改进广义拜占庭协议问题的新方法

Hsieh Hui-Ching, Chiang Mao-Lun
{"title":"改进广义拜占庭协议问题的新方法","authors":"Hsieh Hui-Ching, Chiang Mao-Lun","doi":"10.7763/IJCTE.2015.V7.942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To achieve reliability, it is very important to study the agreement and fault-tolerance topic in distributed systems. This kind of problem is known as a Byzantine Agreement (BA) problem. It requires a set of processors to agree on a common value, even if some processors and transmission media are faulty. Basically, the traditional BA protocols require (n-1)/3 + 2 rounds of message exchange to make each processor reach an agreement. In other words, those protocols are inefficient and unreasonable, due to the number of message results in a large protocol overhead. In this study, we propose a novel and efficient protocol to reduce the amount of messages. Our protocol can compare and replace the messages received from other processors to find out the reliable processors and replace the value sent by the un-reliable processors through four rounds of message exchange even when the total number of faulty components or the total number of processors in the system is large. Finally, the agreement can be reached by using the minimum number of messages in the distributed system, while tolerating the maximum number of faulty components.","PeriodicalId":306280,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Approach to Improve the Generalized Byzantine Agreement Problem\",\"authors\":\"Hsieh Hui-Ching, Chiang Mao-Lun\",\"doi\":\"10.7763/IJCTE.2015.V7.942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To achieve reliability, it is very important to study the agreement and fault-tolerance topic in distributed systems. This kind of problem is known as a Byzantine Agreement (BA) problem. It requires a set of processors to agree on a common value, even if some processors and transmission media are faulty. Basically, the traditional BA protocols require (n-1)/3 + 2 rounds of message exchange to make each processor reach an agreement. In other words, those protocols are inefficient and unreasonable, due to the number of message results in a large protocol overhead. In this study, we propose a novel and efficient protocol to reduce the amount of messages. Our protocol can compare and replace the messages received from other processors to find out the reliable processors and replace the value sent by the un-reliable processors through four rounds of message exchange even when the total number of faulty components or the total number of processors in the system is large. Finally, the agreement can be reached by using the minimum number of messages in the distributed system, while tolerating the maximum number of faulty components.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7763/IJCTE.2015.V7.942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7763/IJCTE.2015.V7.942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

为了实现分布式系统的可靠性,研究分布式系统的一致性和容错问题是非常重要的。这种问题被称为拜占庭协议(BA)问题。它要求一组处理器就一个共同的值达成一致,即使某些处理器和传输介质出现故障。基本上,传统的BA协议需要(n-1)/3+ 2轮消息交换才能使每个处理器达成协议。换句话说,这些协议是低效和不合理的,因为消息的数量导致了很大的协议开销。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种新颖有效的协议来减少消息量。我们的协议可以比较和替换从其他处理器接收到的消息,找出可靠的处理器,并通过四轮消息交换替换不可靠处理器发送的值,即使系统中故障组件总数或处理器总数很大。最后,通过在分布式系统中使用最小数量的消息,同时容忍最大数量的故障组件,可以达成协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Approach to Improve the Generalized Byzantine Agreement Problem
To achieve reliability, it is very important to study the agreement and fault-tolerance topic in distributed systems. This kind of problem is known as a Byzantine Agreement (BA) problem. It requires a set of processors to agree on a common value, even if some processors and transmission media are faulty. Basically, the traditional BA protocols require (n-1)/3 + 2 rounds of message exchange to make each processor reach an agreement. In other words, those protocols are inefficient and unreasonable, due to the number of message results in a large protocol overhead. In this study, we propose a novel and efficient protocol to reduce the amount of messages. Our protocol can compare and replace the messages received from other processors to find out the reliable processors and replace the value sent by the un-reliable processors through four rounds of message exchange even when the total number of faulty components or the total number of processors in the system is large. Finally, the agreement can be reached by using the minimum number of messages in the distributed system, while tolerating the maximum number of faulty components.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信