基于流量模式的两种基于NS2的Ad hoc网络响应路由协议性能比较

Suresh Kumar, R. Rathy, D. Pandey
{"title":"基于流量模式的两种基于NS2的Ad hoc网络响应路由协议性能比较","authors":"Suresh Kumar, R. Rathy, D. Pandey","doi":"10.1109/ICCSIT.2009.5234702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ad hoc networks are characterized by wireless connectivity, continuous changing topology, distributed operations and ease of deployment. Routing in Ad hoc networks is a challenge due to mobility and thus is a current area of research. We compare two reactive routing protocols by considering multiple performance metrics to bring out their relative merits. Both DSR and AODV share similar on demand behavior, but the protocols internal mechanism leads to significant performance differences. We have analyzed the performance of protocols by varying network load, mobility and type of traffic (CBR, TCP). A detailed simulation has been done using NS2. We consider packet delivery fraction, normalized routing load, average delay, routing overhead, and packet loss as metrics for performance analysis of these protocols.","PeriodicalId":342396,"journal":{"name":"2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traffic pattern based performance comparison of two reactive routing protocols for Ad hoc networks using NS2\",\"authors\":\"Suresh Kumar, R. Rathy, D. Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCSIT.2009.5234702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ad hoc networks are characterized by wireless connectivity, continuous changing topology, distributed operations and ease of deployment. Routing in Ad hoc networks is a challenge due to mobility and thus is a current area of research. We compare two reactive routing protocols by considering multiple performance metrics to bring out their relative merits. Both DSR and AODV share similar on demand behavior, but the protocols internal mechanism leads to significant performance differences. We have analyzed the performance of protocols by varying network load, mobility and type of traffic (CBR, TCP). A detailed simulation has been done using NS2. We consider packet delivery fraction, normalized routing load, average delay, routing overhead, and packet loss as metrics for performance analysis of these protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSIT.2009.5234702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSIT.2009.5234702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

自组织网络的特点是无线连接、连续变化的拓扑、分布式操作和易于部署。由于移动性的原因,Ad hoc网络中的路由是一个挑战,因此是当前的研究领域。我们通过考虑多个性能指标来比较两种响应路由协议,以得出它们的相对优点。DSR和AODV都有类似的随需应变行为,但协议的内部机制导致了显著的性能差异。我们通过不同的网络负载、移动性和流量类型(CBR、TCP)分析了协议的性能。利用NS2进行了详细的仿真。我们将数据包传送率、标准化路由负载、平均延迟、路由开销和数据包丢失作为这些协议的性能分析指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traffic pattern based performance comparison of two reactive routing protocols for Ad hoc networks using NS2
Ad hoc networks are characterized by wireless connectivity, continuous changing topology, distributed operations and ease of deployment. Routing in Ad hoc networks is a challenge due to mobility and thus is a current area of research. We compare two reactive routing protocols by considering multiple performance metrics to bring out their relative merits. Both DSR and AODV share similar on demand behavior, but the protocols internal mechanism leads to significant performance differences. We have analyzed the performance of protocols by varying network load, mobility and type of traffic (CBR, TCP). A detailed simulation has been done using NS2. We consider packet delivery fraction, normalized routing load, average delay, routing overhead, and packet loss as metrics for performance analysis of these protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信