龙会一起移动吗?中国证券交易所间的协整与因果关系研究——以恒生指数与上海证券交易所为例

Bikramaditya Ghosh
{"title":"龙会一起移动吗?中国证券交易所间的协整与因果关系研究——以恒生指数与上海证券交易所为例","authors":"Bikramaditya Ghosh","doi":"10.5958/2229-4503.2016.00010.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hang Seng (HSI) and Shanghai (SSE) are the two pillars of Chinese dominance for the past 25–30 years among the global bourses. However, both the indices have very little in common, as far as ingredients are concerned. Mutual Stock Connect in 2014 has opened the doors from both the sides for the investors, raising a question on the co-integration once again. On one hand, Hang Seng attracted foreign investors (both retail and Institutional) and on the other hand Shanghai focussed more on domestic funds that are stickier in nature. This study inspects the chances and the intensity of the Causal relationship between these two dragon indices. The time period is for two and a half decades and the tools that are used include Johansen Co-integration Test and Bivariate Granger Causality. The test finds medium to strong relative dependency and reciprocity despite very few stocks being common. It also finds Shanghai (SSE) as the lead or the driver index, and Hang Seng (HSI) as the driven index. Even the model of two indices is different as well (HSI follows Moving Averages and SSE follows ARMA). In efficient markets, this kind of secular movement is quite evident in nature, and thus the study confirms that Chinese capital markets are proven to be tending towards the efficient side.","PeriodicalId":324801,"journal":{"name":"Al-Barkaat Journal of Finance & Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do the Dragons Move Together; Co-integrated and Causality Study Among Chinese Bourses-A Curious Case of Hang Seng and Shanghai Stock Exchange\",\"authors\":\"Bikramaditya Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.5958/2229-4503.2016.00010.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hang Seng (HSI) and Shanghai (SSE) are the two pillars of Chinese dominance for the past 25–30 years among the global bourses. However, both the indices have very little in common, as far as ingredients are concerned. Mutual Stock Connect in 2014 has opened the doors from both the sides for the investors, raising a question on the co-integration once again. On one hand, Hang Seng attracted foreign investors (both retail and Institutional) and on the other hand Shanghai focussed more on domestic funds that are stickier in nature. This study inspects the chances and the intensity of the Causal relationship between these two dragon indices. The time period is for two and a half decades and the tools that are used include Johansen Co-integration Test and Bivariate Granger Causality. The test finds medium to strong relative dependency and reciprocity despite very few stocks being common. It also finds Shanghai (SSE) as the lead or the driver index, and Hang Seng (HSI) as the driven index. Even the model of two indices is different as well (HSI follows Moving Averages and SSE follows ARMA). In efficient markets, this kind of secular movement is quite evident in nature, and thus the study confirms that Chinese capital markets are proven to be tending towards the efficient side.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Barkaat Journal of Finance & Management\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Barkaat Journal of Finance & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5958/2229-4503.2016.00010.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Barkaat Journal of Finance & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/2229-4503.2016.00010.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

过去25-30年间,中国在全球股市中占据主导地位的两大支柱是恒生指数(HSI)和上证指数(SSE)。然而,就成分而言,这两个指数几乎没有共同之处。2014年沪港通为投资者打开了两岸的大门,再次提出了协整的问题。一方面,恒生指数吸引了外国投资者(包括散户和机构投资者),另一方面,上证指数更关注本质上更具粘性的国内基金。本研究考察了这两个龙指数之间的因果关系的机会和强度。时间周期为25年,使用的工具包括约翰森协整检验和双变量格兰杰因果关系。测试发现中等到强烈的相对依赖性和互惠性,尽管很少有股票是常见的。它还发现上海(SSE)是引领指数或驱动指数,恒生(HSI)是驱动指数。甚至两个指数的模型也是不同的(恒生指数遵循移动平均线,上证指数遵循ARMA)。在有效市场中,这种长期运动在本质上是相当明显的,因此研究证实了中国资本市场被证明是倾向于有效的一方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do the Dragons Move Together; Co-integrated and Causality Study Among Chinese Bourses-A Curious Case of Hang Seng and Shanghai Stock Exchange
Hang Seng (HSI) and Shanghai (SSE) are the two pillars of Chinese dominance for the past 25–30 years among the global bourses. However, both the indices have very little in common, as far as ingredients are concerned. Mutual Stock Connect in 2014 has opened the doors from both the sides for the investors, raising a question on the co-integration once again. On one hand, Hang Seng attracted foreign investors (both retail and Institutional) and on the other hand Shanghai focussed more on domestic funds that are stickier in nature. This study inspects the chances and the intensity of the Causal relationship between these two dragon indices. The time period is for two and a half decades and the tools that are used include Johansen Co-integration Test and Bivariate Granger Causality. The test finds medium to strong relative dependency and reciprocity despite very few stocks being common. It also finds Shanghai (SSE) as the lead or the driver index, and Hang Seng (HSI) as the driven index. Even the model of two indices is different as well (HSI follows Moving Averages and SSE follows ARMA). In efficient markets, this kind of secular movement is quite evident in nature, and thus the study confirms that Chinese capital markets are proven to be tending towards the efficient side.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信