通过线索回忆来断言实时情绪:有效吗?

Anders Bruun, E. Law, Matthias Heintz, P. S. Eriksen
{"title":"通过线索回忆来断言实时情绪:有效吗?","authors":"Anders Bruun, E. Law, Matthias Heintz, P. S. Eriksen","doi":"10.1145/2971485.2971516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asserting emotions through free-recall is commonly used to evaluate user experience (UX) of interactive systems. From psychology we know that free-recall of emotions leads to a significant memory bias where participants rely on a few of the most intense episodes when asserting an overall experience. It is argued that cued-recall can reduce the memory bias in UX evaluations. Yet, this has not been studied empirically. We present a systematic empirical study based on 38 participants. We measured emotions in terms of objective galvanic skin responses (GSR) and subjective Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) ratings. We found significant correlations between emotions experienced in real-time and those experienced during cued-recall. This validates the use of cued-recall for UX evaluations. An implication is that HCI researchers and practitioners now have cued-recall as an alternative that significantly reduces the memory bias and enables highly detailed measurements of emotions while not disturbing participants during system interaction.","PeriodicalId":190768,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asserting Real-Time Emotions through Cued-Recall: Is it Valid?\",\"authors\":\"Anders Bruun, E. Law, Matthias Heintz, P. S. Eriksen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2971485.2971516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Asserting emotions through free-recall is commonly used to evaluate user experience (UX) of interactive systems. From psychology we know that free-recall of emotions leads to a significant memory bias where participants rely on a few of the most intense episodes when asserting an overall experience. It is argued that cued-recall can reduce the memory bias in UX evaluations. Yet, this has not been studied empirically. We present a systematic empirical study based on 38 participants. We measured emotions in terms of objective galvanic skin responses (GSR) and subjective Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) ratings. We found significant correlations between emotions experienced in real-time and those experienced during cued-recall. This validates the use of cued-recall for UX evaluations. An implication is that HCI researchers and practitioners now have cued-recall as an alternative that significantly reduces the memory bias and enables highly detailed measurements of emotions while not disturbing participants during system interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":190768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

通过自由回忆来断言情感通常用于评估交互系统的用户体验。从心理学上我们知道,自由回忆情绪会导致显著的记忆偏差,即参与者在断言整体经历时依赖于几个最激烈的情节。提示回忆可以减少用户体验评估中的记忆偏差。然而,这还没有经过实证研究。本文对38名参与者进行了系统的实证研究。我们根据客观皮肤电反应(GSR)和主观自我评估模型(SAM)评分来测量情绪。我们发现,实时体验的情绪与线索回忆的情绪之间存在显著的相关性。这验证了在用户体验评估中使用提示召回。这意味着,HCI研究人员和实践者现在已经将提示回忆作为一种替代方法,可以显著减少记忆偏差,并能够非常详细地测量情绪,同时在系统交互过程中不会干扰参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asserting Real-Time Emotions through Cued-Recall: Is it Valid?
Asserting emotions through free-recall is commonly used to evaluate user experience (UX) of interactive systems. From psychology we know that free-recall of emotions leads to a significant memory bias where participants rely on a few of the most intense episodes when asserting an overall experience. It is argued that cued-recall can reduce the memory bias in UX evaluations. Yet, this has not been studied empirically. We present a systematic empirical study based on 38 participants. We measured emotions in terms of objective galvanic skin responses (GSR) and subjective Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) ratings. We found significant correlations between emotions experienced in real-time and those experienced during cued-recall. This validates the use of cued-recall for UX evaluations. An implication is that HCI researchers and practitioners now have cued-recall as an alternative that significantly reduces the memory bias and enables highly detailed measurements of emotions while not disturbing participants during system interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信