正式的城市主义:来自德里的案例

N. P. Narayanan
{"title":"正式的城市主义:来自德里的案例","authors":"N. P. Narayanan","doi":"10.33055/georegards.2018-2019.011-012.01.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This thesis attempts to critically engage with urbanization processes through the lens of informality. That is, urban informality as an enduring concept that defines, describes, and delineates urban development. Using case studies from Delhi, it theorizes informality as a practice and seeks to understand its complex social and power dynamics. The research, based on secondary archival and primary qualitative data, shows the role of informality in the production of space, the everyday politics and reasoning of those who are involved in such practices. This thesis develops on how urban informality forms a critical lens in understanding the urbanization process in India rather than understanding informality via the urbanization process. It is broken down into three components, each of which yields a different scale to the analysis.\nThe first component explores the discursive construction of slums in the Indian parliamentary debates. The slum is a contested settlement category, which provides a very specific illustration of urban informality’s contested notions.\nThis section analyses the debates related to slums from the upper house (Rajya Sabha) of the Indian Parliament over a period of 61 years from 1953 until 2014. Using a Foucauldian framework of governmentality and biopolitics, this part outlines the historical progression of the debates, the rationale around conceptualization of slums, and how they transformed into actions via policy and/or legislation. This section analyses the discursive transformation of the notion of slums from a political subject to a technical object and in the process, how the state makes itself indispensable to deal with urban informality.\nThe second component investigates the role of urban informality in producing the city. It takes the informal dumpling (momos) manufacturing-and-selling sector in Delhi’s Chirag Dilli settlement as a case study. Building on a Lefebvrian conceptualization of space, it illustrates how this particular informal cottage industry contributes to the social production of the city as well as of the physical settlement in which it is located. The results show, first, how the built form of the inhabited settlement gets co-produced with newer living patterns and building typologies. Second, they demonstrate the contribution of\n \nAbstract\n\n\ninformality to the production of the city. Thus, taking an alternate narrative to the state or the conflict with the state being the primary agent in the production of the city.\nThe third component of the research aims to understand how informality is being produced, and why the same actors oscillate between formal and informal practices. In this regard, a study of water supply management and solid waste management in and around the slum settlement of Jagdamba Camp is taken as a case study. This part of the thesis theorizes informality as a practice using Bourdieu and demonstrates through the case study that the production of informality is a highly varied and nuanced process. It takes the urban infrastructure as a medium to understand social and political aspects of the society. The results argue that informality as a practice is not completely dependent on the habitus of the actors, but on the rules of the field in which these actors operate. This opens the analytical possibility to understand how and why the same actors practice both formality and informality in different fields.\nThe three components are the core chapters of this thesis-by-article. They come together in understanding the urbanization process via informality rather than using formal urbanization to understand informality. The first part outlines the larger historical development of informality resulting in various state legislations. The following two components outline how the people cope, adapt, and influence these legislations resulting in a distinct urbanization process.\nThe overall results are framed using perspectives from southern theory and show how informal practices are universal, but these practices get differentially connoted and acted upon.","PeriodicalId":371109,"journal":{"name":"Géo-Regards","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In/formal urbanism : Cases drawn from Delhi\",\"authors\":\"N. P. Narayanan\",\"doi\":\"10.33055/georegards.2018-2019.011-012.01.