制作数位乐器:一项探索性工作坊研究

Jack Armitage, Andrew Mcpherson
{"title":"制作数位乐器:一项探索性工作坊研究","authors":"Jack Armitage, Andrew Mcpherson","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1302583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In digital musical instrument design, di ff erent tools and methods o ff er a variety of approaches for constraining the exploration of musical gestures and sounds. Toolkits made of modular components usefully constrain exploration towards simple, quick and functional combinations, and meth-ods such as sketching and model-making alternatively allow imagination and narrative to guide exploration. In this work we sought to investigate a context where these approaches to exploration were combined. We designed a craft work-shop for 20 musical instrument designers, where groups were given the same partly-finished instrument to craft for one hour with raw materials, and though the task was open ended, they were prompted to focus on subtle details that might distinguish their instruments. Despite the prompt the groups diverged dramatically in intent and style, and generated gestural language rapidly and flexibly. By the end, each group had developed a distinctive approach to constraint, exploratory style, collaboration and interpretation of the instrument and workshop materials. We reflect on this outcome to discuss advantages and disadvantages to integrating digital musical instrument design tools and methods, and how to further investigate and extend this approach.","PeriodicalId":161317,"journal":{"name":"New Interfaces for Musical Expression","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crafting Digital Musical Instruments: An Exploratory Workshop Study\",\"authors\":\"Jack Armitage, Andrew Mcpherson\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.1302583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In digital musical instrument design, di ff erent tools and methods o ff er a variety of approaches for constraining the exploration of musical gestures and sounds. Toolkits made of modular components usefully constrain exploration towards simple, quick and functional combinations, and meth-ods such as sketching and model-making alternatively allow imagination and narrative to guide exploration. In this work we sought to investigate a context where these approaches to exploration were combined. We designed a craft work-shop for 20 musical instrument designers, where groups were given the same partly-finished instrument to craft for one hour with raw materials, and though the task was open ended, they were prompted to focus on subtle details that might distinguish their instruments. Despite the prompt the groups diverged dramatically in intent and style, and generated gestural language rapidly and flexibly. By the end, each group had developed a distinctive approach to constraint, exploratory style, collaboration and interpretation of the instrument and workshop materials. We reflect on this outcome to discuss advantages and disadvantages to integrating digital musical instrument design tools and methods, and how to further investigate and extend this approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Interfaces for Musical Expression\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Interfaces for Musical Expression\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Interfaces for Musical Expression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在数字乐器设计中,不同的工具和方法提供了各种方法来限制音乐手势和声音的探索。由模块化组件组成的工具包有效地将探索限制在简单,快速和功能组合上,而诸如草图和模型制作之类的方法则允许想象和叙述来指导探索。在这项工作中,我们试图调查这些探索方法相结合的背景。我们为20名乐器设计师设计了一个工艺车间,每个小组都有相同的部分完成的乐器,用原材料制作一个小时,虽然任务是开放式的,但他们被要求专注于可能区分他们乐器的细微细节。尽管有这样的提示,这些群体在意图和风格上有很大的不同,并且迅速而灵活地产生了手势语言。到最后,每个小组都开发了一种独特的方法来约束,探索风格,协作和解释仪器和车间材料。我们对这一结果进行反思,讨论整合数字乐器设计工具和方法的优缺点,以及如何进一步研究和扩展这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crafting Digital Musical Instruments: An Exploratory Workshop Study
In digital musical instrument design, di ff erent tools and methods o ff er a variety of approaches for constraining the exploration of musical gestures and sounds. Toolkits made of modular components usefully constrain exploration towards simple, quick and functional combinations, and meth-ods such as sketching and model-making alternatively allow imagination and narrative to guide exploration. In this work we sought to investigate a context where these approaches to exploration were combined. We designed a craft work-shop for 20 musical instrument designers, where groups were given the same partly-finished instrument to craft for one hour with raw materials, and though the task was open ended, they were prompted to focus on subtle details that might distinguish their instruments. Despite the prompt the groups diverged dramatically in intent and style, and generated gestural language rapidly and flexibly. By the end, each group had developed a distinctive approach to constraint, exploratory style, collaboration and interpretation of the instrument and workshop materials. We reflect on this outcome to discuss advantages and disadvantages to integrating digital musical instrument design tools and methods, and how to further investigate and extend this approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信