牙根吸收与两种不同的犬侧缩机制的临床研究

A. Abouelnour, M. Tawfik, Ahmed Bastawy, Ashraf Elbedwehi
{"title":"牙根吸收与两种不同的犬侧缩机制的临床研究","authors":"A. Abouelnour, M. Tawfik, Ahmed Bastawy, Ashraf Elbedwehi","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2022.234800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Acceleration of orthodontic treatment and achieving the desired results is essential for the patients and orthodontist, which increases the importance of finding the best method to accelerate tooth movement. it seems important to compare the rate of root resorption when canine retraction is performed by two different mechanics assuming that there will be less root resorption with lingual retraction mechanics.. Subjects and Methods: This is a prospective randomized clinical study that was conducted on a total sample of 26 orthodontic patients recommended for upper first premolar extraction as part of their orthodontic treatment plan. The patient ages were ranged from (16-26) years. Group I: Thirteen orthodontic patients were treated with Roth brackets 0.022-inch slot for a labial orthodontic appliance with palatal retraction force. Group II: Thirteen orthodontic patients were treated with Roth brackets 0.022-inch slot for a labial orthodontic appliance with labial retraction force.. Results: There is statistically non-significant difference in canine length and canine root resorption between the two studied groups.. Conclusion: Both methods of retraction with labial or palatal force could be effective in canine retraction.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Root Resorption Concomitant with Two Different Canine Retraction Mechanics (A Prospective Clinical Study)\",\"authors\":\"A. Abouelnour, M. Tawfik, Ahmed Bastawy, Ashraf Elbedwehi\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/aadj.2022.234800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Acceleration of orthodontic treatment and achieving the desired results is essential for the patients and orthodontist, which increases the importance of finding the best method to accelerate tooth movement. it seems important to compare the rate of root resorption when canine retraction is performed by two different mechanics assuming that there will be less root resorption with lingual retraction mechanics.. Subjects and Methods: This is a prospective randomized clinical study that was conducted on a total sample of 26 orthodontic patients recommended for upper first premolar extraction as part of their orthodontic treatment plan. The patient ages were ranged from (16-26) years. Group I: Thirteen orthodontic patients were treated with Roth brackets 0.022-inch slot for a labial orthodontic appliance with palatal retraction force. Group II: Thirteen orthodontic patients were treated with Roth brackets 0.022-inch slot for a labial orthodontic appliance with labial retraction force.. Results: There is statistically non-significant difference in canine length and canine root resorption between the two studied groups.. Conclusion: Both methods of retraction with labial or palatal force could be effective in canine retraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2022.234800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2022.234800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:加快正畸治疗并达到预期效果对患者和正畸医师都是至关重要的,这就增加了寻找最佳方法来加速牙齿移动的重要性。当采用两种不同的力学方法进行犬侧牵拔时,假设采用舌侧牵拔会有较少的根吸收,比较根吸收率似乎很重要。对象和方法:这是一项前瞻性随机临床研究,对26名正畸患者进行了随机抽样研究,推荐将第一前磨牙拔牙作为正畸治疗计划的一部分。患者年龄16-26岁。第一组:13例正畸患者采用0.022英寸槽Roth托槽,使用腭内收力的唇部正畸矫治器。第二组:13例正畸患者采用0.022英寸槽口Roth托槽作为唇形矫治器,具有唇内收力。结果:两组患者犬齿长度及牙根吸收差异无统计学意义。结论:唇部力和腭部力均可有效地治疗犬的牵张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Root Resorption Concomitant with Two Different Canine Retraction Mechanics (A Prospective Clinical Study)
Aim: Acceleration of orthodontic treatment and achieving the desired results is essential for the patients and orthodontist, which increases the importance of finding the best method to accelerate tooth movement. it seems important to compare the rate of root resorption when canine retraction is performed by two different mechanics assuming that there will be less root resorption with lingual retraction mechanics.. Subjects and Methods: This is a prospective randomized clinical study that was conducted on a total sample of 26 orthodontic patients recommended for upper first premolar extraction as part of their orthodontic treatment plan. The patient ages were ranged from (16-26) years. Group I: Thirteen orthodontic patients were treated with Roth brackets 0.022-inch slot for a labial orthodontic appliance with palatal retraction force. Group II: Thirteen orthodontic patients were treated with Roth brackets 0.022-inch slot for a labial orthodontic appliance with labial retraction force.. Results: There is statistically non-significant difference in canine length and canine root resorption between the two studied groups.. Conclusion: Both methods of retraction with labial or palatal force could be effective in canine retraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信