H. Kang, S. Hong, B. Son, H. Yoon, G. Gong, S. Ahn
{"title":"乳腺癌中MDR1、MRP1、拓扑异构酶ⅱα的免疫组化表达与预后因素及组织培养药物反应试验(HDRA)结果的相关性","authors":"H. Kang, S. Hong, B. Son, H. Yoon, G. Gong, S. Ahn","doi":"10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.4.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Drug resistance plays an important role in the failure of chemotherapy in breast cancer. The purpose of the study was to investigate the chemosensitive and chemoresistance indices of breast carcinomas and see if the in vitro chemosensitivity test correlated with the prognostic indices. Methods: The immunohistochemical expressions of MDR1, MRP1 and topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα) were studied and then correlated these with the in vitro chemosensitivities using the histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) and clinicopathological factors in 51 breast carcinomas. Results: In the breast carcinomas examined, the immunohistochemical expressions of MDR1, MRP1 and topo IIα were strongly observed in 26 (51.0%), 16 (32.0%), 15 (31.3%) carcinomas, respectively. The MRP1 was more frequently expressed in poorly differentiated carcinomas (P= 0.006), and those of MDR1 and topo IIα were more frequently observed in tumor overexpressing cerbB2 (P=0.038, P=0.036). The expression of MDR1 was related to that of topo IIα (P=0.015). Comparing these markers with the in vitro chemosensitivities to cyclophosphamide, 5-FU, adriamycin, taxol and taxotere, no correlations were found between the expression of MDR1, MRP1, and topo IIα but from the chemosensitivity using the HDRA, the growth inhibition rate for cyclophosphamide was higher in MRP1 expressing carcinomas (P=0.009). Conclusion: MDR1, MRP1 and topo IIα were all found to be associated with the poor prognostic indices, but assessment of their immunohistochemical expressions did not allow for prediction of the response to chemotherapy by the in vitro chemosensitivity test in breast carcinomas. (Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society 2004;7:228-235)","PeriodicalId":414717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of Immunohistochemical Expression of MDR1, MRP1, Topoisomerase IIalpha with Prognostic Factors and Histoculture Drug Response Assay (HDRA) Result in Breast Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"H. Kang, S. Hong, B. Son, H. Yoon, G. Gong, S. Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.4.228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Drug resistance plays an important role in the failure of chemotherapy in breast cancer. The purpose of the study was to investigate the chemosensitive and chemoresistance indices of breast carcinomas and see if the in vitro chemosensitivity test correlated with the prognostic indices. Methods: The immunohistochemical expressions of MDR1, MRP1 and topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα) were studied and then correlated these with the in vitro chemosensitivities using the histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) and clinicopathological factors in 51 breast carcinomas. Results: In the breast carcinomas examined, the immunohistochemical expressions of MDR1, MRP1 and topo IIα were strongly observed in 26 (51.0%), 16 (32.0%), 15 (31.3%) carcinomas, respectively. The MRP1 was more frequently expressed in poorly differentiated carcinomas (P= 0.006), and those of MDR1 and topo IIα were more frequently observed in tumor overexpressing cerbB2 (P=0.038, P=0.036). The expression of MDR1 was related to that of topo IIα (P=0.015). Comparing these markers with the in vitro chemosensitivities to cyclophosphamide, 5-FU, adriamycin, taxol and taxotere, no correlations were found between the expression of MDR1, MRP1, and topo IIα but from the chemosensitivity using the HDRA, the growth inhibition rate for cyclophosphamide was higher in MRP1 expressing carcinomas (P=0.009). Conclusion: MDR1, MRP1 and topo IIα were all found to be associated with the poor prognostic indices, but assessment of their immunohistochemical expressions did not allow for prediction of the response to chemotherapy by the in vitro chemosensitivity test in breast carcinomas. (Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society 2004;7:228-235)\",\"PeriodicalId\":414717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.4.228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.4.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:耐药在乳腺癌化疗失败中起重要作用。本研究旨在探讨乳腺癌的化疗敏感和耐药指标,以及体外化疗敏感试验是否与预后指标相关。方法:采用组织培养药物反应试验(HDRA)和临床病理因素,研究51例乳腺癌组织中MDR1、MRP1和拓扑异构酶ⅱα (topoⅱα)的免疫组化表达,并将其与体外化疗敏感性进行相关性分析。结果:在乳腺癌中,MDR1、MRP1和topo i α的免疫组化表达分别在26例(51.0%)、16例(32.0%)、15例(31.3%)中表达。MRP1在低分化癌中表达较多(P= 0.006), MDR1和topo i α在cerbB2过表达的肿瘤中表达较多(P=0.038, P=0.036)。MDR1的表达与topo i α的表达有相关性(P=0.015)。将这些标志物与体外对环磷酰胺、5-FU、阿霉素、紫杉醇和taxoere的化学敏感性进行比较,发现MDR1、MRP1和topo i α的表达之间没有相关性,但从HDRA的化学敏感性来看,表达MRP1的肿瘤对环磷酰胺的生长抑制率更高(P=0.009)。结论:MDR1、MRP1和topo i α均与乳腺癌预后不良指标相关,但其免疫组化表达的评估并不能通过体外化疗敏感性试验预测乳腺癌患者对化疗的反应。(韩国乳腺癌协会杂志2004;7:228-235)
Correlation of Immunohistochemical Expression of MDR1, MRP1, Topoisomerase IIalpha with Prognostic Factors and Histoculture Drug Response Assay (HDRA) Result in Breast Carcinoma
Purpose: Drug resistance plays an important role in the failure of chemotherapy in breast cancer. The purpose of the study was to investigate the chemosensitive and chemoresistance indices of breast carcinomas and see if the in vitro chemosensitivity test correlated with the prognostic indices. Methods: The immunohistochemical expressions of MDR1, MRP1 and topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα) were studied and then correlated these with the in vitro chemosensitivities using the histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) and clinicopathological factors in 51 breast carcinomas. Results: In the breast carcinomas examined, the immunohistochemical expressions of MDR1, MRP1 and topo IIα were strongly observed in 26 (51.0%), 16 (32.0%), 15 (31.3%) carcinomas, respectively. The MRP1 was more frequently expressed in poorly differentiated carcinomas (P= 0.006), and those of MDR1 and topo IIα were more frequently observed in tumor overexpressing cerbB2 (P=0.038, P=0.036). The expression of MDR1 was related to that of topo IIα (P=0.015). Comparing these markers with the in vitro chemosensitivities to cyclophosphamide, 5-FU, adriamycin, taxol and taxotere, no correlations were found between the expression of MDR1, MRP1, and topo IIα but from the chemosensitivity using the HDRA, the growth inhibition rate for cyclophosphamide was higher in MRP1 expressing carcinomas (P=0.009). Conclusion: MDR1, MRP1 and topo IIα were all found to be associated with the poor prognostic indices, but assessment of their immunohistochemical expressions did not allow for prediction of the response to chemotherapy by the in vitro chemosensitivity test in breast carcinomas. (Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society 2004;7:228-235)