Raniah Shakir Al Anssari, Haider Saad Yahya Jubran
{"title":"阿拉伯语的状语宾格","authors":"Raniah Shakir Al Anssari, Haider Saad Yahya Jubran","doi":"10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.4.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe accusative case is mainly attached the objects. It is the case that marks objects in transitive clauses however, in many languages accusative case is not only found on objects, but it is extended to mark NP adverbials. It is attached to elements outside the domain the verb. Consider the example from Arabic below. \n\n\n(1) ðahab-tu ʔila al-madiinat-I layl-an\n\n\nwent- Is to the-city-gen night-acc\n\n\n‘I went to the city at night’\n\n\nIn the example above, we find the word layl-an ‘at night’ is marked with accusative case though it is not an argument. It is adverb of time. The occurrence of case on adjuncts has been termed adverbial case or semantic case. It should be noted that this type of case has not received much attention in the literature of the modern linguistics. Only a few studies have been conducted to investigate this phenomenon. When discussing some examples about the adverbial case, Butt (2006, p. 7) states the following “Given has basic assumption that the primary purpose of case is to mark the arguments of a predicate this type of data remains an issuer which has not as yet received a good/standard solution within modern syntactic theories.” By this type of data, she refers to some data German and Korean where some adverbials are marked with accusative case. So, this issue has not been dealt with in some detail in modern linguistics as also stated by Butt in another context: “Very little work has been done on semantic case, primarily because it tends to be associated with adjuncts, and the theoretical concern is with licensing and constraining the appearance of core verbal arguments” (p.71).\n","PeriodicalId":204201,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverbial Accusative Case in Arabic\",\"authors\":\"Raniah Shakir Al Anssari, Haider Saad Yahya Jubran\",\"doi\":\"10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.4.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe accusative case is mainly attached the objects. It is the case that marks objects in transitive clauses however, in many languages accusative case is not only found on objects, but it is extended to mark NP adverbials. It is attached to elements outside the domain the verb. Consider the example from Arabic below. \\n\\n\\n(1) ðahab-tu ʔila al-madiinat-I layl-an\\n\\n\\nwent- Is to the-city-gen night-acc\\n\\n\\n‘I went to the city at night’\\n\\n\\nIn the example above, we find the word layl-an ‘at night’ is marked with accusative case though it is not an argument. It is adverb of time. The occurrence of case on adjuncts has been termed adverbial case or semantic case. It should be noted that this type of case has not received much attention in the literature of the modern linguistics. Only a few studies have been conducted to investigate this phenomenon. When discussing some examples about the adverbial case, Butt (2006, p. 7) states the following “Given has basic assumption that the primary purpose of case is to mark the arguments of a predicate this type of data remains an issuer which has not as yet received a good/standard solution within modern syntactic theories.” By this type of data, she refers to some data German and Korean where some adverbials are marked with accusative case. So, this issue has not been dealt with in some detail in modern linguistics as also stated by Butt in another context: “Very little work has been done on semantic case, primarily because it tends to be associated with adjuncts, and the theoretical concern is with licensing and constraining the appearance of core verbal arguments” (p.71).\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":204201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.4.75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Language and Culture Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.4.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
宾格主要附在宾语上。在及物从句中标记宾语是一种常见的情况,但在许多语言中,宾格不仅用于标记宾语,而且还扩展到标记NP状语。它附加到谓词域外的元素上。考虑下面来自阿拉伯语的例子。在上面的例子中,我们发现单词layl-an“at night”被标注为宾格,尽管它不是一个论证。它是时间副词。修饰语上的格的出现被称为状语格或语义格。值得注意的是,这类案例在现代语言学文献中并没有受到太多的关注。对这一现象进行调查的研究很少。在讨论关于状语格的一些例子时,Butt (2006, p. 7)指出:“给定的基本假设是,状语格的主要目的是标记谓词的参数,这种类型的数据仍然是一个在现代语法理论中尚未得到良好/标准解决方案的发布者。”这种类型的数据,她指的是德语和韩语的一些数据,这些数据中有些状语标注了宾格。因此,这个问题在现代语言学中并没有得到详细的处理,正如Butt在另一篇文章中所说的那样:“关于语义格的研究很少,主要是因为它往往与辅助词有关,而理论关注的是允许和限制核心言语论证的出现”(第71页)。
The accusative case is mainly attached the objects. It is the case that marks objects in transitive clauses however, in many languages accusative case is not only found on objects, but it is extended to mark NP adverbials. It is attached to elements outside the domain the verb. Consider the example from Arabic below.
(1) ðahab-tu ʔila al-madiinat-I layl-an
went- Is to the-city-gen night-acc
‘I went to the city at night’
In the example above, we find the word layl-an ‘at night’ is marked with accusative case though it is not an argument. It is adverb of time. The occurrence of case on adjuncts has been termed adverbial case or semantic case. It should be noted that this type of case has not received much attention in the literature of the modern linguistics. Only a few studies have been conducted to investigate this phenomenon. When discussing some examples about the adverbial case, Butt (2006, p. 7) states the following “Given has basic assumption that the primary purpose of case is to mark the arguments of a predicate this type of data remains an issuer which has not as yet received a good/standard solution within modern syntactic theories.” By this type of data, she refers to some data German and Korean where some adverbials are marked with accusative case. So, this issue has not been dealt with in some detail in modern linguistics as also stated by Butt in another context: “Very little work has been done on semantic case, primarily because it tends to be associated with adjuncts, and the theoretical concern is with licensing and constraining the appearance of core verbal arguments” (p.71).