胸膜病理质量指标。发表前后研究

Beatriz Morales Chacón, G. V. Centanaro, I. A. García, María Teresa Río Ramírez, N. Santamaría, A. G. Velando, M. Patrón, B. Steen
{"title":"胸膜病理质量指标。发表前后研究","authors":"Beatriz Morales Chacón, G. V. Centanaro, I. A. García, María Teresa Río Ramírez, N. Santamaría, A. G. Velando, M. Patrón, B. Steen","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Neumomadrid published in March 2017 the guide of quality indicators in respiratory diseases. Objective: To measure the level of compliance of two quality indicators in pleural pathology before and after this publication and to know if the elaboration of the guide has influenced our usual clinical practice. The chosen indicators are presence of informed consent in thoracentesis (TIC) and in transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNBIC). Material and Methods: Retrospective study carried out in 6 hospitals of the Community of Madrid. All thoracocentesis (T) and transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) performed by the Pneumology Service between 1/12/2016 to 28/02/2017 (before guide´s publication) and from 1/12/2017 to 28/02/2018 (after one) were selected. Exclusion criteria: patients 90% of the CR. Subsequently both results were compared. Statistic analysis by Stata v.12 (Pearson chi2 and Fisher’s exact). Results: are showen in tables and figures. Conclusions: The publication has not improved our level of compliance. To improve these results proactive measures should be established such as homogenizing and simplifying IC.","PeriodicalId":243267,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality indicators in pleural pathology. Pre and post publication study\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Morales Chacón, G. V. Centanaro, I. A. García, María Teresa Río Ramírez, N. Santamaría, A. G. Velando, M. Patrón, B. Steen\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Neumomadrid published in March 2017 the guide of quality indicators in respiratory diseases. Objective: To measure the level of compliance of two quality indicators in pleural pathology before and after this publication and to know if the elaboration of the guide has influenced our usual clinical practice. The chosen indicators are presence of informed consent in thoracentesis (TIC) and in transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNBIC). Material and Methods: Retrospective study carried out in 6 hospitals of the Community of Madrid. All thoracocentesis (T) and transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) performed by the Pneumology Service between 1/12/2016 to 28/02/2017 (before guide´s publication) and from 1/12/2017 to 28/02/2018 (after one) were selected. Exclusion criteria: patients 90% of the CR. Subsequently both results were compared. Statistic analysis by Stata v.12 (Pearson chi2 and Fisher’s exact). Results: are showen in tables and figures. Conclusions: The publication has not improved our level of compliance. To improve these results proactive measures should be established such as homogenizing and simplifying IC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics and Economics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:2017年3月,新马德里发布了呼吸系统疾病质量指标指南。目的:衡量本指南出版前后胸膜病理学两项质量指标的符合性水平,了解指南的阐述是否对我们的临床实践产生了影响。所选择的指标是在胸腔穿刺(TIC)和经胸穿刺活检(TTNBIC)中知情同意的存在。材料与方法:在马德里社区6家医院进行回顾性研究。选择2016年12月1日至2017年2月28日(指南发布前)和2017年12月1日至2018年2月28日(指南发布后)期间由肺科进行的所有胸穿刺术(T)和经胸穿刺活检(TTNB)。排除标准:90% CR的患者。随后对两种结果进行比较。Stata v.12的统计分析(Pearson chi2和Fisher精确)。结果:以表格和图所示。结论:该出版物并没有提高我们的依从性水平。为了改善这些结果,应采取同质化和简化集成电路等积极措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality indicators in pleural pathology. Pre and post publication study
Introduction: Neumomadrid published in March 2017 the guide of quality indicators in respiratory diseases. Objective: To measure the level of compliance of two quality indicators in pleural pathology before and after this publication and to know if the elaboration of the guide has influenced our usual clinical practice. The chosen indicators are presence of informed consent in thoracentesis (TIC) and in transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNBIC). Material and Methods: Retrospective study carried out in 6 hospitals of the Community of Madrid. All thoracocentesis (T) and transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) performed by the Pneumology Service between 1/12/2016 to 28/02/2017 (before guide´s publication) and from 1/12/2017 to 28/02/2018 (after one) were selected. Exclusion criteria: patients 90% of the CR. Subsequently both results were compared. Statistic analysis by Stata v.12 (Pearson chi2 and Fisher’s exact). Results: are showen in tables and figures. Conclusions: The publication has not improved our level of compliance. To improve these results proactive measures should be established such as homogenizing and simplifying IC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信