板上网络:文献综述

Mathilde Ravanel
{"title":"板上网络:文献综述","authors":"Mathilde Ravanel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2690762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Board composition and role have been under close scrutiny both in the academic and \"civil\" worlds. Independence has been advocated as a way to reinforce the board’s power over the managers. However, the empirical literature does not find convincing results to support this view. This paper offers a rapid review of these results and offers a survey of two other strings of the literature that could be used to solve this contradiction. On the one hand, it presents findings on how social connections can affect corporate governance and on the other hand, it outlines the main results of information aggregation and conformity effects in committees. Those have a part to play in boards and how they work.","PeriodicalId":256682,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Board Decision-Making (Topic)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Networks on Boards: A Survey of the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Mathilde Ravanel\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2690762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Board composition and role have been under close scrutiny both in the academic and \\\"civil\\\" worlds. Independence has been advocated as a way to reinforce the board’s power over the managers. However, the empirical literature does not find convincing results to support this view. This paper offers a rapid review of these results and offers a survey of two other strings of the literature that could be used to solve this contradiction. On the one hand, it presents findings on how social connections can affect corporate governance and on the other hand, it outlines the main results of information aggregation and conformity effects in committees. Those have a part to play in boards and how they work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Board Decision-Making (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Board Decision-Making (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2690762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Board Decision-Making (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2690762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

董事会的组成和角色一直受到学术界和“民间”界的密切关注。独立一直被认为是加强董事会对经理权力的一种方式。然而,实证文献并没有找到令人信服的结果来支持这一观点。本文提供了这些结果的快速回顾,并提供了其他两个字符串的文献,可以用来解决这一矛盾的调查。一方面,它展示了社会关系如何影响公司治理的研究结果,另一方面,它概述了委员会中信息聚集和整合效应的主要结果。这些在董事会和他们的工作中都有作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Networks on Boards: A Survey of the Literature
Board composition and role have been under close scrutiny both in the academic and "civil" worlds. Independence has been advocated as a way to reinforce the board’s power over the managers. However, the empirical literature does not find convincing results to support this view. This paper offers a rapid review of these results and offers a survey of two other strings of the literature that could be used to solve this contradiction. On the one hand, it presents findings on how social connections can affect corporate governance and on the other hand, it outlines the main results of information aggregation and conformity effects in committees. Those have a part to play in boards and how they work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信