表征形式和计算机代理数量对一致性的影响

Eun-Ju Lee, C. Nass
{"title":"表征形式和计算机代理数量对一致性的影响","authors":"Eun-Ju Lee, C. Nass","doi":"10.1145/632716.632864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we demonstrate that the form of representation (character vs. text box) and the number (one vs. four) of computer agents affect people's conformity as well as attitudes toward the agent. A text box, as compared to a simple stick figure, induced more opinion change as well as eliciting more conformity. Interestingly, one text box was rated better than four text boxes in terms of social attractiveness, social presence, and trustworthiness, while the opposite was true of character.","PeriodicalId":263696,"journal":{"name":"CHI '99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the form of representation and number of computer agents on conformity\",\"authors\":\"Eun-Ju Lee, C. Nass\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/632716.632864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we demonstrate that the form of representation (character vs. text box) and the number (one vs. four) of computer agents affect people's conformity as well as attitudes toward the agent. A text box, as compared to a simple stick figure, induced more opinion change as well as eliciting more conformity. Interestingly, one text box was rated better than four text boxes in terms of social attractiveness, social presence, and trustworthiness, while the opposite was true of character.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHI '99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHI '99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/632716.632864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHI '99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/632716.632864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在本文中,我们证明了计算机代理的表示形式(字符vs文本框)和数量(1 vs 4)会影响人们的从众性以及对代理的态度。一个文本框,与一个简单的简笔画相比,引起了更多的意见变化,也引起了更多的一致性。有趣的是,在社交吸引力、社交存在感和可信度方面,一个文本框被评为比四个文本框更好,而性格则相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of the form of representation and number of computer agents on conformity
In this paper, we demonstrate that the form of representation (character vs. text box) and the number (one vs. four) of computer agents affect people's conformity as well as attitudes toward the agent. A text box, as compared to a simple stick figure, induced more opinion change as well as eliciting more conformity. Interestingly, one text box was rated better than four text boxes in terms of social attractiveness, social presence, and trustworthiness, while the opposite was true of character.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信