H. Iqbal, Mushtaque Ahmed, Nabeela Mahboob, S. Afrin, K. Z. Mamun
{"title":"孟加拉国伤口拭子细菌的敏感性:基于实验室的监测研究","authors":"H. Iqbal, Mushtaque Ahmed, Nabeela Mahboob, S. Afrin, K. Z. Mamun","doi":"10.3329/jdmc.v30i2.56924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Wound infection is one of the major health problems that occur frequently. Infections of the wound result from entry of the organisms through breached skin. It plays an important role in the development of chronicity, delaying wound healing. It is evident that wound infection is a challenging situation for the physicians. Multiple bacteria can cause wound infection. Both broad spectrum and narrow spectrum antibiotics are available for the treatment. It is ideal to give proper antibiotic after culture and sensitivity of the wound swab. Improper and irrational use of antibiotics can lead to drug resistance.\nObjective: To isolate and identify the bacteria causing wound infection and to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern.\nMaterials and method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out at the Microbiology Laboratory, Popular Diagnostic Centre Ltd, Dhanmondi, Dhaka, Bangladesh, from November 2019 to January 2020. A total of 62 wound swabs were collected and analyzed for culture and antibiotic sensitivity.\nResults: From total wound swab samples, 49 (79%) were culture positive. The most common isolated pathogen was Acinetobacter spp. 20 (40.81%). Other isolates were Staphylococcus aureus 10 (20.41%); Escherichia coli 07 (14.29%); Pseudomonas aeruginosa 07 (14.29%); Klebsiella 04 (08.16%) and Proteus 01 (02.04%). Among the Gram negative isolates, Acinetobacter spp showed 100% sensitivity to colistin, 85% to imipenem, 30% to amikacin and 25% to piperacillin + tazobactum. E. coli showed 100% sensitivity to imipenem and colistin and least sensitivity to third generation cephalosporin. Pseudomonas showed 100% sensitivity to piperacillin+tazobactum, 85.71% to imipenem and aztreonam. Among the Gram positive isolates, Staphylococcus aureus showed 100% sensitivity to linezolid, vancomycin, imipenem, cloxacillin, amikacin and least sensitivity to azithromycin.\nConclusion: Acinetobacter spp. was the most frequently isolated pathogen from wound swab and the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of various isolates will help the clinician in appropriate selection of antibiotics against wound infection.\nJ Dhaka Med Coll. 2021; 30(2) : 180-188","PeriodicalId":320976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Susceptibility of Bacterial Isolates From Wound Swabs in Bangladesh: Laboratory – Based Surveillance Study\",\"authors\":\"H. Iqbal, Mushtaque Ahmed, Nabeela Mahboob, S. Afrin, K. Z. Mamun\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jdmc.v30i2.56924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Wound infection is one of the major health problems that occur frequently. Infections of the wound result from entry of the organisms through breached skin. It plays an important role in the development of chronicity, delaying wound healing. It is evident that wound infection is a challenging situation for the physicians. Multiple bacteria can cause wound infection. Both broad spectrum and narrow spectrum antibiotics are available for the treatment. It is ideal to give proper antibiotic after culture and sensitivity of the wound swab. Improper and irrational use of antibiotics can lead to drug resistance.\\nObjective: To isolate and identify the bacteria causing wound infection and to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern.\\nMaterials and method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out at the Microbiology Laboratory, Popular Diagnostic Centre Ltd, Dhanmondi, Dhaka, Bangladesh, from November 2019 to January 2020. A total of 62 wound swabs were collected and analyzed for culture and antibiotic sensitivity.