数据驱动经济下的产业政策反思

Dan Ciuriak
{"title":"数据驱动经济下的产业政策反思","authors":"Dan Ciuriak","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3223072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note reviews industrial policy in theory and historical practice and makes the case for a fundamental reframing based on the centrality of data to the data-driven digital economy, the various roles that data plays in this economy (as medium of digital transactions, as intangible capital, and as infrastructure of a digitized economy), and the heightened scope for market failure in the data-driven economy. It suggests the following five principles to guide the formation of industrial/innovation policy in the knowledge-based and data-driven digital economy: \n1) Participation in the data-driven economy requires access to truly big data. Small open economies will need to scale up data in order to scale up companies. \n2) The acceleration of the pace of change and the concentration of wealth in the data-driven economy changes the set of investments with risk-return metrics that the private sector will engage. Public policy must support projects that have social merit but which private capital leaves on the table, and which would be screened out by conventional criteria for industrial policy interventions by the public sector. \n3) Foreign direct investment policy must take into account the impact of inward M&A investment on the dynamism of innovation systems, in particular where such takeovers would have anti-competitive effects or materially reduce knowledge spillover benefits within a country’s innovation system. \n4) The rent-based business model of the data-driven economy makes asset accumulation essential for national wealth creation. \nPolicy must therefore shift from focussing on activity to building a rent-generating stock of technology assets, including by: \n(a) adopting a retention policy for domestically-developed knowledge capital developed with public funding support; \n(b) giving appropriate weight to the implications for a country’s stock of technology assets of FDI, including the potential loss of technology through inward MA and \n(c) ensuring freedom to operate for domestic technology firms through, for example, a state patent fund to address issues related to patent proliferation. \n(5) International commitments need to preserve policy space to implement a data strategy to secure a foothold in this emerging economy. \nAs part of their data strategies, countries should assess the market value of data generated in the exercise of public sector governance; put in place procedures to capture it; and use procurement to develop new capabilities in the private sector.","PeriodicalId":424970,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal","volume":"145 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Industrial Policy for the Data-Driven Economy\",\"authors\":\"Dan Ciuriak\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3223072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note reviews industrial policy in theory and historical practice and makes the case for a fundamental reframing based on the centrality of data to the data-driven digital economy, the various roles that data plays in this economy (as medium of digital transactions, as intangible capital, and as infrastructure of a digitized economy), and the heightened scope for market failure in the data-driven economy. It suggests the following five principles to guide the formation of industrial/innovation policy in the knowledge-based and data-driven digital economy: \\n1) Participation in the data-driven economy requires access to truly big data. Small open economies will need to scale up data in order to scale up companies. \\n2) The acceleration of the pace of change and the concentration of wealth in the data-driven economy changes the set of investments with risk-return metrics that the private sector will engage. Public policy must support projects that have social merit but which private capital leaves on the table, and which would be screened out by conventional criteria for industrial policy interventions by the public sector. \\n3) Foreign direct investment policy must take into account the impact of inward M&A investment on the dynamism of innovation systems, in particular where such takeovers would have anti-competitive effects or materially reduce knowledge spillover benefits within a country’s innovation system. \\n4) The rent-based business model of the data-driven economy makes asset accumulation essential for national wealth creation. \\nPolicy must therefore shift from focussing on activity to building a rent-generating stock of technology assets, including by: \\n(a) adopting a retention policy for domestically-developed knowledge capital developed with public funding support; \\n(b) giving appropriate weight to the implications for a country’s stock of technology assets of FDI, including the potential loss of technology through inward MA and \\n(c) ensuring freedom to operate for domestic technology firms through, for example, a state patent fund to address issues related to patent proliferation. \\n(5) International commitments need to preserve policy space to implement a data strategy to secure a foothold in this emerging economy. \\nAs part of their data strategies, countries should assess the market value of data generated in the exercise of public sector governance; put in place procedures to capture it; and use procurement to develop new capabilities in the private sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"145 12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3223072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3223072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文回顾了理论和历史实践中的产业政策,并基于数据在数据驱动的数字经济中的中心地位、数据在这一经济中扮演的各种角色(作为数字交易的媒介、无形资本和数字化经济的基础设施)以及数据驱动经济中市场失灵的扩大范围,提出了基本重构的理由。报告提出,在知识驱动和数据驱动的数字经济中,产业创新政策的形成应遵循以下五大原则:1)参与数据驱动经济需要获得真正意义上的大数据。小型开放经济体将需要扩大数据规模,以扩大公司规模。2)变革步伐的加快和财富在数据驱动型经济中的集中,改变了私营部门将参与的具有风险回报指标的投资组合。公共政策必须支持那些具有社会价值但被私人资本搁置一旁的项目,这些项目将被公共部门工业政策干预的传统标准淘汰。3)外国直接投资政策必须考虑到外来并购投资对创新系统活力的影响,特别是在此类收购可能产生反竞争效应或实质性降低一国创新系统内知识溢出效益的情况下。4)数据驱动经济的租金型商业模式使得资产积累成为国民财富创造的必要条件。因此,政策必须从侧重于活动转向建立可产生租金的技术资产存量,包括:(a)对在公共资金支持下开发的国内开发的知识资本采取保留政策;(b)适当重视外国直接投资对一国技术资产存量的影响,包括通过外来并购可能造成的技术损失;(c)确保国内技术公司的经营自由,例如通过设立国家专利基金来解决与专利扩散有关的问题。(5)国际承诺需要保留政策空间,以实施数据战略,以确保在这个新兴经济体中站稳脚跟。作为其数据战略的一部分,各国应评估在公共部门治理中产生的数据的市场价值;制定程序来捕获它;并利用采购来发展私营部门的新能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking Industrial Policy for the Data-Driven Economy
This note reviews industrial policy in theory and historical practice and makes the case for a fundamental reframing based on the centrality of data to the data-driven digital economy, the various roles that data plays in this economy (as medium of digital transactions, as intangible capital, and as infrastructure of a digitized economy), and the heightened scope for market failure in the data-driven economy. It suggests the following five principles to guide the formation of industrial/innovation policy in the knowledge-based and data-driven digital economy: 1) Participation in the data-driven economy requires access to truly big data. Small open economies will need to scale up data in order to scale up companies. 2) The acceleration of the pace of change and the concentration of wealth in the data-driven economy changes the set of investments with risk-return metrics that the private sector will engage. Public policy must support projects that have social merit but which private capital leaves on the table, and which would be screened out by conventional criteria for industrial policy interventions by the public sector. 3) Foreign direct investment policy must take into account the impact of inward M&A investment on the dynamism of innovation systems, in particular where such takeovers would have anti-competitive effects or materially reduce knowledge spillover benefits within a country’s innovation system. 4) The rent-based business model of the data-driven economy makes asset accumulation essential for national wealth creation. Policy must therefore shift from focussing on activity to building a rent-generating stock of technology assets, including by: (a) adopting a retention policy for domestically-developed knowledge capital developed with public funding support; (b) giving appropriate weight to the implications for a country’s stock of technology assets of FDI, including the potential loss of technology through inward MA and (c) ensuring freedom to operate for domestic technology firms through, for example, a state patent fund to address issues related to patent proliferation. (5) International commitments need to preserve policy space to implement a data strategy to secure a foothold in this emerging economy. As part of their data strategies, countries should assess the market value of data generated in the exercise of public sector governance; put in place procedures to capture it; and use procurement to develop new capabilities in the private sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信