托马斯·托伦斯对卡尔·巴特基督论对自然神学的拒绝的重新表述

J. D. Morrison
{"title":"托马斯·托伦斯对卡尔·巴特基督论对自然神学的拒绝的重新表述","authors":"J. D. Morrison","doi":"10.1163/27725472-07301006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Karl Barth is widely noted for his antipathy to all forms of natural theology. Indeed, the results of Barth’s Christocentricity have made his name synonymous with the negation of all divine revelation apart from Christ, the one Word of God. If this is so, then the theology of Thomas Torrance, as a highly significant development of Barth's thought and as vitally concerned with proper natural theology (in dialogue with the physical sciences), becomes a questionable enterprise. This article examines this question and concludes that, while Torrance clearly goes beyond Barth, he is faithful to subthemes in Barth's theology relating to ‘natural theology’, making explicit and bringing to prominence streams of Barthian thought often left unnoticed.","PeriodicalId":134774,"journal":{"name":"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thomas Torrance’s Reformulation of Karl Barth’s Christological Rejection of Natural Theology\",\"authors\":\"J. D. Morrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/27725472-07301006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Karl Barth is widely noted for his antipathy to all forms of natural theology. Indeed, the results of Barth’s Christocentricity have made his name synonymous with the negation of all divine revelation apart from Christ, the one Word of God. If this is so, then the theology of Thomas Torrance, as a highly significant development of Barth's thought and as vitally concerned with proper natural theology (in dialogue with the physical sciences), becomes a questionable enterprise. This article examines this question and concludes that, while Torrance clearly goes beyond Barth, he is faithful to subthemes in Barth's theology relating to ‘natural theology’, making explicit and bringing to prominence streams of Barthian thought often left unnoticed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-07301006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-07301006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

卡尔·巴特因其对所有形式的自然神学的反感而广为人知。事实上,巴特的基督中心主义的结果使他的名字成为除了基督之外的所有神圣启示的否定的同义词,上帝的唯一话语。如果是这样的话,那么托马斯·托伦斯的神学,作为巴特思想的一个高度重要的发展,作为与适当的自然神学(在与物理科学的对话中)密切相关的,就变成了一个值得怀疑的事业。本文研究了这个问题,并得出结论,虽然托伦斯显然超越了巴特,但他忠实于巴特神学中与“自然神学”相关的次要主题,明确并突出了经常被忽视的巴特思想流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thomas Torrance’s Reformulation of Karl Barth’s Christological Rejection of Natural Theology
Karl Barth is widely noted for his antipathy to all forms of natural theology. Indeed, the results of Barth’s Christocentricity have made his name synonymous with the negation of all divine revelation apart from Christ, the one Word of God. If this is so, then the theology of Thomas Torrance, as a highly significant development of Barth's thought and as vitally concerned with proper natural theology (in dialogue with the physical sciences), becomes a questionable enterprise. This article examines this question and concludes that, while Torrance clearly goes beyond Barth, he is faithful to subthemes in Barth's theology relating to ‘natural theology’, making explicit and bringing to prominence streams of Barthian thought often left unnoticed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信