临床数据解释的关键-理解潜在病理生理学和临床实践中有效利用病理生理学信息的途径

C. Yamada, Yumi Masuda, Chiori Takamatsu, N. Kishimoto, Nana Urata, Kengo Moriyama, S. Takashimizu, A. Kubo, Y. Nishizaki
{"title":"临床数据解释的关键-理解潜在病理生理学和临床实践中有效利用病理生理学信息的途径","authors":"C. Yamada, Yumi Masuda, Chiori Takamatsu, N. Kishimoto, Nana Urata, Kengo Moriyama, S. Takashimizu, A. Kubo, Y. Nishizaki","doi":"10.7143/jhep.47.585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health screening/Ningen Dock loses much of its value if the examinees simply undergo health-checks without reflecting on the results (for healthcare providers, if they simply provide health examinations without paying attention to the results). Routine examinations, not necessarily expensive ones, can provide a great deal of information that—depending on how the data is interpreted—can be meaningful to living a long healthy life. From acute to chronic diseases, including lifestyle-related diseases, front-line health care personnel require specific approaches to understanding the underlying pathophysiology and effectively utilizing this pathophysiological information in their clinical practice. Reference intervals are, in general, defined as intervals between the 2.5 th and 97.5 th percentiles of the reference distribution. When a clinical value is within the reference interval, the result is usually rated as “A”. From a rating alone, an examinee may be moved from joy to sorrow, or a healthcare provider may consider an individual to be disease-free. It is important to closely observe the changes across ages when we interpret laboratory data. Regardless of the rating, healthcare providers must pay attention to the transitional change from the previous results. It is necessary to evaluate whether the value is reaching to the reference limit or whether it is rapidly worsening. In addition, we should be careful not to cling onto just one parameter. Disease risks are often evaluated using multiple factors, and we should not consider the results to reflect a disease-free status just because a parameter is within the reference interval. With advancing age, the parameters associated with lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hyperuricemia tend to be rated as “needing close observation” or “needing re-evaluation”. On the","PeriodicalId":150891,"journal":{"name":"Health Evaluation and Promotion","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keys to the Interpretation of Clinical Data —Approaches to Understanding Underlying Pathophysiology and Effective Utilization of Pathophysiological Information in Clinical Practice—\",\"authors\":\"C. Yamada, Yumi Masuda, Chiori Takamatsu, N. Kishimoto, Nana Urata, Kengo Moriyama, S. Takashimizu, A. Kubo, Y. Nishizaki\",\"doi\":\"10.7143/jhep.47.585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Health screening/Ningen Dock loses much of its value if the examinees simply undergo health-checks without reflecting on the results (for healthcare providers, if they simply provide health examinations without paying attention to the results). Routine examinations, not necessarily expensive ones, can provide a great deal of information that—depending on how the data is interpreted—can be meaningful to living a long healthy life. From acute to chronic diseases, including lifestyle-related diseases, front-line health care personnel require specific approaches to understanding the underlying pathophysiology and effectively utilizing this pathophysiological information in their clinical practice. Reference intervals are, in general, defined as intervals between the 2.5 th and 97.5 th percentiles of the reference distribution. When a clinical value is within the reference interval, the result is usually rated as “A”. From a rating alone, an examinee may be moved from joy to sorrow, or a healthcare provider may consider an individual to be disease-free. It is important to closely observe the changes across ages when we interpret laboratory data. Regardless of the rating, healthcare providers must pay attention to the transitional change from the previous results. It is necessary to evaluate whether the value is reaching to the reference limit or whether it is rapidly worsening. In addition, we should be careful not to cling onto just one parameter. Disease risks are often evaluated using multiple factors, and we should not consider the results to reflect a disease-free status just because a parameter is within the reference interval. With advancing age, the parameters associated with lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hyperuricemia tend to be rated as “needing close observation” or “needing re-evaluation”. On the\",\"PeriodicalId\":150891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Evaluation and Promotion\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Evaluation and Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7143/jhep.47.585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Evaluation and Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7143/jhep.47.585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果考生只是接受健康检查而不考虑结果(对于医疗保健提供者来说,如果他们只是提供健康检查而不关注结果),那么健康检查/宁根码头就失去了很大的价值。常规检查,不一定是昂贵的检查,可以提供大量的信息,这取决于如何解释数据,可能对健康长寿有意义。从急性疾病到慢性疾病,包括与生活方式有关的疾病,一线卫生保健人员需要特定的方法来了解潜在的病理生理,并在临床实践中有效地利用这些病理生理信息。参考区间通常定义为参考分布的第2.5和97.5个百分位数之间的区间。当临床值在参考区间内时,结果通常被评为“a”。仅从评分来看,考生可能会从喜悦转为悲伤,或者医疗保健提供者可能会认为个人没有疾病。当我们解释实验室数据时,密切观察不同年龄的变化是很重要的。无论评级如何,医疗保健提供者必须注意与先前结果的过渡变化。有必要评估该值是否达到参考限值或是否正在迅速恶化。此外,我们应该注意不要只抓住一个参数不放。疾病风险通常使用多个因素进行评估,我们不应该仅仅因为一个参数在参考区间内就认为结果反映了无疾病状态。随着年龄的增长,高血压、血脂异常、糖尿病、高尿酸血症等与生活方式相关疾病的相关参数往往被评为“需要密切观察”或“需要重新评估”。在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keys to the Interpretation of Clinical Data —Approaches to Understanding Underlying Pathophysiology and Effective Utilization of Pathophysiological Information in Clinical Practice—
Health screening/Ningen Dock loses much of its value if the examinees simply undergo health-checks without reflecting on the results (for healthcare providers, if they simply provide health examinations without paying attention to the results). Routine examinations, not necessarily expensive ones, can provide a great deal of information that—depending on how the data is interpreted—can be meaningful to living a long healthy life. From acute to chronic diseases, including lifestyle-related diseases, front-line health care personnel require specific approaches to understanding the underlying pathophysiology and effectively utilizing this pathophysiological information in their clinical practice. Reference intervals are, in general, defined as intervals between the 2.5 th and 97.5 th percentiles of the reference distribution. When a clinical value is within the reference interval, the result is usually rated as “A”. From a rating alone, an examinee may be moved from joy to sorrow, or a healthcare provider may consider an individual to be disease-free. It is important to closely observe the changes across ages when we interpret laboratory data. Regardless of the rating, healthcare providers must pay attention to the transitional change from the previous results. It is necessary to evaluate whether the value is reaching to the reference limit or whether it is rapidly worsening. In addition, we should be careful not to cling onto just one parameter. Disease risks are often evaluated using multiple factors, and we should not consider the results to reflect a disease-free status just because a parameter is within the reference interval. With advancing age, the parameters associated with lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hyperuricemia tend to be rated as “needing close observation” or “needing re-evaluation”. On the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信