基于协作模式的教与学领域建模:一个对照实验

N. Bolloju
{"title":"基于协作模式的教与学领域建模:一个对照实验","authors":"N. Bolloju","doi":"10.1145/3513139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Domain models in software engineering—often represented as class diagrams—depict relevant classes in a given problem domain along with necessary relationships among those classes. These models are important because they establish links between the requirements of a given system under development and the subsequent phases of the systems development life cycle. Although the teaching of basic concepts related to domain modeling takes only about 1 or 2 hours, proper application of these concepts to a given problem situation is difficult for students studying software engineering. Due to their insufficient domain knowledge of the problem situation and modeling experience, they often produce domain models that may not adequately represent necessary elements as part of the domain models. Analysis patterns can help them by encoding expert knowledge and offering guidance in the modeling process. This article reports the findings from a controlled experiment conducted to study the effects of collaboration patterns on the domain modeling process by students. Specifically, the study investigated the differences in students’ perceptions of the ease of the domain modeling process and quality of models produced, perceived difficulties, and how collaboration patterns help address domain modeling difficulties and the quality of domain models produced. Findings from this experimental study involving students from a software engineering course indicate that although there is no significant difference in subjects’ perceptions between the control and treatment groups, the subjects from the treatment group produced better-quality domain models. Additionally, the qualitative analysis of the feedback collected from the subjects from the control and treatment groups reveals that that having knowledge of patterns is beneficial, as it addresses the difficulties in domain modeling.","PeriodicalId":352564,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching and Learning Domain Modeling through Collaboration Patterns: A Controlled Experiment\",\"authors\":\"N. Bolloju\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3513139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Domain models in software engineering—often represented as class diagrams—depict relevant classes in a given problem domain along with necessary relationships among those classes. These models are important because they establish links between the requirements of a given system under development and the subsequent phases of the systems development life cycle. Although the teaching of basic concepts related to domain modeling takes only about 1 or 2 hours, proper application of these concepts to a given problem situation is difficult for students studying software engineering. Due to their insufficient domain knowledge of the problem situation and modeling experience, they often produce domain models that may not adequately represent necessary elements as part of the domain models. Analysis patterns can help them by encoding expert knowledge and offering guidance in the modeling process. This article reports the findings from a controlled experiment conducted to study the effects of collaboration patterns on the domain modeling process by students. Specifically, the study investigated the differences in students’ perceptions of the ease of the domain modeling process and quality of models produced, perceived difficulties, and how collaboration patterns help address domain modeling difficulties and the quality of domain models produced. Findings from this experimental study involving students from a software engineering course indicate that although there is no significant difference in subjects’ perceptions between the control and treatment groups, the subjects from the treatment group produced better-quality domain models. Additionally, the qualitative analysis of the feedback collected from the subjects from the control and treatment groups reveals that that having knowledge of patterns is beneficial, as it addresses the difficulties in domain modeling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3513139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3513139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软件工程中的领域模型——通常表示为类图——描述给定问题领域中的相关类以及这些类之间的必要关系。这些模型很重要,因为它们在开发中的给定系统的需求和系统开发生命周期的后续阶段之间建立了联系。尽管与领域建模相关的基本概念的教学只需要大约1到2个小时,但是对于学习软件工程的学生来说,将这些概念正确地应用于给定的问题情况是困难的。由于他们对问题情况和建模经验的领域知识不足,他们经常产生的领域模型可能不能充分地表示作为领域模型一部分的必要元素。分析模式可以通过对专家知识进行编码并在建模过程中提供指导来帮助他们。本文报告了一项对照实验的结果,该实验旨在研究协作模式对学生领域建模过程的影响。具体地说,该研究调查了学生对领域建模过程的难易程度和产生的模型质量的看法差异,感知到的困难,以及协作模式如何帮助解决领域建模困难和产生的领域模型质量。这项涉及软件工程课程学生的实验研究结果表明,尽管控制组和处理组之间受试者的感知没有显著差异,但处理组的受试者产生了质量更好的领域模型。此外,对从控制组和处理组的受试者收集的反馈的定性分析表明,拥有模式知识是有益的,因为它解决了领域建模中的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching and Learning Domain Modeling through Collaboration Patterns: A Controlled Experiment
Domain models in software engineering—often represented as class diagrams—depict relevant classes in a given problem domain along with necessary relationships among those classes. These models are important because they establish links between the requirements of a given system under development and the subsequent phases of the systems development life cycle. Although the teaching of basic concepts related to domain modeling takes only about 1 or 2 hours, proper application of these concepts to a given problem situation is difficult for students studying software engineering. Due to their insufficient domain knowledge of the problem situation and modeling experience, they often produce domain models that may not adequately represent necessary elements as part of the domain models. Analysis patterns can help them by encoding expert knowledge and offering guidance in the modeling process. This article reports the findings from a controlled experiment conducted to study the effects of collaboration patterns on the domain modeling process by students. Specifically, the study investigated the differences in students’ perceptions of the ease of the domain modeling process and quality of models produced, perceived difficulties, and how collaboration patterns help address domain modeling difficulties and the quality of domain models produced. Findings from this experimental study involving students from a software engineering course indicate that although there is no significant difference in subjects’ perceptions between the control and treatment groups, the subjects from the treatment group produced better-quality domain models. Additionally, the qualitative analysis of the feedback collected from the subjects from the control and treatment groups reveals that that having knowledge of patterns is beneficial, as it addresses the difficulties in domain modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信