比较知识的上下文表示和平面表示:一个关于足球数据的具体案例

Loris Bozzato, Chiara Ghidini, L. Serafini
{"title":"比较知识的上下文表示和平面表示:一个关于足球数据的具体案例","authors":"Loris Bozzato, Chiara Ghidini, L. Serafini","doi":"10.1145/2479832.2479842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The capability of dealing with context sensitive knowledge is recognized as a crucial aspect in the management of massive amounts of Semantic Web (SW) data. Contextual knowledge can be modelled either by adopting the primitives from RDF/OWL based SW languages or by extending such languages with new specific constructs for context representation. In this paper, we show the benefits of the context-based solution by comparing modelling and reasoning in the two approaches on the paradigmatic use case of FIFA World Cup. The comparison considers the three key aspects of engineering and exploiting knowledge: (i) simplicity and expressivity of the (formal) language; (ii) compactness of the representation; and (iii) efficiency of reasoning. As for (i), we show that the context-based language enables the construction of simpler and more intuitive models while the RDF/OWL \"flat\" model presents practical limitations in modelling cross-contextual knowledge. For (ii), we show that the contextualized model is more compact than the OWL based model. Finally for (iii), query answering in the context-based model outperforms in most of the cases performances on the flat model.","PeriodicalId":388497,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Knowledge capture","volume":"468 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing contextual and flat representations ofknowledge: a concrete case about football data\",\"authors\":\"Loris Bozzato, Chiara Ghidini, L. Serafini\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2479832.2479842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The capability of dealing with context sensitive knowledge is recognized as a crucial aspect in the management of massive amounts of Semantic Web (SW) data. Contextual knowledge can be modelled either by adopting the primitives from RDF/OWL based SW languages or by extending such languages with new specific constructs for context representation. In this paper, we show the benefits of the context-based solution by comparing modelling and reasoning in the two approaches on the paradigmatic use case of FIFA World Cup. The comparison considers the three key aspects of engineering and exploiting knowledge: (i) simplicity and expressivity of the (formal) language; (ii) compactness of the representation; and (iii) efficiency of reasoning. As for (i), we show that the context-based language enables the construction of simpler and more intuitive models while the RDF/OWL \\\"flat\\\" model presents practical limitations in modelling cross-contextual knowledge. For (ii), we show that the contextualized model is more compact than the OWL based model. Finally for (iii), query answering in the context-based model outperforms in most of the cases performances on the flat model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Knowledge capture\",\"volume\":\"468 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Knowledge capture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2479832.2479842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Knowledge capture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2479832.2479842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

处理上下文敏感知识的能力被认为是管理大量语义Web (SW)数据的一个关键方面。上下文知识可以通过采用基于RDF/OWL的软件语言的原语来建模,也可以通过使用新的特定结构来扩展这些语言来进行上下文表示。在本文中,我们通过比较两种方法在FIFA世界杯的范例用例中的建模和推理,展示了基于上下文的解决方案的好处。比较考虑了工程和开发知识的三个关键方面:(i)(形式)语言的简单性和表达性;(ii)表示的紧凑性;(三)推理效率。对于(i),我们表明基于上下文的语言能够构建更简单和更直观的模型,而RDF/OWL“扁平”模型在跨上下文知识建模方面存在实际限制。对于(ii),我们表明上下文化模型比基于OWL的模型更紧凑。最后,对于(iii),基于上下文的模型中的查询回答在大多数情况下优于平面模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing contextual and flat representations ofknowledge: a concrete case about football data
The capability of dealing with context sensitive knowledge is recognized as a crucial aspect in the management of massive amounts of Semantic Web (SW) data. Contextual knowledge can be modelled either by adopting the primitives from RDF/OWL based SW languages or by extending such languages with new specific constructs for context representation. In this paper, we show the benefits of the context-based solution by comparing modelling and reasoning in the two approaches on the paradigmatic use case of FIFA World Cup. The comparison considers the three key aspects of engineering and exploiting knowledge: (i) simplicity and expressivity of the (formal) language; (ii) compactness of the representation; and (iii) efficiency of reasoning. As for (i), we show that the context-based language enables the construction of simpler and more intuitive models while the RDF/OWL "flat" model presents practical limitations in modelling cross-contextual knowledge. For (ii), we show that the contextualized model is more compact than the OWL based model. Finally for (iii), query answering in the context-based model outperforms in most of the cases performances on the flat model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信