{"title":"农村环境:城市规划和政治行动中可及性和可负担性的悖论","authors":"A. Popoola","doi":"10.54030/2788-564x/2022/cp1v2a11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The argument that rural areas or rurality will disappear in the face of undoubted urbanisation remains vague and inconclusive. However, the infrastructure poverty and poor service delivery that characterise rural spaces are evident. Using data from interview and focus group discussion (FGD) collected from sampled rural communities in Oyo State Nigeria, this study asks the question if there is no confusion or rather a paradox in what planning and politics ought to be in rural areas. The study concludes that planning and politics in the sampled community driving at opposite direction of public rural infrastructure and service good. The recommendation was for planning to be more rural oriented and the urban bias (as it relates to planning standards) corrected. The need for a more inclusive and responsive rural governance towards achieving inclusion that will promoted national rather than urban development was emphasised.","PeriodicalId":444854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inclusive Cities and Built Environment","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RURAL SETTING: THE PARADOX OF ITS ACCESSIBILITY AND AFFORDABILITY IN THE URBAN PLANNING AND POLITICAL ACTIONING\",\"authors\":\"A. Popoola\",\"doi\":\"10.54030/2788-564x/2022/cp1v2a11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The argument that rural areas or rurality will disappear in the face of undoubted urbanisation remains vague and inconclusive. However, the infrastructure poverty and poor service delivery that characterise rural spaces are evident. Using data from interview and focus group discussion (FGD) collected from sampled rural communities in Oyo State Nigeria, this study asks the question if there is no confusion or rather a paradox in what planning and politics ought to be in rural areas. The study concludes that planning and politics in the sampled community driving at opposite direction of public rural infrastructure and service good. The recommendation was for planning to be more rural oriented and the urban bias (as it relates to planning standards) corrected. The need for a more inclusive and responsive rural governance towards achieving inclusion that will promoted national rather than urban development was emphasised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Inclusive Cities and Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Inclusive Cities and Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54030/2788-564x/2022/cp1v2a11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inclusive Cities and Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54030/2788-564x/2022/cp1v2a11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
RURAL SETTING: THE PARADOX OF ITS ACCESSIBILITY AND AFFORDABILITY IN THE URBAN PLANNING AND POLITICAL ACTIONING
The argument that rural areas or rurality will disappear in the face of undoubted urbanisation remains vague and inconclusive. However, the infrastructure poverty and poor service delivery that characterise rural spaces are evident. Using data from interview and focus group discussion (FGD) collected from sampled rural communities in Oyo State Nigeria, this study asks the question if there is no confusion or rather a paradox in what planning and politics ought to be in rural areas. The study concludes that planning and politics in the sampled community driving at opposite direction of public rural infrastructure and service good. The recommendation was for planning to be more rural oriented and the urban bias (as it relates to planning standards) corrected. The need for a more inclusive and responsive rural governance towards achieving inclusion that will promoted national rather than urban development was emphasised.