公共领域和国家领域的比较分析:民事和法律方面

A. Bibarov-Gosudarev
{"title":"公共领域和国家领域的比较分析:民事和法律方面","authors":"A. Bibarov-Gosudarev","doi":"10.20310/2587-9340-2019-3-12-530-539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the concepts of public and national domain. We pay special attention to determining the public domain place in the system of intellectual property. We formulate the main approaches to the results of human intellectual work in order to determine the relevance of works of science, literature, art to the public domain. We study the tools for identifying objects of the national domain in the public domain. It is proved that a proprietary approach to intellectual property right fits into the concept of national domain. We define an exception – the identification of the creator’s right to a specific intellectual result should be slightly limited in time or should not occur at all. We note that the concept of national domain took a lot from the proprietary concept, while it does not apply to individuals, but applies to the whole people. We substantiate the position that the proprietary approach can be applied in the national domain theory only to the extent that it does not limit the title of a nation (people) in relation to certain objects of intellectual right. We identify weaknesses and strengths of intellectual prop-erty norms implementation in other branches of legislation, as well as civil and legal relations. At the same time, we pay special attention to the national domain institution, taking into account its comparative characteristics with the public domain and the results of the intellectual work of the most talented members of society.","PeriodicalId":183203,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues of the State and Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of the public and national domain: civil and legal aspect\",\"authors\":\"A. Bibarov-Gosudarev\",\"doi\":\"10.20310/2587-9340-2019-3-12-530-539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyze the concepts of public and national domain. We pay special attention to determining the public domain place in the system of intellectual property. We formulate the main approaches to the results of human intellectual work in order to determine the relevance of works of science, literature, art to the public domain. We study the tools for identifying objects of the national domain in the public domain. It is proved that a proprietary approach to intellectual property right fits into the concept of national domain. We define an exception – the identification of the creator’s right to a specific intellectual result should be slightly limited in time or should not occur at all. We note that the concept of national domain took a lot from the proprietary concept, while it does not apply to individuals, but applies to the whole people. We substantiate the position that the proprietary approach can be applied in the national domain theory only to the extent that it does not limit the title of a nation (people) in relation to certain objects of intellectual right. We identify weaknesses and strengths of intellectual prop-erty norms implementation in other branches of legislation, as well as civil and legal relations. At the same time, we pay special attention to the national domain institution, taking into account its comparative characteristics with the public domain and the results of the intellectual work of the most talented members of society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues of the State and Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues of the State and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2019-3-12-530-539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues of the State and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2019-3-12-530-539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了公共领域和国家领域的概念。我们特别注意确定知识产权制度中的公共领域地位。为了确定科学、文学、艺术作品与公共领域的相关性,我们制定了人类智力工作结果的主要方法。我们研究了在公共领域中识别国家领域对象的工具。事实证明,知识产权的专有方式符合国家领域的概念。我们定义了一个例外——对创造者对特定智力成果的权利的认定应该在时间上有轻微的限制,或者根本不应该发生。我们注意到,国家领域的概念在很大程度上借鉴了专有概念,但它并不适用于个人,而是适用于全体人民。我们证实了这样的立场,即专有方法只能在国家领域理论中适用,因为它不限制一个国家(人民)对某些知识产权客体的所有权。我们找出在其他立法部门以及民事和法律关系中实施知识产权规范的弱点和长处。与此同时,我们特别关注国家领域机构,考虑到其与公共领域的比较特点以及社会上最有才华的成员的智力工作的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of the public and national domain: civil and legal aspect
We analyze the concepts of public and national domain. We pay special attention to determining the public domain place in the system of intellectual property. We formulate the main approaches to the results of human intellectual work in order to determine the relevance of works of science, literature, art to the public domain. We study the tools for identifying objects of the national domain in the public domain. It is proved that a proprietary approach to intellectual property right fits into the concept of national domain. We define an exception – the identification of the creator’s right to a specific intellectual result should be slightly limited in time or should not occur at all. We note that the concept of national domain took a lot from the proprietary concept, while it does not apply to individuals, but applies to the whole people. We substantiate the position that the proprietary approach can be applied in the national domain theory only to the extent that it does not limit the title of a nation (people) in relation to certain objects of intellectual right. We identify weaknesses and strengths of intellectual prop-erty norms implementation in other branches of legislation, as well as civil and legal relations. At the same time, we pay special attention to the national domain institution, taking into account its comparative characteristics with the public domain and the results of the intellectual work of the most talented members of society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信