[硅油手术后的视觉效果]。

K Lucke, H Laqua
{"title":"[硅油手术后的视觉效果]。","authors":"K Lucke,&nbsp;H Laqua","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The question as to whether silicone oil is toxic to the retina has not been resolved to this day. We have attempted to find evidence of retinal toxicity by studying the development of visual acuity in eyes operated on with silicone oil. We selected these eyes from a cohort of about 500 that had attached retina, no glaucoma and no keratopathy. The average visual acuity increased continuously over 2 years if all extraretinal factors influencing visual acuity are excluded. Although in eyes from which silicone oil had been removed visual function developed better than in those in which it remained indefinitely, this could not be attributed to a toxic effect of silicone oil, since the difference was apparent even while eyes in both cohorts where still filled with oil. The difference is more probably a result of patient selection. In individual cases in which silicone oil was not removed for up to 8 years the visual acuity remained stable. An analysis of the patients with loss of vision despite attached retinas yielded causes that were essentially specific to the underlying disease. We found no clinical evidence suggestive of a toxic effect of silicone oil.</p>","PeriodicalId":12437,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft","volume":"88 6","pages":"603-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Visual outcome after silicon oil surgery].\",\"authors\":\"K Lucke,&nbsp;H Laqua\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The question as to whether silicone oil is toxic to the retina has not been resolved to this day. We have attempted to find evidence of retinal toxicity by studying the development of visual acuity in eyes operated on with silicone oil. We selected these eyes from a cohort of about 500 that had attached retina, no glaucoma and no keratopathy. The average visual acuity increased continuously over 2 years if all extraretinal factors influencing visual acuity are excluded. Although in eyes from which silicone oil had been removed visual function developed better than in those in which it remained indefinitely, this could not be attributed to a toxic effect of silicone oil, since the difference was apparent even while eyes in both cohorts where still filled with oil. The difference is more probably a result of patient selection. In individual cases in which silicone oil was not removed for up to 8 years the visual acuity remained stable. An analysis of the patients with loss of vision despite attached retinas yielded causes that were essentially specific to the underlying disease. We found no clinical evidence suggestive of a toxic effect of silicone oil.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft\",\"volume\":\"88 6\",\"pages\":\"603-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于硅油是否对视网膜有毒的问题至今仍未得到解决。我们试图通过研究用硅油手术的眼睛的视力发展来寻找视网膜毒性的证据。我们从大约500只眼睛中选择了这些眼睛,这些眼睛有附着的视网膜,没有青光眼和角膜病变。排除视网膜外影响视力的因素后,平均视力在2年内持续增加。尽管除去硅油的眼睛的视觉功能比不除去硅油的眼睛发展得更好,但这不能归因于硅油的毒性作用,因为即使在两组仍然充满硅油的眼睛中,差异也很明显。这种差异更可能是患者选择的结果。在个别情况下,硅油不去除长达8年的视力保持稳定。一项对视力丧失的患者的分析显示,尽管有附着的视网膜,但其原因基本上与潜在疾病有关。我们没有发现任何临床证据表明硅油有毒性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Visual outcome after silicon oil surgery].

The question as to whether silicone oil is toxic to the retina has not been resolved to this day. We have attempted to find evidence of retinal toxicity by studying the development of visual acuity in eyes operated on with silicone oil. We selected these eyes from a cohort of about 500 that had attached retina, no glaucoma and no keratopathy. The average visual acuity increased continuously over 2 years if all extraretinal factors influencing visual acuity are excluded. Although in eyes from which silicone oil had been removed visual function developed better than in those in which it remained indefinitely, this could not be attributed to a toxic effect of silicone oil, since the difference was apparent even while eyes in both cohorts where still filled with oil. The difference is more probably a result of patient selection. In individual cases in which silicone oil was not removed for up to 8 years the visual acuity remained stable. An analysis of the patients with loss of vision despite attached retinas yielded causes that were essentially specific to the underlying disease. We found no clinical evidence suggestive of a toxic effect of silicone oil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信