让政治经济学回归

M. Thompson
{"title":"让政治经济学回归","authors":"M. Thompson","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198788232.013.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that the current literature on meaningful work underplays and mostly overlooks the importance of institutional arrangements in structuring opportunities for meaningful work. It sets out different theories of comparative institutionalism (rational choice, historical, sociological, and constructivist) and explores their implications for future research on meaningful work. Three pathways are identified for promoting meaningful work: (1) develop institutional arrangements that encourage social actors to cooperate to develop meaningful work as a societal goal, supported by an enabling state; (2) strengthen collective bargaining and employee representation; and (3) develop social movement strategies drawing together academics, policymakers, employer organizations, consultants, social media, and commentators to shape a new discourse and wider societal narrative on the importance of opportunities for meaningful work.","PeriodicalId":336620,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Meaningful Work","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing Political Economy Back In\",\"authors\":\"M. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198788232.013.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter argues that the current literature on meaningful work underplays and mostly overlooks the importance of institutional arrangements in structuring opportunities for meaningful work. It sets out different theories of comparative institutionalism (rational choice, historical, sociological, and constructivist) and explores their implications for future research on meaningful work. Three pathways are identified for promoting meaningful work: (1) develop institutional arrangements that encourage social actors to cooperate to develop meaningful work as a societal goal, supported by an enabling state; (2) strengthen collective bargaining and employee representation; and (3) develop social movement strategies drawing together academics, policymakers, employer organizations, consultants, social media, and commentators to shape a new discourse and wider societal narrative on the importance of opportunities for meaningful work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Meaningful Work\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Meaningful Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198788232.013.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Meaningful Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198788232.013.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章认为,目前关于有意义工作的文献低估了,而且大多忽视了制度安排在构建有意义工作机会方面的重要性。它阐述了比较制度主义的不同理论(理性选择、历史、社会学和建构主义),并探讨了它们对未来有意义工作研究的影响。本文确定了促进有意义工作的三种途径:(1)制定制度安排,鼓励社会行为者合作,将有意义的工作作为一个社会目标,并得到国家的支持;(2)加强集体谈判和员工代表;(3)制定社会运动策略,将学者、政策制定者、雇主组织、顾问、社交媒体和评论员聚集在一起,就有意义的工作机会的重要性形成新的话语和更广泛的社会叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bringing Political Economy Back In
This chapter argues that the current literature on meaningful work underplays and mostly overlooks the importance of institutional arrangements in structuring opportunities for meaningful work. It sets out different theories of comparative institutionalism (rational choice, historical, sociological, and constructivist) and explores their implications for future research on meaningful work. Three pathways are identified for promoting meaningful work: (1) develop institutional arrangements that encourage social actors to cooperate to develop meaningful work as a societal goal, supported by an enabling state; (2) strengthen collective bargaining and employee representation; and (3) develop social movement strategies drawing together academics, policymakers, employer organizations, consultants, social media, and commentators to shape a new discourse and wider societal narrative on the importance of opportunities for meaningful work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信