nawawi\",\"doi\":\"10.31598/sintechjournal.v6i2.1390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Partial discharge (PD) activity measurements have been carried out by selecting noise signals (de-noising) using Support Vector Machine (SVM)and then recognized using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). CNN testing was carried out using various models such as activation methods: Sigmoid, Softmax, Relu, Tanh, Swish. Number of layers used is 1, 2, 3, 4 with filter sizes of 32, 64, 128, 256  and kernel sizes 3x3, 2x2, 1x1, 1x2,  1x3 in the MaxPooling and AveragePooling pooling methods. The results obtained, On sigmoid method the MaxPooling and AveragePooling with  1 layers  having a low accuracy around 14.40% but the other layers configurations gets a high accuracy around 98.99% both has been done with or without de-noising. In Softmax activation method, MaxPooling pooling method has an accuracy around 84.94% and has de-noising 90.66%. The AveragePooling pooling method has an accuracy 65.25% and around 75.29% with de-noised. The result shows that SVM de-noising increases the accuracy around 11.12% in the Softmax activation method. In the Tanh, Relu, and Swish activation methods, a low level of accuracy is obtained with an average of 14.40%, and SVM de-noising doesn’t increase the accuracy, so CNN-based deep learning with SVM de-noising is more suitable using the Sigmoid and Softmax.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31598/sintechjournal.v6i2.1390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31598/sintechjournal.v6i2.1390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

局部放电(PD)活度测量采用支持向量机(SVM)选择噪声信号(去噪),然后使用卷积神经网络(CNN)进行识别。CNN测试使用了多种模型,如激活方法:Sigmoid, Softmax, Relu, Tanh, Swish。在MaxPooling和AveragePooling池化方法中,使用的层数为1,2,3,4,过滤器大小为32、64、128、256,内核大小为3x3、2x2、1x1、1x2、1x3。结果表明,在sigmoid方法上,1层的MaxPooling和AveragePooling具有14.40%左右的低精度,而其他层配置具有98.99%左右的高精度,两者都已完成或不进行去噪。在Softmax激活方法中,MaxPooling池化方法的准确率约为84.94%,去噪率为90.66%。平均池化方法的准确率为65.25%,去噪后的准确率约为75.29%。结果表明,SVM去噪后,Softmax激活方法的准确率提高了11.12%左右。在Tanh、Relu和Swish激活方法中,准确率较低,平均为14.40%,支持向量机去噪并没有提高准确率,因此基于cnn的深度学习与支持向量机去噪更适合使用Sigmoid和Softmax。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning Berbasis CNN Untuk Pengenalan Pola Partial Discharge Isolasi Silicone Rubber
Partial discharge (PD) activity measurements have been carried out by selecting noise signals (de-noising) using Support Vector Machine (SVM)and then recognized using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). CNN testing was carried out using various models such as activation methods: Sigmoid, Softmax, Relu, Tanh, Swish. Number of layers used is 1, 2, 3, 4 with filter sizes of 32, 64, 128, 256  and kernel sizes 3x3, 2x2, 1x1, 1x2,  1x3 in the MaxPooling and AveragePooling pooling methods. The results obtained, On sigmoid method the MaxPooling and AveragePooling with  1 layers  having a low accuracy around 14.40% but the other layers configurations gets a high accuracy around 98.99% both has been done with or without de-noising. In Softmax activation method, MaxPooling pooling method has an accuracy around 84.94% and has de-noising 90.66%. The AveragePooling pooling method has an accuracy 65.25% and around 75.29% with de-noised. The result shows that SVM de-noising increases the accuracy around 11.12% in the Softmax activation method. In the Tanh, Relu, and Swish activation methods, a low level of accuracy is obtained with an average of 14.40%, and SVM de-noising doesn’t increase the accuracy, so CNN-based deep learning with SVM de-noising is more suitable using the Sigmoid and Softmax.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信