奉献的舞蹈身体:Bharata Natyam的流动手势

Kimerer L. Lamothe
{"title":"奉献的舞蹈身体:Bharata Natyam的流动手势","authors":"Kimerer L. Lamothe","doi":"10.1558/BAR.35773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this thoughtful and finely crafted work, Katherine Zubko accomplishes a feat that few in the field of religious studies have managed to do: she keeps dance centre stage from beginning to end of her book, and not just as an object to analyse but as a practice capable of generating complex theoretical ideas. In so doing, Zubko levels a sturdy blow against a bulwark of the colonial era that continues to produce affects in the field of religious studies and beyond: a refusal to acknowledge ‘dance’ as ‘religion’. The dance at the heart of Zubko’s book is Bharata Natyam, arguably the most popular and well known form of Indian ‘classical’ dance, emblem of Indian (mostly Hindu) unity, whose own history is indelibly marked by the colonial project. As Zubko relates, nationalists and reformers in midtwentieth century India sought to resurrect and codify the dance traditions of the devadasis, who had been cast out of Hindu temples by British rulers. The reformers invented the name ‘Bharata Natyam’ for the technique they (re)constructed as a way to affirm its direct line to authoritative texts in the Hindu tradition, most notably, Bharata’s second century Nāṭyaśāstra. Zubko does not linger on this history. As she notes, it has been ably told by others. Instead, she focuses on a hand-picked group of contemporary practitioners of Bharata Natyam who use the term bhakti rasa to hold open a space for what many scholars claim was lost in the transition of the","PeriodicalId":247531,"journal":{"name":"Body and Religion","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dancing Bodies of Devotion: Fluid Gestures in Bharata Natyam\",\"authors\":\"Kimerer L. Lamothe\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/BAR.35773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this thoughtful and finely crafted work, Katherine Zubko accomplishes a feat that few in the field of religious studies have managed to do: she keeps dance centre stage from beginning to end of her book, and not just as an object to analyse but as a practice capable of generating complex theoretical ideas. In so doing, Zubko levels a sturdy blow against a bulwark of the colonial era that continues to produce affects in the field of religious studies and beyond: a refusal to acknowledge ‘dance’ as ‘religion’. The dance at the heart of Zubko’s book is Bharata Natyam, arguably the most popular and well known form of Indian ‘classical’ dance, emblem of Indian (mostly Hindu) unity, whose own history is indelibly marked by the colonial project. As Zubko relates, nationalists and reformers in midtwentieth century India sought to resurrect and codify the dance traditions of the devadasis, who had been cast out of Hindu temples by British rulers. The reformers invented the name ‘Bharata Natyam’ for the technique they (re)constructed as a way to affirm its direct line to authoritative texts in the Hindu tradition, most notably, Bharata’s second century Nāṭyaśāstra. Zubko does not linger on this history. As she notes, it has been ably told by others. Instead, she focuses on a hand-picked group of contemporary practitioners of Bharata Natyam who use the term bhakti rasa to hold open a space for what many scholars claim was lost in the transition of the\",\"PeriodicalId\":247531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Body and Religion\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Body and Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/BAR.35773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/BAR.35773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这部深思熟虑、精雕细琢的作品中,凯瑟琳·祖布科(Katherine Zubko)完成了一项在宗教研究领域很少有人能做到的壮举:她从头到尾都把舞蹈放在中心舞台上,不仅作为一个分析对象,而且作为一种能够产生复杂理论思想的实践。在这样做的过程中,祖布科对殖民时代的堡垒进行了有力的打击,这一堡垒继续在宗教研究领域内外产生影响:拒绝承认“舞蹈”是“宗教”。Zubko书中的核心舞蹈是Bharata Natyam,可以说是印度“古典”舞蹈中最受欢迎和最知名的形式,是印度(主要是印度教)团结的象征,其自身的历史也被殖民项目不可磨灭地打上了烙印。正如祖布科所述,20世纪中期,印度的民族主义者和改革者试图复兴和编纂女奴的舞蹈传统,女奴被英国统治者赶出印度教寺庙。改革者为他们(重新)构建的技术发明了“Bharata Natyam”这个名字,作为一种确认其与印度教传统权威文本直接联系的方式,最值得注意的是,Bharata的第二世纪Nāṭyaśāstra。祖布科并没有对这段历史念念不忘。正如她所指出的那样,其他人已经巧妙地讲述了这个故事。相反,她关注的是一群精心挑选的当代巴拉塔·纳提亚姆(Bharata Natyam)实践者,他们使用巴克提·拉萨(bhakti rasa)一词,为许多学者声称在印度文化转型中丢失的东西开辟了一个空间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dancing Bodies of Devotion: Fluid Gestures in Bharata Natyam
In this thoughtful and finely crafted work, Katherine Zubko accomplishes a feat that few in the field of religious studies have managed to do: she keeps dance centre stage from beginning to end of her book, and not just as an object to analyse but as a practice capable of generating complex theoretical ideas. In so doing, Zubko levels a sturdy blow against a bulwark of the colonial era that continues to produce affects in the field of religious studies and beyond: a refusal to acknowledge ‘dance’ as ‘religion’. The dance at the heart of Zubko’s book is Bharata Natyam, arguably the most popular and well known form of Indian ‘classical’ dance, emblem of Indian (mostly Hindu) unity, whose own history is indelibly marked by the colonial project. As Zubko relates, nationalists and reformers in midtwentieth century India sought to resurrect and codify the dance traditions of the devadasis, who had been cast out of Hindu temples by British rulers. The reformers invented the name ‘Bharata Natyam’ for the technique they (re)constructed as a way to affirm its direct line to authoritative texts in the Hindu tradition, most notably, Bharata’s second century Nāṭyaśāstra. Zubko does not linger on this history. As she notes, it has been ably told by others. Instead, she focuses on a hand-picked group of contemporary practitioners of Bharata Natyam who use the term bhakti rasa to hold open a space for what many scholars claim was lost in the transition of the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信