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This thesis attempts to critically engage with urbanization processes through the lens of informality. That is, urban informality as an enduring concept that defines, describes, and delineates urban development. Using case studies from Delhi, it theorizes informality as a practice and seeks to understand its complex social and power dynamics. The research, based on secondary archival and primary qualitative data, shows the role of informality in the production of space, the everyday politics and reasoning of those who are involved in such practices. This thesis develops on how urban informality forms a critical lens in understanding the urbanization process in India rather than understanding informality via the urbanization process. It is broken down into three components, each of which yields a different scale to the analysis.\\nThe first component explores the discursive construction of slums in the Indian parliamentary debates. The slum is a contested settlement category, which provides a very specific illustration of urban informality’s contested notions.\\nThis section analyses the debates related to slums from the upper house (Rajya Sabha) of the Indian Parliament over a period of 61 years from 1953 until 2014. Using a Foucauldian framework of governmentality and biopolitics, this part outlines the historical progression of the debates, the rationale around conceptualization of slums, and how they transformed into actions via policy and/or legislation. This section analyses the discursive transformation of the notion of slums from a political subject to a technical object and in the process, how the state makes itself indispensable to deal with urban informality.\\nThe second component investigates the role of urban informality in producing the city. It takes the informal dumpling (momos) manufacturing-and-selling sector in Delhi’s Chirag Dilli settlement as a case study. Building on a Lefebvrian conceptualization of space, it illustrates how this particular informal cottage industry contributes to the social production of the city as well as of the physical settlement in which it is located. The results show, first, how the built form of the inhabited settlement gets co-produced with newer living patterns and building typologies. Second, they demonstrate the contribution of\\n \\nAbstract\\n\\n\\ninformality to the production of the city. Thus, taking an alternate narrative to the state or the conflict with the state being the primary agent in the production of the city.\\nThe third component of the research aims to understand how informality is being produced, and why the same actors oscillate between formal and informal practices. In this regard, a study of water supply management and solid waste management in and around the slum settlement of Jagdamba Camp is taken as a case study. This part of the thesis theorizes informality as a practice using Bourdieu and demonstrates through the case study that the production of informality is a highly varied and nuanced process. It takes the urban infrastructure as a medium to understand social and political aspects of the society. The results argue that informality as a practice is not completely dependent on the habitus of the actors, but on the rules of the field in which these actors operate. This opens the analytical possibility to understand how and why the same actors practice both formality and informality in different fields.\\nThe three components are the core chapters of this thesis-by-article. They come together in understanding the urbanization process via informality rather than using formal urbanization to understand informality. The first part outlines the larger historical development of informality resulting in various state legislations. The following two components outline how the people cope, adapt, and influence these legislations resulting in a distinct urbanization process.\\nThe overall results are framed using perspectives from southern theory and show how informal practices are universal, but these practices get differentially connoted and acted upon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Géo-Regards\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Géo-Regards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33055/georegards.2018-2019.011-012.01.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Géo-Regards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33055/georegards.2018-2019.011-012.01.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图通过非正式性的视角批判性地参与城市化进程。也就是说,城市非正式性作为一个定义、描述和描绘城市发展的持久概念。利用来自德里的案例研究,它将非正式作为一种实践理论化,并试图理解其复杂的社会和权力动态。该研究基于二手档案和第一手定性数据,展示了非正式性在空间生产中的作用,以及参与此类实践的人的日常政治和推理。本文的发展是关于城市非正式性如何形成理解印度城市化进程的关键镜头,而不是通过城市化进程来理解非正式性。它被分解成三个组成部分,每个组成部分产生不同的分析尺度。第一部分探讨了印度议会辩论中贫民窟的话语建构。贫民窟是一个有争议的定居类别,它为城市非正式性有争议的概念提供了一个非常具体的例证。本节分析了从1953年到2014年61年间,印度议会上院(Rajya Sabha)关于贫民窟的辩论。本部分采用福柯式的治理和生命政治学框架,概述了辩论的历史进程、贫民窟概念化的基本原理,以及它们如何通过政策和/或立法转化为行动。本节分析了贫民窟概念从一个政治主体到一个技术客体的话语转换,以及在这个过程中,国家如何使自己成为处理城市非正式性不可或缺的一部分。第二部分探讨了城市非正式性在城市形成中的作用。它以德里奇拉格迪利定居点的非正式饺子(momos)制造和销售部门为例进行了研究。它以列非孚式的空间概念为基础,说明了这种特殊的非正式家庭手工业如何为城市的社会生产以及它所处的物理定居点做出贡献。研究结果表明,首先,居住区的建筑形式是如何与更新的生活模式和建筑类型共同产生的。其次,它们展示了抽象形式对城市生产的贡献。因此,采取另一种叙事方式,将国家或与国家的冲突作为城市生产的主要代理人。研究的第三个组成部分旨在了解非正式性是如何产生的,以及为什么相同的参与者在正式和非正式实践之间摇摆不定。在这方面,对Jagdamba难民营贫民窟及其周围的供水管理和固体废物管理进行了研究,作为个案研究。这一部分运用布迪厄的理论将非正式性作为一种实践,并通过案例研究证明非正式性的产生是一个高度变化和微妙的过程。它以城市基础设施为媒介来理解社会的社会和政治方面。研究结果表明,作为一种实践,非正式行为并不完全取决于行为者的习惯,而是取决于这些行为者所处领域的规则。这开启了分析的可能性,以理解相同的演员如何以及为什么在不同的领域实践正式和非正式。这三个部分是本文的核心章节。他们通过非正式性来理解城市化过程,而不是用正式的城市化来理解非正式性。第一部分概述了导致各种州立法的非正式性的更大的历史发展。以下两个部分概述了人们如何应对、适应和影响这些立法,从而导致独特的城市化进程。总体结果是使用南方理论的观点框架,并显示了非正式实践是如何普遍的,但这些实践的内涵和行动是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In/formal urbanism : Cases drawn from Delhi