\\nResults: From total wound swab samples, 49 (79%) were culture positive. The most common isolated pathogen was Acinetobacter spp. 20 (40.81%). Other isolates were Staphylococcus aureus 10 (20.41%); Escherichia coli 07 (14.29%); Pseudomonas aeruginosa 07 (14.29%); Klebsiella 04 (08.16%) and Proteus 01 (02.04%). Among the Gram negative isolates, Acinetobacter spp showed 100% sensitivity to colistin, 85% to imipenem, 30% to amikacin and 25% to piperacillin + tazobactum. E. coli showed 100% sensitivity to imipenem and colistin and least sensitivity to third generation cephalosporin. Pseudomonas showed 100% sensitivity to piperacillin+tazobactum, 85.71% to imipenem and aztreonam. Among the Gram positive isolates, Staphylococcus aureus showed 100% sensitivity to linezolid, vancomycin, imipenem, cloxacillin, amikacin and least sensitivity to azithromycin.\\nConclusion: Acinetobacter spp. was the most frequently isolated pathogen from wound swab and the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of various isolates will help the clinician in appropriate selection of antibiotics against wound infection.\\nJ Dhaka Med Coll. 2021; 30(2) : 180-188\",\"PeriodicalId\":320976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dhaka Medical College\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dhaka Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jdmc.v30i2.56924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jdmc.v30i2.56924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:伤口感染是常见的主要健康问题之一。伤口感染是由于微生物通过破损的皮肤进入造成的。它在慢性的发展中起着重要的作用,延迟伤口愈合。很明显,伤口感染对医生来说是一个具有挑战性的情况。多种细菌可引起伤口感染。广谱和窄谱抗生素均可用于治疗。理想的做法是在培养和伤口拭子敏感后给予适当的抗生素。不当和不合理使用抗生素可导致耐药性。目的:分离鉴定引起创面感染的病原菌,并确定其药敏模式。材料和方法:本描述性横断面研究于2019年11月至2020年1月在孟加拉国达卡Dhanmondi市Popular Diagnostic Centre Ltd微生物实验室进行。收集62份伤口拭子进行培养和抗生素敏感性分析。结果:创面拭子培养阳性49例(79%)。最常见的病原菌为不动杆菌20(40.81%)。其他分离株为金黄色葡萄球菌10株(20.41%);大肠杆菌07 (14.29%);铜绿假单胞菌07 (14.29%);Klebsiella 04(08.16%)和Proteus 01(02.04%)。革兰阴性分离株中,不动杆菌对粘菌素的敏感性为100%,对亚胺培南的敏感性为85%,对阿米卡星的敏感性为30%,对哌拉西林+他唑巴坦的敏感性为25%。大肠杆菌对亚胺培南和粘菌素的敏感性为100%,对第三代头孢菌素的敏感性最低。假单胞菌对哌拉西林+他唑巴坦的敏感性为100%,对亚胺培南和氨曲南的敏感性为85.71%。革兰氏阳性菌株中,金黄色葡萄球菌对利奈唑胺、万古霉素、亚胺培南、氯西林、阿米卡星的敏感性为100%,对阿奇霉素的敏感性最低。结论:不动杆菌属是伤口拭子中最常见的病原菌,不同菌株的抗生素敏感型可以帮助临床医生合理选择抗生素治疗伤口感染。达卡医学院,2021;30(2): 180-188
Susceptibility of Bacterial Isolates From Wound Swabs in Bangladesh: Laboratory – Based Surveillance Study
Background: Wound infection is one of the major health problems that occur frequently. Infections of the wound result from entry of the organisms through breached skin. It plays an important role in the development of chronicity, delaying wound healing. It is evident that wound infection is a challenging situation for the physicians. Multiple bacteria can cause wound infection. Both broad spectrum and narrow spectrum antibiotics are available for the treatment. It is ideal to give proper antibiotic after culture and sensitivity of the wound swab. Improper and irrational use of antibiotics can lead to drug resistance.
Objective: To isolate and identify the bacteria causing wound infection and to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern.
Materials and method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out at the Microbiology Laboratory, Popular Diagnostic Centre Ltd, Dhanmondi, Dhaka, Bangladesh, from November 2019 to January 2020. A total of 62 wound swabs were collected and analyzed for culture and antibiotic sensitivity.
Results: From total wound swab samples, 49 (79%) were culture positive. The most common isolated pathogen was Acinetobacter spp. 20 (40.81%). Other isolates were Staphylococcus aureus 10 (20.41%); Escherichia coli 07 (14.29%); Pseudomonas aeruginosa 07 (14.29%); Klebsiella 04 (08.16%) and Proteus 01 (02.04%). Among the Gram negative isolates, Acinetobacter spp showed 100% sensitivity to colistin, 85% to imipenem, 30% to amikacin and 25% to piperacillin + tazobactum. E. coli showed 100% sensitivity to imipenem and colistin and least sensitivity to third generation cephalosporin. Pseudomonas showed 100% sensitivity to piperacillin+tazobactum, 85.71% to imipenem and aztreonam. Among the Gram positive isolates, Staphylococcus aureus showed 100% sensitivity to linezolid, vancomycin, imipenem, cloxacillin, amikacin and least sensitivity to azithromycin.
Conclusion: Acinetobacter spp. was the most frequently isolated pathogen from wound swab and the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of various isolates will help the clinician in appropriate selection of antibiotics against wound infection.
J Dhaka Med Coll. 2021; 30(2) : 180-188