多专家系统的模糊推理

Junian Li, Tong Li, Liping Guo
{"title":"多专家系统的模糊推理","authors":"Junian Li, Tong Li, Liping Guo","doi":"10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In multi expert systems (ES), difficulties arise when experts dealing with the same problem have different opinions, even opposite ones, which is especially true for traditional Chinese doctors. For the same patient, some doctors suggest a nourishing method and others recommend a dissipating method. Although diagnosis and therapy are completely contrasting among doctors the results may be the same. However, it would be difficult to combine their knowledge and rules together. The paper is intended to solve the above mentioned problem via automatic inference and decision in a multi expert system. Although the suggested model is especially suitable for the automatic inference and decision making in a medicinal multi expert system, it is generally useful for any multi expert systems.","PeriodicalId":298915,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fuzzy reasoning of multi-expert system\",\"authors\":\"Junian Li, Tong Li, Liping Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In multi expert systems (ES), difficulties arise when experts dealing with the same problem have different opinions, even opposite ones, which is especially true for traditional Chinese doctors. For the same patient, some doctors suggest a nourishing method and others recommend a dissipating method. Although diagnosis and therapy are completely contrasting among doctors the results may be the same. However, it would be difficult to combine their knowledge and rules together. The paper is intended to solve the above mentioned problem via automatic inference and decision in a multi expert system. Although the suggested model is especially suitable for the automatic inference and decision making in a medicinal multi expert system, it is generally useful for any multi expert systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在多专家系统中,专家对同一问题的意见不同,甚至相反,会产生困难,这对中医来说尤其如此。对于同一个病人,一些医生建议用滋补法,而另一些医生建议用消散法。虽然医生之间的诊断和治疗完全不同,但结果可能是一样的。然而,很难将他们的知识和规则结合在一起。本文旨在通过多专家系统中的自动推理和决策来解决上述问题。虽然该模型特别适用于医学多专家系统的自动推理和决策,但它对任何多专家系统都是通用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The fuzzy reasoning of multi-expert system
In multi expert systems (ES), difficulties arise when experts dealing with the same problem have different opinions, even opposite ones, which is especially true for traditional Chinese doctors. For the same patient, some doctors suggest a nourishing method and others recommend a dissipating method. Although diagnosis and therapy are completely contrasting among doctors the results may be the same. However, it would be difficult to combine their knowledge and rules together. The paper is intended to solve the above mentioned problem via automatic inference and decision in a multi expert system. Although the suggested model is especially suitable for the automatic inference and decision making in a medicinal multi expert system, it is generally useful for any multi expert systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信