间接税与政府不平等减少:发达国家的跨国分析

V. Mahler, David K. Jesuit
{"title":"间接税与政府不平等减少:发达国家的跨国分析","authors":"V. Mahler, David K. Jesuit","doi":"10.25071/1874-6322.40339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the role of indirect taxes in helping to finance public social transfers in the developed countries, with special attention to the seeming paradox whereby countries whose social benefit programs provide the most inequality reduction tend to finance those programs with the most regressive tax mix. It finds that the share of indirect taxes in a country’s GDP and the degree to which market inequality is reduced by public social transfers are positively related, even controlling for other tax types, the share of the population that is elderly and the unemployment rate; that a large indirect tax burden is politically possible because of some combination of fiscal illusion and the fact that indirect taxes do not retard economic growth or investment; and that the high indirect taxes that finance public social transfers are often the product of a political process in which democratic corporatism, institutional structures and union density play key roles. The article concludes with a discussion of the incidence of indirect taxes, finding that their regressive effect is outweighed by the redistribution accomplished by the public social transfers they help to finance.","PeriodicalId":142300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Income Distribution®","volume":"42 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indirect taxes and government inequality reduction: A cross-national analysis of the developed world\",\"authors\":\"V. Mahler, David K. Jesuit\",\"doi\":\"10.25071/1874-6322.40339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the role of indirect taxes in helping to finance public social transfers in the developed countries, with special attention to the seeming paradox whereby countries whose social benefit programs provide the most inequality reduction tend to finance those programs with the most regressive tax mix. It finds that the share of indirect taxes in a country’s GDP and the degree to which market inequality is reduced by public social transfers are positively related, even controlling for other tax types, the share of the population that is elderly and the unemployment rate; that a large indirect tax burden is politically possible because of some combination of fiscal illusion and the fact that indirect taxes do not retard economic growth or investment; and that the high indirect taxes that finance public social transfers are often the product of a political process in which democratic corporatism, institutional structures and union density play key roles. The article concludes with a discussion of the incidence of indirect taxes, finding that their regressive effect is outweighed by the redistribution accomplished by the public social transfers they help to finance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Income Distribution®\",\"volume\":\"42 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Income Distribution®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Income Distribution®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文探讨了间接税在帮助发达国家为公共社会转移支付提供资金方面的作用,并特别关注了一个看似矛盾的现象,即那些社会福利项目提供的不平等减少最多的国家,往往会用最累退的税收组合为这些项目提供资金。研究发现,间接税在一个国家GDP中的份额与公共社会转移减少市场不平等的程度呈正相关,即使控制了其他税收类型、老年人口比例和失业率;巨大的间接税负担在政治上是可能的,因为财政错觉和间接税不会阻碍经济增长或投资的事实在某种程度上结合在一起;为公共社会转移提供资金的高额间接税往往是一个政治过程的产物,在这个过程中,民主社团主义、制度结构和工会密度发挥了关键作用。文章最后讨论了间接税的发生率,发现间接税的倒退效应被它们帮助资助的公共社会转移所完成的再分配所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indirect taxes and government inequality reduction: A cross-national analysis of the developed world
This article explores the role of indirect taxes in helping to finance public social transfers in the developed countries, with special attention to the seeming paradox whereby countries whose social benefit programs provide the most inequality reduction tend to finance those programs with the most regressive tax mix. It finds that the share of indirect taxes in a country’s GDP and the degree to which market inequality is reduced by public social transfers are positively related, even controlling for other tax types, the share of the population that is elderly and the unemployment rate; that a large indirect tax burden is politically possible because of some combination of fiscal illusion and the fact that indirect taxes do not retard economic growth or investment; and that the high indirect taxes that finance public social transfers are often the product of a political process in which democratic corporatism, institutional structures and union density play key roles. The article concludes with a discussion of the incidence of indirect taxes, finding that their regressive effect is outweighed by the redistribution accomplished by the public social transfers they help to finance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信