医疗器械可靠性的开发与改进

J. A. McLinn
{"title":"医疗器械可靠性的开发与改进","authors":"J. A. McLinn","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1996.500668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new medical blood analyzer (laboratory instrument) was designed, developed and readied for production. Near the end of this series of activities, ten prototype systems exhibited lower than desired reliability in a development test. It was unclear to the designers why this had occurred as \"the best design criteria\" were employed. A short, controlled, full life test was proposed as a means to quantify the probable types and frequency of failure. This paper details the reliability findings at this point as well as methods for improvement of the typical product. Some of the technical choices and tradeoffs for reliability, maintainability, field performance, costs and quality as well as engineering decisions associated with reliability and field support are identified. Close attention is paid to the identification of a small number of important reliability measures. The reliability, maintainability, support and improvement data should prove highly instructive for any commercial or consumer company wishing to justify starting or continuing the reliability improvement process. Benchmark data is presented to aid others in establishing progress points during development. The data represents a blend of several similar systems.","PeriodicalId":393833,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability development and improvement of a medical instrument\",\"authors\":\"J. A. McLinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.1996.500668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new medical blood analyzer (laboratory instrument) was designed, developed and readied for production. Near the end of this series of activities, ten prototype systems exhibited lower than desired reliability in a development test. It was unclear to the designers why this had occurred as \\\"the best design criteria\\\" were employed. A short, controlled, full life test was proposed as a means to quantify the probable types and frequency of failure. This paper details the reliability findings at this point as well as methods for improvement of the typical product. Some of the technical choices and tradeoffs for reliability, maintainability, field performance, costs and quality as well as engineering decisions associated with reliability and field support are identified. Close attention is paid to the identification of a small number of important reliability measures. The reliability, maintainability, support and improvement data should prove highly instructive for any commercial or consumer company wishing to justify starting or continuing the reliability improvement process. Benchmark data is presented to aid others in establishing progress points during development. The data represents a blend of several similar systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1996.500668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1996.500668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计、研制了一种新型医用血液分析仪(实验室仪器),并准备投入生产。在这一系列活动接近尾声时,十个原型系统在开发测试中表现出低于期望的可靠性。设计师不清楚为什么会出现这种情况,因为他们采用了“最佳设计标准”。提出了一种短期的、可控的、全寿命试验,作为量化可能的故障类型和频率的手段。本文详细介绍了在这一点上的可靠性发现以及典型产品的改进方法。在可靠性、可维护性、现场性能、成本和质量以及与可靠性和现场支持相关的工程决策方面,确定了一些技术选择和权衡。对少数重要可靠性指标的识别给予了密切关注。可靠性、可维护性、支持和改进数据应该证明对任何希望证明开始或继续可靠性改进过程的商业或消费者公司具有很高的指导意义。提供基准数据是为了帮助其他人在开发过程中建立进度点。这些数据代表了几个类似系统的混合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability development and improvement of a medical instrument
A new medical blood analyzer (laboratory instrument) was designed, developed and readied for production. Near the end of this series of activities, ten prototype systems exhibited lower than desired reliability in a development test. It was unclear to the designers why this had occurred as "the best design criteria" were employed. A short, controlled, full life test was proposed as a means to quantify the probable types and frequency of failure. This paper details the reliability findings at this point as well as methods for improvement of the typical product. Some of the technical choices and tradeoffs for reliability, maintainability, field performance, costs and quality as well as engineering decisions associated with reliability and field support are identified. Close attention is paid to the identification of a small number of important reliability measures. The reliability, maintainability, support and improvement data should prove highly instructive for any commercial or consumer company wishing to justify starting or continuing the reliability improvement process. Benchmark data is presented to aid others in establishing progress points during development. The data represents a blend of several similar systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信