从神经科学的角度看治疗联盟和谈话如何改变大脑:支持心理治疗的共同因素模型

Nicole Hess
{"title":"从神经科学的角度看治疗联盟和谈话如何改变大脑:支持心理治疗的共同因素模型","authors":"Nicole Hess","doi":"10.59158/001c.71106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, the efficacy and application of psychotherapeutic treatments has been informed and driven by a medical model of understanding. Within this framework, for a psychotherapeutic treatment to be classified as “empirically supported,” the therapeutic intervention alone must be demonstrated to be the mechanism responsible for change. With 85% of the psychotherapeutic outcome accounted for by non-specific factors (that do not include the type of therapy engaged in) this framework of understanding is seriously problematic and undermines the evidence-based efficacy of most psychotherapies. Research clearly identifies that interpersonal factors, including the therapeutic alliance, are robust predictors of successful outcomes in therapy and these findings are further supported by neuroscientific evidence. The current paper describes the neuro-correlates of psychotherapy and how these are operationalised through talking and the therapeutic alliance. Recommendations are presented in support of an integrative approach to psychotherapy that is guided by person-centred, idiographic considerations, yet underpinned by neuroscientific and evidence-based treatment protocols.","PeriodicalId":394035,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Neuroscientific Perspective on the Therapeutic Alliance and How Talking Changes the Brain: Supporting a Common Factors Model of Psychotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Hess\",\"doi\":\"10.59158/001c.71106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For decades, the efficacy and application of psychotherapeutic treatments has been informed and driven by a medical model of understanding. Within this framework, for a psychotherapeutic treatment to be classified as “empirically supported,” the therapeutic intervention alone must be demonstrated to be the mechanism responsible for change. With 85% of the psychotherapeutic outcome accounted for by non-specific factors (that do not include the type of therapy engaged in) this framework of understanding is seriously problematic and undermines the evidence-based efficacy of most psychotherapies. Research clearly identifies that interpersonal factors, including the therapeutic alliance, are robust predictors of successful outcomes in therapy and these findings are further supported by neuroscientific evidence. The current paper describes the neuro-correlates of psychotherapy and how these are operationalised through talking and the therapeutic alliance. Recommendations are presented in support of an integrative approach to psychotherapy that is guided by person-centred, idiographic considerations, yet underpinned by neuroscientific and evidence-based treatment protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59158/001c.71106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59158/001c.71106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,心理治疗的疗效和应用一直是由一种理解的医学模式所告知和驱动的。在这个框架内,对于一种被归类为“经验支持”的心理治疗,治疗干预本身必须被证明是导致改变的机制。由于85%的心理治疗结果是由非特定因素(不包括所从事的治疗类型)造成的,这种理解框架存在严重问题,并破坏了大多数心理治疗的循证有效性。研究清楚地表明,人际因素,包括治疗联盟,是治疗成功结果的有力预测因素,这些发现得到了神经科学证据的进一步支持。目前的论文描述了心理治疗的神经相关性,以及这些是如何通过谈话和治疗联盟进行操作的。提出的建议支持以人为本、具体考虑为指导,但以神经科学和循证治疗方案为基础的综合心理治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Neuroscientific Perspective on the Therapeutic Alliance and How Talking Changes the Brain: Supporting a Common Factors Model of Psychotherapy
For decades, the efficacy and application of psychotherapeutic treatments has been informed and driven by a medical model of understanding. Within this framework, for a psychotherapeutic treatment to be classified as “empirically supported,” the therapeutic intervention alone must be demonstrated to be the mechanism responsible for change. With 85% of the psychotherapeutic outcome accounted for by non-specific factors (that do not include the type of therapy engaged in) this framework of understanding is seriously problematic and undermines the evidence-based efficacy of most psychotherapies. Research clearly identifies that interpersonal factors, including the therapeutic alliance, are robust predictors of successful outcomes in therapy and these findings are further supported by neuroscientific evidence. The current paper describes the neuro-correlates of psychotherapy and how these are operationalised through talking and the therapeutic alliance. Recommendations are presented in support of an integrative approach to psychotherapy that is guided by person-centred, idiographic considerations, yet underpinned by neuroscientific and evidence-based treatment protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信