弧长纵横比选择的数学基础

Fubo Han, Yunhai Wang, Jian Zhang, O. Deussen, Baoquan Chen
{"title":"弧长纵横比选择的数学基础","authors":"Fubo Han, Yunhai Wang, Jian Zhang, O. Deussen, Baoquan Chen","doi":"10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2016.7465245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aspect ratio of a plot can strongly influence the perception of trends in the data. Arc length based aspect ratio selection (AL) has demonstrated many empirical advantages over previous methods. However, it is still not clear why and when this method works. In this paper, we attempt to unravel its mystery by exploring its mathematical foundation. First, we explain the rationale why this method is parameterization invariant and follow the same rationale to extend previous methods which are not parameterization invariant. As such, we propose maximizing weighted local curvature (MLC), a parameterization invariant form of local orientation resolution (LOR) and reveal the theoretical connection between average slope (AS) and resultant vector (RV). Furthermore, we establish a mathematical connection between AL and banking to 45 degrees and derive the upper and lower bounds of its average absolute slopes. Finally, we conduct a quantitative comparison that revises the understanding of aspect ratio selection methods in three aspects: (1) showing that AL, AWO and RV always perform very similarly while MS is not; (2) demonstrating the advantages in the robustness of RV over AL; (3) providing a counterexample where all previous methods produce poor results while MLC works well.","PeriodicalId":129600,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical foundations of arc length-based aspect ratio selection\",\"authors\":\"Fubo Han, Yunhai Wang, Jian Zhang, O. Deussen, Baoquan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2016.7465245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aspect ratio of a plot can strongly influence the perception of trends in the data. Arc length based aspect ratio selection (AL) has demonstrated many empirical advantages over previous methods. However, it is still not clear why and when this method works. In this paper, we attempt to unravel its mystery by exploring its mathematical foundation. First, we explain the rationale why this method is parameterization invariant and follow the same rationale to extend previous methods which are not parameterization invariant. As such, we propose maximizing weighted local curvature (MLC), a parameterization invariant form of local orientation resolution (LOR) and reveal the theoretical connection between average slope (AS) and resultant vector (RV). Furthermore, we establish a mathematical connection between AL and banking to 45 degrees and derive the upper and lower bounds of its average absolute slopes. Finally, we conduct a quantitative comparison that revises the understanding of aspect ratio selection methods in three aspects: (1) showing that AL, AWO and RV always perform very similarly while MS is not; (2) demonstrating the advantages in the robustness of RV over AL; (3) providing a counterexample where all previous methods produce poor results while MLC works well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2016.7465245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2016.7465245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

图的纵横比可以强烈地影响对数据趋势的感知。基于弧长的纵横比选择(AL)与以往的方法相比显示出许多经验优势。然而,目前还不清楚为什么以及何时这种方法起作用。本文试图通过探究其数学基础来揭开其神秘面纱。首先,我们解释了为什么该方法是参数化不变的基本原理,并遵循相同的基本原理来扩展以前的非参数化不变的方法。因此,我们提出了最大化加权局部曲率(MLC),这是局部定向分辨率(LOR)的一种参数化不变形式,并揭示了平均斜率(As)和合成向量(RV)之间的理论联系。此外,我们建立了人工智能与45度倾斜度之间的数学联系,并推导了其平均绝对斜率的上界和下界。最后,我们进行了定量比较,从三个方面修正了对纵横比选择方法的理解:(1)表明AL、AWO和RV的表现总是非常相似,而MS则不是;(2)证明了RV相对于AL的鲁棒性优势;(3)提供一个反例,其中所有先前的方法产生较差的结果,而MLC工作良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mathematical foundations of arc length-based aspect ratio selection
The aspect ratio of a plot can strongly influence the perception of trends in the data. Arc length based aspect ratio selection (AL) has demonstrated many empirical advantages over previous methods. However, it is still not clear why and when this method works. In this paper, we attempt to unravel its mystery by exploring its mathematical foundation. First, we explain the rationale why this method is parameterization invariant and follow the same rationale to extend previous methods which are not parameterization invariant. As such, we propose maximizing weighted local curvature (MLC), a parameterization invariant form of local orientation resolution (LOR) and reveal the theoretical connection between average slope (AS) and resultant vector (RV). Furthermore, we establish a mathematical connection between AL and banking to 45 degrees and derive the upper and lower bounds of its average absolute slopes. Finally, we conduct a quantitative comparison that revises the understanding of aspect ratio selection methods in three aspects: (1) showing that AL, AWO and RV always perform very similarly while MS is not; (2) demonstrating the advantages in the robustness of RV over AL; (3) providing a counterexample where all previous methods produce poor results while MLC works well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信