有缺陷类的客户端也有缺陷倾向吗?

Radu Marinescu, C. Marinescu
{"title":"有缺陷类的客户端也有缺陷倾向吗?","authors":"Radu Marinescu, C. Marinescu","doi":"10.1109/SCAM.2011.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design flaws are those characteristics of design entities (e.g., methods, classes) which make them harder to maintain. Existing studies show that classes revealing particular design flaws are more change and defect prone than the other classes. Since various collaborations are found among the instances of classes, classes are not isolated within the source code of object-oriented systems. In this paper we investigate if classes using classes revealing design flaws are more defect prone than classes which do not use classes revealing design flaws. We detect four design flaws in three releases of Eclipse and investigate the relation between classes that use/do not use flawed classes and defects. The results show that classes that use flawed classes are defect prone and this does not depend on the number of the used flawed classes. This findings show a new type of correlation between design flaws and defects, bringing evidence related to an increased likelihood of exhibiting defects for classes that use classes revealing design flaws. Based on the provided evidence, practitioners are advised once again about the negative impact design flaws have at a source code level.","PeriodicalId":286433,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 11th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are the Clients of Flawed Classes (Also) Defect Prone?\",\"authors\":\"Radu Marinescu, C. Marinescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SCAM.2011.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design flaws are those characteristics of design entities (e.g., methods, classes) which make them harder to maintain. Existing studies show that classes revealing particular design flaws are more change and defect prone than the other classes. Since various collaborations are found among the instances of classes, classes are not isolated within the source code of object-oriented systems. In this paper we investigate if classes using classes revealing design flaws are more defect prone than classes which do not use classes revealing design flaws. We detect four design flaws in three releases of Eclipse and investigate the relation between classes that use/do not use flawed classes and defects. The results show that classes that use flawed classes are defect prone and this does not depend on the number of the used flawed classes. This findings show a new type of correlation between design flaws and defects, bringing evidence related to an increased likelihood of exhibiting defects for classes that use classes revealing design flaws. Based on the provided evidence, practitioners are advised once again about the negative impact design flaws have at a source code level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 11th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation\",\"volume\":\"191 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 11th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM.2011.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 11th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM.2011.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

设计缺陷是设计实体(例如,方法、类)的那些特征,这些特征使它们难以维护。现有的研究表明,揭示特定设计缺陷的类比其他类更容易发生更改和缺陷。由于在类的实例之间可以发现各种协作,所以类在面向对象系统的源代码中并不是孤立的。在本文中,我们研究了使用类揭示设计缺陷的类是否比不使用类揭示设计缺陷的类更容易出现缺陷。我们检测了三个Eclipse版本中的四个设计缺陷,并研究了使用/不使用有缺陷类和缺陷的类之间的关系。结果表明,使用有缺陷类的类容易出现缺陷,这与使用有缺陷类的数量无关。这个发现显示了设计缺陷和缺陷之间的一种新的相关性,为使用揭示设计缺陷的类的类显示缺陷的可能性增加提供了证据。根据所提供的证据,从业者再次被告知在源代码级别上设计缺陷的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are the Clients of Flawed Classes (Also) Defect Prone?
Design flaws are those characteristics of design entities (e.g., methods, classes) which make them harder to maintain. Existing studies show that classes revealing particular design flaws are more change and defect prone than the other classes. Since various collaborations are found among the instances of classes, classes are not isolated within the source code of object-oriented systems. In this paper we investigate if classes using classes revealing design flaws are more defect prone than classes which do not use classes revealing design flaws. We detect four design flaws in three releases of Eclipse and investigate the relation between classes that use/do not use flawed classes and defects. The results show that classes that use flawed classes are defect prone and this does not depend on the number of the used flawed classes. This findings show a new type of correlation between design flaws and defects, bringing evidence related to an increased likelihood of exhibiting defects for classes that use classes revealing design flaws. Based on the provided evidence, practitioners are advised once again about the negative impact design flaws have at a source code level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信