This thesis attempts to critically engage with urbanization processes through the lens of informality. That is, urban informality as an enduring concept that defines, describes, and delineates urban development. Using case studies from Delhi, it theorizes informality as a practice and seeks to understand its complex social and power dynamics. The research, based on secondary archival and primary qualitative data, shows the role of informality in the production of space, the everyday politics and reasoning of those who are involved in such practices. This thesis develops on how urban informality forms a critical lens in understanding the urbanization process in India rather than understanding informality via the urbanization process. It is broken down into three components, each of which yields a different scale to the analysis. The first component explores the discursive construction of slums in the Indian parliamentary debates. The slum is a contested settlement category, which provides a very specific illustration of urban informality’s contested notions. This section analyses the debates related to slums from the upper house (Rajya Sabha) of the Indian Parliament over a period of 61 years from 1953 until 2014. Using a Foucauldian framework of governmentality and biopolitics, this part outlines the historical progression of the debates, the rationale around conceptualization of slums, and how they transformed into actions via policy and/or legislation. This section analyses the discursive transformation of the notion of slums from a political subject to a technical object and in the process, how the state makes itself indispensable to deal with urban informality. The second component investigates the role of urban informality in producing the city. It takes the informal dumpling (momos) manufacturing-and-selling sector in Delhi’s Chirag Dilli settlement as a case study. Building on a Lefebvrian conceptualization of space, it illustrates how this particular informal cottage industry contributes to the social production of the city as well as of the physical settlement in which it is located. The results show, first, how the built form of the inhabited settlement gets co-produced with newer living patterns and building typologies. Second, they demonstrate the contribution of Abstract informality to the production of the city. Thus, taking an alternate narrative to the state or the conflict with the state being the primary agent in the production of the city. The third component of the research aims to understand how informality is being produced, and why the same actors oscillate between formal and informal practices. In this regard, a study of water supply management and solid waste management in and around the slum settlement of Jagdamba Camp is taken as a case study. This part of the thesis theorizes informality as a practice using Bourdieu and demonstrates through the case study that the production of informality is a highly varied and nuanced process. It takes the urban infrastructure as a medium to understand social and political aspects of the society. The results argue that informality as a practice is not completely dependent on the habitus of the actors, but on the rules of the field in which these actors operate. This opens the analytical possibility to understand how and why the same actors practice both formality and informality in different fields. The three components are the core chapters of this thesis-by-article. They come together in understanding the urbanization process via informality rather than using formal urbanization to understand informality. The first part outlines the larger historical development of informality resulting in various state legislations. The following two components outline how the people cope, adapt, and influence these legislations resulting in a distinct urbanization process. The overall results are framed using perspectives from southern theory and show how informal practices are universal, but these practices get differentially connoted and acted upon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信