波普尔哲学中的客观性概念

S. Ovchinnikov
{"title":"波普尔哲学中的客观性概念","authors":"S. Ovchinnikov","doi":"10.47850/S.2020.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work examines two main interpretations of the objectivity of knowledge in the philosophy of K. Popper. The first includes an assessment of the properties of theories, namely, belief in their meaningfulness and/or truth. The second refers to the role of the subject and the scientific community in the process of cognition, with the subject viewed as asource of errors and the community as a source of objectivity. Criticism of the postpositivist direction of the philosophy of science shows the inconsistency of such an approach, therefore, this work proposes an under-standing of the objectivity of knowledge through an appeal to the mechanisms of the subject's perception.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE CONCEPT OF OBJECTIVITY IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF K.POPPER\",\"authors\":\"S. Ovchinnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.47850/S.2020.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The work examines two main interpretations of the objectivity of knowledge in the philosophy of K. Popper. The first includes an assessment of the properties of theories, namely, belief in their meaningfulness and/or truth. The second refers to the role of the subject and the scientific community in the process of cognition, with the subject viewed as asource of errors and the community as a source of objectivity. Criticism of the postpositivist direction of the philosophy of science shows the inconsistency of such an approach, therefore, this work proposes an under-standing of the objectivity of knowledge through an appeal to the mechanisms of the subject's perception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了波普哲学中关于知识客观性的两种主要解释。第一种包括对理论属性的评估,即对其意义和/或真理的信念。二是主体和科学共同体在认知过程中的作用,主体被视为错误的来源,科学共同体被视为客观的来源。对科学哲学的后实证主义方向的批评表明了这种方法的不一致性,因此,这项工作提出了对知识客观性的理解,通过对主体感知机制的呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE CONCEPT OF OBJECTIVITY IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF K.POPPER
The work examines two main interpretations of the objectivity of knowledge in the philosophy of K. Popper. The first includes an assessment of the properties of theories, namely, belief in their meaningfulness and/or truth. The second refers to the role of the subject and the scientific community in the process of cognition, with the subject viewed as asource of errors and the community as a source of objectivity. Criticism of the postpositivist direction of the philosophy of science shows the inconsistency of such an approach, therefore, this work proposes an under-standing of the objectivity of knowledge through an appeal to the mechanisms of the subject's perception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信