多元文化社会对正义的要求

Seyed Mohammad Ali Taghavi
{"title":"多元文化社会对正义的要求","authors":"Seyed Mohammad Ali Taghavi","doi":"10.1177/1743453X0500100104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing cultural diversity in western societies has received a variety of responses in contemporary works of political philosophy. While some thinkers see political recognition of cultural diversity as leading towards the disintegration of society or being contrary to liberal principles of equal treatment and state neutrality, there is an increasing acknowledgement of the need for recognition of cultural differences. This article is an attempt to explore some of the philosophical reasons underpinning a concern with political recognition of cultures and cultural differences. The main question is whether cultures and cultural communities give rise to any moral obligation that needs to be dealt with politically, viz., through the workings of the state, and if so, what would be the implications of such obligations in a multicultural society. A critical survey of various points of view indicates that there are two arguments regarding the significance of culture, namely, that culture is a source of moral values for people, and that as a type of community (that is, cultural community) it gives rise to some moral demands. The second argument, however, has not been articulated sufficiently in the existing literature, perhaps because of the prevailing suspicion of collective rights among liberal thinkers. This paper begins with the two arguments about the significance of culture, and then explores the political implications of such significance. In so far as the significance of culture has political implications, it can be said that, in the context of culturally plural societies, the two arguments ground two principles of ‘moral sensitivity’ towards, and ‘equal’ treatment of cultures existing in these societies. However, these two principles, which can be traced as the basis for various multicultural measures suggested by several philosophers, have not been properly articulated in the existing literature. After discussing these principles, I examine the legitimate scope of tolerance and recognition of cultural differences. In this regard, issues such as basic human rights, right to exit, excommunication and freedom of expression are considered. Finally, the role of politics and demo-","PeriodicalId":381236,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Ethics Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requirements of Justice in a Multicultural Society\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Mohammad Ali Taghavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1743453X0500100104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasing cultural diversity in western societies has received a variety of responses in contemporary works of political philosophy. While some thinkers see political recognition of cultural diversity as leading towards the disintegration of society or being contrary to liberal principles of equal treatment and state neutrality, there is an increasing acknowledgement of the need for recognition of cultural differences. This article is an attempt to explore some of the philosophical reasons underpinning a concern with political recognition of cultures and cultural differences. The main question is whether cultures and cultural communities give rise to any moral obligation that needs to be dealt with politically, viz., through the workings of the state, and if so, what would be the implications of such obligations in a multicultural society. A critical survey of various points of view indicates that there are two arguments regarding the significance of culture, namely, that culture is a source of moral values for people, and that as a type of community (that is, cultural community) it gives rise to some moral demands. The second argument, however, has not been articulated sufficiently in the existing literature, perhaps because of the prevailing suspicion of collective rights among liberal thinkers. This paper begins with the two arguments about the significance of culture, and then explores the political implications of such significance. In so far as the significance of culture has political implications, it can be said that, in the context of culturally plural societies, the two arguments ground two principles of ‘moral sensitivity’ towards, and ‘equal’ treatment of cultures existing in these societies. However, these two principles, which can be traced as the basis for various multicultural measures suggested by several philosophers, have not been properly articulated in the existing literature. After discussing these principles, I examine the legitimate scope of tolerance and recognition of cultural differences. In this regard, issues such as basic human rights, right to exit, excommunication and freedom of expression are considered. Finally, the role of politics and demo-\",\"PeriodicalId\":381236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0500100104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Ethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0500100104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

西方社会日益增长的文化多样性在当代政治哲学著作中得到了各种各样的回应。虽然一些思想家认为,对文化多样性的政治承认会导致社会的解体,或与平等对待和国家中立的自由主义原则背道而驰,但人们越来越认识到,有必要承认文化差异。本文试图探讨对文化和文化差异的政治承认的一些哲学原因。主要的问题是,文化和文化社区是否产生了任何需要通过政治手段(即通过国家的运作)来处理的道德义务,如果是这样,这种义务在多元文化社会中的含义是什么。对各种观点的批判性调查表明,关于文化的意义有两种争论,即文化是人们道德价值观的来源,作为一种社区(即文化社区),它产生了一些道德要求。然而,第二个论点在现有文献中并没有得到充分的阐述,这可能是因为自由主义思想家普遍怀疑集体权利。本文从文化意义的两种观点入手,探讨文化意义的政治意蕴。就文化的重要性具有政治含义而言,可以说,在文化多元社会的背景下,这两个论点建立了对这些社会中存在的文化的“道德敏感”和“平等”对待的两个原则。然而,这两个原则,可以追溯到几个哲学家提出的各种多元文化措施的基础,并没有在现有文献中得到适当的阐述。在讨论了这些原则之后,我将探讨容忍和承认文化差异的合法范围。在这方面,审议了基本人权、退出权、开除教籍和言论自由等问题。最后,政治与示范的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Requirements of Justice in a Multicultural Society
Increasing cultural diversity in western societies has received a variety of responses in contemporary works of political philosophy. While some thinkers see political recognition of cultural diversity as leading towards the disintegration of society or being contrary to liberal principles of equal treatment and state neutrality, there is an increasing acknowledgement of the need for recognition of cultural differences. This article is an attempt to explore some of the philosophical reasons underpinning a concern with political recognition of cultures and cultural differences. The main question is whether cultures and cultural communities give rise to any moral obligation that needs to be dealt with politically, viz., through the workings of the state, and if so, what would be the implications of such obligations in a multicultural society. A critical survey of various points of view indicates that there are two arguments regarding the significance of culture, namely, that culture is a source of moral values for people, and that as a type of community (that is, cultural community) it gives rise to some moral demands. The second argument, however, has not been articulated sufficiently in the existing literature, perhaps because of the prevailing suspicion of collective rights among liberal thinkers. This paper begins with the two arguments about the significance of culture, and then explores the political implications of such significance. In so far as the significance of culture has political implications, it can be said that, in the context of culturally plural societies, the two arguments ground two principles of ‘moral sensitivity’ towards, and ‘equal’ treatment of cultures existing in these societies. However, these two principles, which can be traced as the basis for various multicultural measures suggested by several philosophers, have not been properly articulated in the existing literature. After discussing these principles, I examine the legitimate scope of tolerance and recognition of cultural differences. In this regard, issues such as basic human rights, right to exit, excommunication and freedom of expression are considered. Finally, the role of politics and demo-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信