圣战的二元论

K. Patterson
{"title":"圣战的二元论","authors":"K. Patterson","doi":"10.1075/jlac.00075.pat","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores how metaphors are employed in jihadist magazines to promote a dichotomist worldview of ‘us’\n versus ‘them’, ‘good’ versus ‘bad’, ‘east’ versus ‘west’ and ‘right’ versus ‘wrong’. It argues that juxtapositions in both\n language and thought help writers to reaffirm and/or challenge certain paradigms. The approach uses critical metaphor analysis\n (Charteris-Black 2004) to investigate qualitative evidence of conceptual metaphors,\n focusing on the domains life is a seed, conflict is a relationship between predator and prey, and faith is light/lack\n of faith is darkness. Dichotomous language in these domains (e.g., ‘seed’ versus ‘weed’; ‘sheep’ versus ‘wolves’; the\n ‘spark of Jihad’ versus the ‘shadow’ of Western governments) helps to position extremist groups on the right side of a number of\n paradigms. The use of binary metaphors also permits simultaneously conflicting conceptualisations; for instance, jihadists are\n both innocent victims and merciless defenders of their faith, depending on with whom or what they are juxtaposed. The research\n concludes that the use of binary metaphors serves to underscore entrenched paradigms of ‘good’ versus ‘bad’, thus allowing the\n writers to frame their discourse in a way that justifies and promotes their extremist agenda.","PeriodicalId":324436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dualisms in Jihad\",\"authors\":\"K. Patterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jlac.00075.pat\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper explores how metaphors are employed in jihadist magazines to promote a dichotomist worldview of ‘us’\\n versus ‘them’, ‘good’ versus ‘bad’, ‘east’ versus ‘west’ and ‘right’ versus ‘wrong’. It argues that juxtapositions in both\\n language and thought help writers to reaffirm and/or challenge certain paradigms. The approach uses critical metaphor analysis\\n (Charteris-Black 2004) to investigate qualitative evidence of conceptual metaphors,\\n focusing on the domains life is a seed, conflict is a relationship between predator and prey, and faith is light/lack\\n of faith is darkness. Dichotomous language in these domains (e.g., ‘seed’ versus ‘weed’; ‘sheep’ versus ‘wolves’; the\\n ‘spark of Jihad’ versus the ‘shadow’ of Western governments) helps to position extremist groups on the right side of a number of\\n paradigms. The use of binary metaphors also permits simultaneously conflicting conceptualisations; for instance, jihadists are\\n both innocent victims and merciless defenders of their faith, depending on with whom or what they are juxtaposed. The research\\n concludes that the use of binary metaphors serves to underscore entrenched paradigms of ‘good’ versus ‘bad’, thus allowing the\\n writers to frame their discourse in a way that justifies and promotes their extremist agenda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00075.pat\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00075.pat","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文探讨了圣战杂志如何使用隐喻来宣传“我们”与“他们”、“好”与“坏”、“东”与“西”、“对”与“错”的二分主义世界观。它认为,语言和思想的并置有助于作者重申和/或挑战某些范式。该方法使用批判性隐喻分析(Charteris-Black 2004)来调查概念隐喻的定性证据,重点关注生命是种子、冲突是捕食者和猎物之间的关系、信仰是光明/缺乏信仰是黑暗等领域。这些领域中的二分语言(例如,“种子”与“杂草”;“羊”和“狼”;(“圣战的火花”与西方政府的“影子”)有助于将极端主义组织定位在许多范式的正确一边。二元隐喻的使用也允许同时冲突的概念化;例如,圣战分子既是无辜的受害者,也是他们信仰的无情捍卫者,这取决于他们与谁或什么并列。研究得出结论,二元隐喻的使用有助于强调“好”与“坏”的根深蒂固的范式,从而使作者能够以一种合理化和促进其极端主义议程的方式构建他们的话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dualisms in Jihad
This paper explores how metaphors are employed in jihadist magazines to promote a dichotomist worldview of ‘us’ versus ‘them’, ‘good’ versus ‘bad’, ‘east’ versus ‘west’ and ‘right’ versus ‘wrong’. It argues that juxtapositions in both language and thought help writers to reaffirm and/or challenge certain paradigms. The approach uses critical metaphor analysis (Charteris-Black 2004) to investigate qualitative evidence of conceptual metaphors, focusing on the domains life is a seed, conflict is a relationship between predator and prey, and faith is light/lack of faith is darkness. Dichotomous language in these domains (e.g., ‘seed’ versus ‘weed’; ‘sheep’ versus ‘wolves’; the ‘spark of Jihad’ versus the ‘shadow’ of Western governments) helps to position extremist groups on the right side of a number of paradigms. The use of binary metaphors also permits simultaneously conflicting conceptualisations; for instance, jihadists are both innocent victims and merciless defenders of their faith, depending on with whom or what they are juxtaposed. The research concludes that the use of binary metaphors serves to underscore entrenched paradigms of ‘good’ versus ‘bad’, thus allowing the writers to frame their discourse in a way that justifies and promotes their extremist agenda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信