不惜一切(社会)代价执行契约:私人合同法与公共利益的边界

Deborah Zalesne
{"title":"不惜一切(社会)代价执行契约:私人合同法与公共利益的边界","authors":"Deborah Zalesne","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the examples posed by the panelists, this Article explores the limitations on the ability of contract law to deal with the protection of third parties and the public. This limitation is manifested in two distinct ways: (1) Commercial contracts are typically enforced without regard to the negative impact they may have on the public; and (2) although some courts appear willing to stretch the bounds of the law to ensure contracts are enforced in commercial contexts, there has been substantially less motivation to enforce contracts for the public good. Accordingly, Part III will discuss the innovative and flexible nature of the common law of contracts as it applies to protecting commercial interests and players and its concomitant insensitivity toward the public interest. Part IV will address the inadequacy of contract law as a means of protecting public and non-economic interests.","PeriodicalId":223617,"journal":{"name":"Strategy Models for Firm Performance Enhancement eJournal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enforcing the Contract at All (Social) Costs: The Boundary Between Private Contract Law and the Public Interest\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Zalesne\",\"doi\":\"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the examples posed by the panelists, this Article explores the limitations on the ability of contract law to deal with the protection of third parties and the public. This limitation is manifested in two distinct ways: (1) Commercial contracts are typically enforced without regard to the negative impact they may have on the public; and (2) although some courts appear willing to stretch the bounds of the law to ensure contracts are enforced in commercial contexts, there has been substantially less motivation to enforce contracts for the public good. Accordingly, Part III will discuss the innovative and flexible nature of the common law of contracts as it applies to protecting commercial interests and players and its concomitant insensitivity toward the public interest. Part IV will address the inadequacy of contract law as a means of protecting public and non-economic interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategy Models for Firm Performance Enhancement eJournal\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategy Models for Firm Performance Enhancement eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy Models for Firm Performance Enhancement eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文通过专家组成员提出的例子,探讨了合同法在保护第三方和公众方面能力的局限性。这种限制表现在两个不同的方面:(1)商业合同的执行通常不考虑它们可能对公众产生的负面影响;(2)尽管一些法院似乎愿意扩大法律的范围,以确保合同在商业环境中得到执行,但为了公共利益而执行合同的动机却大大减少。因此,第三部分将讨论普通法合同的创新性和灵活性,因为它适用于保护商业利益和参与者,以及随之而来的对公共利益的不敏感。第四部分将论述合同法作为保护公共利益和非经济利益的手段的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enforcing the Contract at All (Social) Costs: The Boundary Between Private Contract Law and the Public Interest
Using the examples posed by the panelists, this Article explores the limitations on the ability of contract law to deal with the protection of third parties and the public. This limitation is manifested in two distinct ways: (1) Commercial contracts are typically enforced without regard to the negative impact they may have on the public; and (2) although some courts appear willing to stretch the bounds of the law to ensure contracts are enforced in commercial contexts, there has been substantially less motivation to enforce contracts for the public good. Accordingly, Part III will discuss the innovative and flexible nature of the common law of contracts as it applies to protecting commercial interests and players and its concomitant insensitivity toward the public interest. Part IV will address the inadequacy of contract law as a means of protecting public and non-economic interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信