基于《电子交易信息法》的企业诽谤罪举报人

Dwikarunia Setiawan Guntik, Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan
{"title":"基于《电子交易信息法》的企业诽谤罪举报人","authors":"Dwikarunia Setiawan Guntik, Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan","doi":"10.55047/polri.v1i1.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of writing this article is to find out whether the corporation can be a reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law. The methods performed in writing this article are normative legal research methods that use a type of statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that the regulation of defamation crimes stipulated in the Criminal Code and ITE Law, corporations cannot be the reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law because based on letter a guidelines for the implementation of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of SkB No. 2/VI/2021 on guidelines for the implementation of the ITE Law stipulate that the understanding of the content of insults and / or defamation must refer to the provisions of Article 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code in addition to letter f The implementation guidelines of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law stipulates that victims who can become whistleblowers are only individuals with a specific identity so that corporations cannot be reporting parties under the ITE Law. Corporations cannot be the reporting party should be included in the article explanation to be binding in an arrangement because the nature of the DECREE containing implementation guidelines is only binding on law enforcement only. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":434803,"journal":{"name":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CORPORATIONS AS WHISTLEBLOWERS IN THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION BASED ON THE ELECTRONIC AND TRANSACTION INFORMATION ACT\",\"authors\":\"Dwikarunia Setiawan Guntik, Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan\",\"doi\":\"10.55047/polri.v1i1.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of writing this article is to find out whether the corporation can be a reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law. The methods performed in writing this article are normative legal research methods that use a type of statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that the regulation of defamation crimes stipulated in the Criminal Code and ITE Law, corporations cannot be the reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law because based on letter a guidelines for the implementation of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of SkB No. 2/VI/2021 on guidelines for the implementation of the ITE Law stipulate that the understanding of the content of insults and / or defamation must refer to the provisions of Article 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code in addition to letter f The implementation guidelines of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law stipulates that victims who can become whistleblowers are only individuals with a specific identity so that corporations cannot be reporting parties under the ITE Law. Corporations cannot be the reporting party should be included in the article explanation to be binding in an arrangement because the nature of the DECREE containing implementation guidelines is only binding on law enforcement only. \\n  \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":434803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i1.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i1.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

写这篇文章的目的是为了了解公司是否可以在诽谤犯罪行为中成为举报方。在撰写这篇文章的方法是规范性的法律研究方法,使用一种法定方法和概念方法。研究结果表明,刑法和信息技术法对诽谤犯罪的规制;企业不能报道党诽谤,尽管法律规定的犯罪行为,因为基于信指导方针的实施SkB第二十七条(3)款2号/ VI / 2021指南的实施尽管法律规定的理解侮辱或诽谤的内容必须是指本法第310条和311年的刑法除了字母f的实施细则尽管第二十七条(3)款法律规定,只有具有特定身份的个人才能成为举报人,因此企业不能成为举报对象。公司不能是报告方,应在条款解释中列入对一项安排具有约束力的条款,因为载有执行准则的法令的性质只对执法具有约束力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CORPORATIONS AS WHISTLEBLOWERS IN THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION BASED ON THE ELECTRONIC AND TRANSACTION INFORMATION ACT
The purpose of writing this article is to find out whether the corporation can be a reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law. The methods performed in writing this article are normative legal research methods that use a type of statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that the regulation of defamation crimes stipulated in the Criminal Code and ITE Law, corporations cannot be the reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law because based on letter a guidelines for the implementation of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of SkB No. 2/VI/2021 on guidelines for the implementation of the ITE Law stipulate that the understanding of the content of insults and / or defamation must refer to the provisions of Article 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code in addition to letter f The implementation guidelines of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law stipulates that victims who can become whistleblowers are only individuals with a specific identity so that corporations cannot be reporting parties under the ITE Law. Corporations cannot be the reporting party should be included in the article explanation to be binding in an arrangement because the nature of the DECREE containing implementation guidelines is only binding on law enforcement only.    
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信