椎间盘损伤似然量表及杯盘比诊断青光眼的准确性

Sumbal Azeem, C. Ahmad, Abdul Basit, Syed Sajid Hussain, Najm-ul-Saqib Malik
{"title":"椎间盘损伤似然量表及杯盘比诊断青光眼的准确性","authors":"Sumbal Azeem, C. Ahmad, Abdul Basit, Syed Sajid Hussain, Najm-ul-Saqib Malik","doi":"10.36351/pjo.v39i3.1609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:  To find the diagnostic accuracy of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) for diagnosis of glaucoma taking CCT adjusted IOP and characteristic visual filed defects with corresponding OCT-ONH changes as standard.\nStudy Design:  Comparative, cross-sectional.\nPlace and Duration of Study:  Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, from August 2020 to February 2021.\nMethods:  Three hundred and nine patients were enrolled after taking informed consent. Demographic data was obtained, and patients underwent complete ocular exam including DDLS and CDR, Slit-lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy and Intraocular pressure (IOP). Central corneal thickness, visual fields and OCT ONH was done. The patient was said to have glaucoma if his CCT adjusted IOP was greater than 21 mmHg, visual field defects and OCT changes. It was compared with CDR and DDLS, which was taken as suggestive of glaucoma with scores greater than 5.\nResults:  Mean age of patients was 54.82 ± 9.29 years, 108 (34.95%) were males. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of DDLS for detection of glaucoma was 78.57%, 84.97% and 80.91% and the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of CDR for detection of glaucoma was 82.14%, 49.56% & 70.23% taking CCT adjusted IOP and characteristic visual field defects with corresponding OCT changes as standard.\nConclusion:  Disk Damage likelihood scale is useful, cost effective and has higher accuracy to detect glaucomatous damage as compared to cup-to-disc ratio for diagnosis of glaucoma taking CCT adjusted IOP and characteristic visual field defects with corresponding OCT changes as standard.","PeriodicalId":169886,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale and Cup-To-Disc Ratio for Diagnosis of Glaucoma\",\"authors\":\"Sumbal Azeem, C. Ahmad, Abdul Basit, Syed Sajid Hussain, Najm-ul-Saqib Malik\",\"doi\":\"10.36351/pjo.v39i3.1609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose:  To find the diagnostic accuracy of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) for diagnosis of glaucoma taking CCT adjusted IOP and characteristic visual filed defects with corresponding OCT-ONH changes as standard.\\nStudy Design:  Comparative, cross-sectional.\\nPlace and Duration of Study:  Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, from August 2020 to February 2021.\\nMethods:  Three hundred and nine patients were enrolled after taking informed consent. Demographic data was obtained, and patients underwent complete ocular exam including DDLS and CDR, Slit-lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy and Intraocular pressure (IOP). Central corneal thickness, visual fields and OCT ONH was done. The patient was said to have glaucoma if his CCT adjusted IOP was greater than 21 mmHg, visual field defects and OCT changes. It was compared with CDR and DDLS, which was taken as suggestive of glaucoma with scores greater than 5.\\nResults:  Mean age of patients was 54.82 ± 9.29 years, 108 (34.95%) were males. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of DDLS for detection of glaucoma was 78.57%, 84.97% and 80.91% and the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of CDR for detection of glaucoma was 82.14%, 49.56% & 70.23% taking CCT adjusted IOP and characteristic visual field defects with corresponding OCT changes as standard.\\nConclusion:  Disk Damage likelihood scale is useful, cost effective and has higher accuracy to detect glaucomatous damage as compared to cup-to-disc ratio for diagnosis of glaucoma taking CCT adjusted IOP and characteristic visual field defects with corresponding OCT changes as standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i3.1609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i3.1609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨椎间盘损伤似然量表(DDLS)和杯盘比(CDR)对以CCT调整IOP和相应OCT-ONH变化的视场缺陷为标准诊断青光眼的准确性。研究设计:比较,横断面。学习地点和时间:2020年8月至2021年2月,拉合尔梅奥医院眼科。方法:采用知情同意法对309例患者进行研究。获得人口统计学资料,并对患者进行完整的眼部检查,包括DDLS和CDR、裂隙灯生物显微镜、角镜检查和眼压(IOP)。观察角膜中央厚度、视野及OCT ONH。如果CCT调整IOP大于21 mmHg,视野缺损和OCT改变,则认为患者患有青光眼。与CDR、DDLS进行比较,评分大于5分视为青光眼的提示。结果:患者平均年龄54.82±9.29岁,男性108例(34.95%)。DDLS检测青光眼的灵敏度、特异性和诊断准确率分别为78.57%、84.97%和80.91%;以CCT调整IOP和相应OCT变化的特征性视野缺损为标准,CDR检测青光眼的灵敏度、特异性和诊断准确率分别为82.14%、49.56%和70.23%。结论:以CCT调整IOP及相应OCT变化的特征性视野缺陷为标准诊断青光眼,与杯盘比相比,盘损伤似然量表检测青光眼损伤有用、经济、准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale and Cup-To-Disc Ratio for Diagnosis of Glaucoma
Purpose:  To find the diagnostic accuracy of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) for diagnosis of glaucoma taking CCT adjusted IOP and characteristic visual filed defects with corresponding OCT-ONH changes as standard. Study Design:  Comparative, cross-sectional. Place and Duration of Study:  Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, from August 2020 to February 2021. Methods:  Three hundred and nine patients were enrolled after taking informed consent. Demographic data was obtained, and patients underwent complete ocular exam including DDLS and CDR, Slit-lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy and Intraocular pressure (IOP). Central corneal thickness, visual fields and OCT ONH was done. The patient was said to have glaucoma if his CCT adjusted IOP was greater than 21 mmHg, visual field defects and OCT changes. It was compared with CDR and DDLS, which was taken as suggestive of glaucoma with scores greater than 5. Results:  Mean age of patients was 54.82 ± 9.29 years, 108 (34.95%) were males. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of DDLS for detection of glaucoma was 78.57%, 84.97% and 80.91% and the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of CDR for detection of glaucoma was 82.14%, 49.56% & 70.23% taking CCT adjusted IOP and characteristic visual field defects with corresponding OCT changes as standard. Conclusion:  Disk Damage likelihood scale is useful, cost effective and has higher accuracy to detect glaucomatous damage as compared to cup-to-disc ratio for diagnosis of glaucoma taking CCT adjusted IOP and characteristic visual field defects with corresponding OCT changes as standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信