公民审议的结构条件:评估“新”政党的概念方案

Marie Haberer, I. Pena-Lopez
{"title":"公民审议的结构条件:评估“新”政党的概念方案","authors":"Marie Haberer, I. Pena-Lopez","doi":"10.1109/CeDEM.2016.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to elaborate a conceptual scheme for assessing deliberative spaces within political parties that propose the direct input of citizens in policy-making as a possible solution for the crisis that representative democracy is facing. Building on existing dimensions, we used a qualitative research design with data from observation, interviews and document analysis to investigate a neighbourhood group of \"Barcelona en Comú\". This recently formed political party experiments with the incorporation of horizontal decision-making practices facilitated through ICTs to establish modes and bodies for citizen deliberation. We discovered relevant themes that allowed us to develop a conceptual scheme when assessing deliberative structural conditions. This scheme can serve as a map and a monitoring device for evaluating the actual practice of parties that claim to engage in citizen deliberation. We conclude by indicating the performance of BComú and by asking if the successful implementation of deliberative spaces can lead to a new party model and new trends in political practice.","PeriodicalId":399705,"journal":{"name":"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural Conditions for Citizen Deliberation: A Conceptual Scheme for the Assessment of \\\"New\\\" Parties\",\"authors\":\"Marie Haberer, I. Pena-Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CeDEM.2016.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to elaborate a conceptual scheme for assessing deliberative spaces within political parties that propose the direct input of citizens in policy-making as a possible solution for the crisis that representative democracy is facing. Building on existing dimensions, we used a qualitative research design with data from observation, interviews and document analysis to investigate a neighbourhood group of \\\"Barcelona en Comú\\\". This recently formed political party experiments with the incorporation of horizontal decision-making practices facilitated through ICTs to establish modes and bodies for citizen deliberation. We discovered relevant themes that allowed us to develop a conceptual scheme when assessing deliberative structural conditions. This scheme can serve as a map and a monitoring device for evaluating the actual practice of parties that claim to engage in citizen deliberation. We conclude by indicating the performance of BComú and by asking if the successful implementation of deliberative spaces can lead to a new party model and new trends in political practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文的目的是详细阐述一个概念性方案,以评估政党内部的审议空间,这些空间建议公民直接参与决策,作为代议制民主面临的危机的可能解决方案。在现有维度的基础上,我们使用了定性研究设计,其中包括来自观察、访谈和文件分析的数据,以调查“Barcelona en Comú”的社区群体。这个最近成立的政党尝试整合横向决策实践,透过资讯及通讯科技建立公民审议的模式和机构。我们发现了相关的主题,使我们能够在评估审议结构条件时开发一个概念性方案。这一方案可以作为评估声称参与公民审议的政党的实际做法的地图和监测工具。最后,我们指出BComú的表现,并询问协商空间的成功实施是否会导致新的政党模式和政治实践的新趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural Conditions for Citizen Deliberation: A Conceptual Scheme for the Assessment of "New" Parties
The purpose of this paper is to elaborate a conceptual scheme for assessing deliberative spaces within political parties that propose the direct input of citizens in policy-making as a possible solution for the crisis that representative democracy is facing. Building on existing dimensions, we used a qualitative research design with data from observation, interviews and document analysis to investigate a neighbourhood group of "Barcelona en Comú". This recently formed political party experiments with the incorporation of horizontal decision-making practices facilitated through ICTs to establish modes and bodies for citizen deliberation. We discovered relevant themes that allowed us to develop a conceptual scheme when assessing deliberative structural conditions. This scheme can serve as a map and a monitoring device for evaluating the actual practice of parties that claim to engage in citizen deliberation. We conclude by indicating the performance of BComú and by asking if the successful implementation of deliberative spaces can lead to a new party model and new trends in political practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信