几种数字签名批量验证方法的性能分析

D. Guan, E. Zhuang, I. C. Chung, Yu-Shen Lin
{"title":"几种数字签名批量验证方法的性能分析","authors":"D. Guan, E. Zhuang, I. C. Chung, Yu-Shen Lin","doi":"10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare three methods in detecting invalid signatures in batch verification. The first method, randomly select test, randomly chooses a half of signatures to verify in a batch. The second method is the small exponent test which is widely used. The third method, randomly numbering test, is a simplified method of the matrix-detection algorithm. The randomly numbering test randomizes the order of the signatures and verifies the signatures in log k+1 batches where k is the number of signatures. We simulate each method and analyze the efficiency of the methods. As a result, randomly numbering test is more efficient than small exponent test when the number of signatures in a batch verification is large.","PeriodicalId":108636,"journal":{"name":"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis of Some Batch Verification Methods of Digital Signatures\",\"authors\":\"D. Guan, E. Zhuang, I. C. Chung, Yu-Shen Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we compare three methods in detecting invalid signatures in batch verification. The first method, randomly select test, randomly chooses a half of signatures to verify in a batch. The second method is the small exponent test which is widely used. The third method, randomly numbering test, is a simplified method of the matrix-detection algorithm. The randomly numbering test randomizes the order of the signatures and verifies the signatures in log k+1 batches where k is the number of signatures. We simulate each method and analyze the efficiency of the methods. As a result, randomly numbering test is more efficient than small exponent test when the number of signatures in a batch verification is large.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文比较了批验证中检测无效签名的三种方法。第一种方法是随机选择测试,随机选择一半的签名进行批量验证。第二种方法是广泛使用的小指数检验。第三种方法是随机编号检验,它是矩阵检测算法的一种简化方法。随机编号测试将签名的顺序随机化,以log k+1批(k为签名个数)为周期进行验证。对每种方法进行了仿真,并对其有效性进行了分析。因此,当批量验证的签名数较大时,随机编号测试比小指数测试效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Analysis of Some Batch Verification Methods of Digital Signatures
In this paper, we compare three methods in detecting invalid signatures in batch verification. The first method, randomly select test, randomly chooses a half of signatures to verify in a batch. The second method is the small exponent test which is widely used. The third method, randomly numbering test, is a simplified method of the matrix-detection algorithm. The randomly numbering test randomizes the order of the signatures and verifies the signatures in log k+1 batches where k is the number of signatures. We simulate each method and analyze the efficiency of the methods. As a result, randomly numbering test is more efficient than small exponent test when the number of signatures in a batch verification is large.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信